|
 |

09-06-2009, 05:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
32-20 Ammo for Colt Revolver
I have posted this inquiry on some other forums and received no information........
I have a Colt Police Positive Special revolver (396557) in 32-20. I can find no ammo, even vintage, which does not mention "Rifle" in the description. This gun is in fine shape but I don't want to damage it by using the wrong ammo.
Is there such a thing as 32-20 Revolver ammunition ?
|

09-06-2009, 05:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 577
Likes: 16
Liked 54 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
from Wikipedia:
Although it is an inexpensive cartridge to reload,[1] care must be taken by the reloader because of the extremely thin walls of the cartridge case. Energy and pressure levels for handloading are determined based on the strength of the firearm action to be used. Because most firearms chambered for this cartridge are older (e.g. early model Winchester model 73 and 92 rifles as well as older Colt and Smith & Wesson revolvers) factory ammunition usually has reduced pressures from what can be achieved through handloading. Most factory ammunition exhibits ballistics of about 1,200 ft/s (370 m/s) and 325 ft·lbf (441 J) of energy at the muzzle with a 100-grain (6.5 g) bullet from an eighteen- to twenty-inch rifle barrel. The performance characteristics of the cartridge listed in the sidebar should be considered maximum performance parameters obtainable, and even then only with a modern weapon designed for higher pressure loads. Factory-type loads - and reloads mimicking factory type loads - are the safe maximum loads for use in older weapons chambered for this cartridge, as most of the weapons the cartridge is chambered for are. Few if any concerns still manufacture hunting weapons in this caliber.
This matches my understanding that High power loads are no longer sold by manufacturers and factory loads are safe for pistols that were made for smokeless powder. Black powder age guns did not have heat treated cylinders and should not be used with factory ammo.
__________________
Revolver luvin' Mountaineer
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-06-2009, 06:05 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 788
Liked 1,152 Times in 316 Posts
|
|
Remington flavor
dkees:
I went out to my stash and found a box of Remington I bought several years ago for a .32-20 M&P that I have.
It is Remington brand, 100 gr. soft point, part number R32202. On both end flaps are the following statement:
FOR USE IN ALL REVOLVERS AND RIFLES
Good luck in your quest. I think the stuff is still out there to be had.
Ed
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-06-2009, 06:19 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Acadiana
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 1,324
Liked 735 Times in 269 Posts
|
|
I think that Midway has some cowboy loads but, beware. I think that they are around $30 a box.
Just checked and they are B/O'd.
http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct...tNumber=490856
__________________
" I don't recall, senator."
|

09-06-2009, 06:23 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 9,850
Likes: 2,006
Liked 11,840 Times in 4,461 Posts
|
|
The rifle load which was the cause of the warning about .32-20 ammunition was the 80 gr. "High Velocity" hollow point load which was intended for the 1892 Winchester and 1894 Marlin rifles. The box carried a warning to not use in revolvers and Model 1873 Winchesterrifles. The bullet looks like a round-nose full jacketed one with a small hollow point in the nose, they are very distinctive.
This type ammunition has not been manufactured since before WWII, (possibly as late as the early 1950s, but I don't believe so), and it is highly unlikely you would find any of it.
All current manufacture .32-20 ammunition is suitable for revolver use.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

09-06-2009, 07:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 972
Liked 1,680 Times in 617 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
The rifle load which was the cause of the warning about .32-20 ammunition was the 80 gr. "High Velocity" hollow point load which was intended for the 1892 Winchester and 1894 Marlin rifles. The box carried a warning to not use in revolvers and Model 1873 Winchesterrifles. The bullet looks like a round-nose full jacketed one with a small hollow point in the nose, they are very distinctive.
This type ammunition has not been manufactured since before WWII, (possibly as late as the early 1950s, but I don't believe so), and it is highly unlikely you would find any of it.
All current manufacture .32-20 ammunition is suitable for revolver use.
|
I have one of these rounds as you describe. It is marked "Western 32-20 HV" on the casehead. I've had it since childhood and have NO idea where it came from. I have no idea how really old it is...but before WWII?
__________________
The Last Standing Knight
|

09-06-2009, 07:56 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
there is a box on gunbroker its remington 100 grain and it says for use in all revolvers and rifles its $38 dollars mideway also has it cowboy loads but its sold out its $35 on up
Last edited by manny25; 09-06-2009 at 08:07 PM.
|

09-06-2009, 09:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
The consensus seems to be that currently sold 32-20, even if it says for rifles, is okay for this revolver.
I'll let you know
Thanks to all
This is why the majority of my time is spent on this forum. There are guys here who know what's going on!
|

09-06-2009, 10:18 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 788
Liked 1,152 Times in 316 Posts
|
|
The LSK:
Ray Giles has a pic of a Western box of high velocity ammo for 32-20 on his site Centerfire - 50rd which is probably pre-war. Some of the boxes had a sticker on them which indicated High Velocity.
Ed
|

09-15-2011, 01:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hello I am a new user and looking forward to being involved
|

09-15-2011, 02:10 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 983
Liked 3,449 Times in 1,114 Posts
|
|
I may be wrong but I believe the Colt Police Positive Special was always intended for smokeless powder. While I’ve could not find a pressure chart that uses the same units of measure for 32 WCF and 38 Special I suspect that both operate in the same pressure ranges using standard velocity smokeless ctgs.
|

09-25-2011, 09:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Buffalo WY
Posts: 423
Likes: 307
Liked 91 Times in 53 Posts
|
|
I like the O.P. got a great deal on a beautiful Colt 1917 Army Special 5" 32-20.Never found any loaded ammo suitable to shoot.It is an fairly easy cartridge to reload for and very inexspensive.Lots of cast bullets available and with a dab of Bullseye they shoot very good.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-26-2011, 07:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 7,407
Likes: 2,830
Liked 6,268 Times in 2,175 Posts
|
|
Just for reference on prices. A week ago at the OGCA show, I bought 2 boxes of Remington .32-20s for $40 total. One box wasn't full, but missing a couple of rounds (brass there but fired.) This weekend at the show in Lexington, Ky there were 2 boxes (unsold while I was there), priced at $49 a box. If you have and shoot one of the guns, I'd suggest you pick your purchases carefully. There's money to be saved or wasted.
With the ammo shortages we've experienced over the last 3 years, there are factors to be considered. The 32s aren't very well represented. Those who own them don't do a lot of shooting. As a result, the more popular calibers have the advantage of volume sales. We'll never manage to get the per round price even near the same neighborhood. You can often find .38s and 9mms for $10 a box of 50. We'll probably never see that price for .32-20s again. I'd suggest if you see them for the $20 a box I paid, you buy them too. Doesn't matter if you really need them or not, chances are the prices will be going up again in the not to distant future. Get your stockpile while the getting is good.
At the OGCA show I also bought a box of .32 S&W (not longs, shorts) but it doesn't matter. You can reportedly shoot them in .32-20s, too. I haven't done it yet, but I'm planning on testing them. The case is a bit small, but the rim still catches in the right place on the cylinder and extractor. If the case bulges, I'll toss them out.
If you reload, or even just understand the principles, you can reload for a .32 or .32-20 easily. Its not rocket science. You need to decap (remove the spent primer). And you need some powder. In my ill spent youth, my father made a powder measure out of a 22 short case with a copper wire handle soldered on. Then he filed it down to about half the original length, so it would measure about 1 grain of Bullseye. We'd just seat a new primer, toss in the scoop of powder, and seat the "bullet". For indoor use, we'd just shoot a single OO buckshot. Its the right diameter for a .32. At long range, they'll knuckleball. At short ranges, they didn't have time and would just hit the target. A good plinking round.
But remember, I've still got small pistol primers I paid under $10 a thousand for...  And I was outraged when I had to pay $16 a thousand back in the early 1990s. Saturday I saw the cheapo Tula and Wolfe brand selling for $29 and the seller not even feeling guilty!
__________________
Dick Burg
|

09-26-2011, 08:20 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 10,452
Liked 6,123 Times in 1,251 Posts
|
|
I've tried .32 S&W Longs in the .32-20 Hand Ejector. Cases swell and split. Pressures are low so that nothing comes unhinged but it isn't a satisfactory arrangement.
|

03-02-2012, 08:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
i have 32-20 ammo for revolver
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkees
I have posted this inquiry on some other forums and received no information........
I have a Colt Police Positive Special revolver (396557) in 32-20. I can find no ammo, even vintage, which does not mention "Rifle" in the description. This gun is in fine shape but I don't want to damage it by using the wrong ammo.
Is there such a thing as 32-20 Revolver ammunition ?
|
hello my name is ivan quiroz i live in oklaoma and i purchased 32-20 ammo for a revolver that i had 3 years ago but i dont have it anymore it got stolen .....ammo for revolver is very very very hard to find i have a box of western x centerfire 32-20 winchester 100 grain in original box 50 rounds i might consider selling ive seen that just the emty boxes go fo quite a bit on ebay or you might want to sell your gun!!
|

06-29-2012, 12:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 18
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
I have a 1916-vintage Police Positive Special in .32-20, too, and last month for the first time saw a load that I'm afraid of: a 100 gr. JHP from Load-X. When it first appeared at the site below, it was listed @ 1600 fps. That sounds like .327 Mag. territory, so I have to guess that the pressures are considerably higher than the standard 100 gr @ 1200 fps from Remington and Winchester.
I emailed the manufacturer, and got the following response:
"The .32-20 HS ammo is designed primarily for modern production guns. I'm
not sure of the Colt Police Positive. Back then, heat treat and metalurgy
wasn't what it is today.
That much being said, it is not a max loading for the .32-20.
Have a gunsmith check it out and bless it."
How many "modern production guns" are made in .32-20???
If I was convinced it was safe, I would like to shoot small numbers of these (one or two boxes), but I'm not going to do it unless I hear that others have shot them in that gun with no problems.
After the first couple of weeks, the MV figure disappeared from the Ventura site, but now it's back. Why would they play peek-a-boo with the velocity info?
32-20 Winchester 100 Grain JHP High Speed LOAD-X
Last edited by Buck13; 06-29-2012 at 01:00 PM.
|

10-19-2012, 01:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 18
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Yikes. Having learned a bit more about .32-20, it's clear I was crazy even to toy with the idea of putting those high speed JHPs in a gun designed for lead bullets and less than half the muzzle energy! A good way to lose a couple of fingers.
|

10-19-2012, 02:10 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,330
Likes: 13,052
Liked 14,388 Times in 3,572 Posts
|
|
The 80 grain winchester hollow points were marked OPE on the box for open point expanding
I just picked some up recently
|

10-29-2012, 07:23 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 35,560
Likes: 331
Liked 32,140 Times in 15,294 Posts
|
|
Most comments are correct. You are not likely to run into any high velocity .32-20 factory loads today. Someone said they were phased out in the 1960s, but other sources give 1950s, possibly both dates are true depending upon manufacturer. For sure, if factory ammunition has lead bullets, it is suitable for use in any revolver chambered in .32-20. Best approach is to reload, far, far less expensive if you plan to shoot much. I will shoot several hundred rounds of .32-20 every month, all reloaded. I use 100 grain .313 cast lead bullets from Missouri Bullet Company over 3.5 grains of Bullseye propellant, very accurate, never had a problem with that load.
|

11-02-2012, 04:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Though the Police Positive Special is one of the smallest guns made in 32-20, I would think one in vg-exc. shape, should be able to be shot with the 118gr. and 80gr. Load-X moly coated load, as well as the 115gr. Ultramax, and Black Hills loads, in addition to the similar Winchester/Remington 100gr. loads. These are pretty low velocity all lead loads. So far, I've only used the 118gr. Load-X in a Marlin rifle, and it shoots great.
I don't understand the velocity on the Ventura Munitions site for the JHP load, but in the past, the pictured jhp ammo, was made by HSM, and was loaded at a lot lower velocity (in the 850fps range), though it is always sold out it seems, and I haven't been able to get any. HSM, does have some 115gr lfn available often, and it is about the cheapest 32-20 "factory loaded" you can get, but it is also often sold out. I haven't tried any, but recently ordered some, so we'll see.
I have been hesitant to pick up a Colt PPS in this caliber, because of it's size, preferring the Army Special/Official Police, and the S&W M&P 4th Change revolvers in this cartridge, as they are a little larger and probably stronger guns. When you do fire this cartridge out of a revolver, you do realize that it's a bit more powerful, than you would expect for a 32 caliber, with recoil on par with the 148gr. 38spl. wadcutters, at least for me anyway. I can imagine this loaded with a copper jacketed projectile in a modern rifle, like the Marlin 1894 and the Browning 53 at high velocity to be quite potent for raccoon sized animals.
I don't think there has ever been a 32-20 revolver specific load, BTW, and I don't know why the 32-20 ever got into the double action revolver in the first place.
Last edited by shooter7; 11-02-2012 at 08:05 PM.
|

11-03-2012, 04:23 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 35,560
Likes: 331
Liked 32,140 Times in 15,294 Posts
|
|
The old high velocity .32-20 loads with jacketed bullets were on a par ballistically with the .30 Carbine military load when fired from a rifle. The original intent was that they were to be used only in the Winchester Model 92 and other rifles designed for smokeless powder, and not for the Winchester 1873. Belive it or not, I ran across a Winchester 92 that was originally a .32-20, but had been modified to shoot .30 Carbine. Side by side, there is little difference in appearance between the two cartridges, except that the .32-20 is rimmed.
|

03-24-2017, 08:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
32.20 ammo
Quote:
Originally Posted by weatherby
The 80 grain winchester hollow points were marked OPE on the box for open point expanding
I just picked some up recently

|
I have 2 boxes of 32.20 Western and one box of ultramax, the westerns are 80 gr and 100gr and the ultra is 115 gr.....looking around I found some as low as 31.00 a box..most are up at the 35.00 box range
|

03-24-2017, 10:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 834
Likes: 1,638
Liked 1,068 Times in 327 Posts
|
|
Years back, I believe the state of Tennessee had a tax on handgun ammunition, but not on rifle. (A surtax, not sales tax.) Some ammunition, and .32/20 was one, had a sticker indication for rifle use, so was exempt from the tax. Once you got the ammo home, who was to say what you shot it in.
|

04-03-2017, 01:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 35,560
Likes: 331
Liked 32,140 Times in 15,294 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigolddave
Years back, I believe the state of Tennessee had a tax on handgun ammunition, but not on rifle. (A surtax, not sales tax.) Some ammunition, and .32/20 was one, had a sticker indication for rifle use, so was exempt from the tax. Once you got the ammo home, who was to say what you shot it in.
|
That's been discussed here several times previously. Apparently there were several states which levied special taxes on handgun ammunition back in the day. And the gun grabbers are still trying that tactic.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-03-2017, 02:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fort Knox, Kentucky
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 6,194
Liked 3,941 Times in 1,086 Posts
|
|
The .32-20 is a fine cartridge. Reloading is not difficult. It is quite accurate in both rifles and revolvers. Colt chambered several revolvers in .32-20 while S&W did only the one. Colt New Army from 1907, Army Special from 1925 and a Police Positive Special from 1922. The Model of 1902 dates from 1903 while the nickel 1905 dates to 1907. You might say I am a fan.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

04-03-2017, 02:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fort Knox, Kentucky
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 6,194
Liked 3,941 Times in 1,086 Posts
|
|
Rifles in .32-20
You mostly hear the .32-20 linked to Winchester and Marlin lever action rifles but the Marlin 27S and the Remington Model 25 are just slick handling pump rifles that are great fun to shoot. When I was a kid I had a cousin with a bolt action Savage (Model 43 I think) that caused a fair amount of coveting.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-03-2017, 07:11 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 35,560
Likes: 331
Liked 32,140 Times in 15,294 Posts
|
|
Not too common, but the Colt Lightning rifle was also chambered in .32-20, among others. So was the Winchester Model 43. That's one you never see in .32-20. The model 43 was more famous in the .22 Hornet chambering. There was also the Savage Model 23 bolt action, and another Savage single shot rifle which I do not remember the model number of.
I am sure I once saw a Remington Model 14-1/2 pump gun in .32-20, but I cannot find any information that it was ever factory-made in .32-20. Maybe it was another Remington.
Last edited by DWalt; 04-03-2017 at 08:00 PM.
|

04-04-2017, 06:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plantersville, MS
Posts: 233
Likes: 984
Liked 429 Times in 134 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
You are not likely to run into any high velocity .32-20 factory loads today. Someone said they were phased out in the 1960s, but other sources give 1950s, possibly both dates are true depending upon manufacturer.
|
Catalogs from the major ammunition manufacturers bear out the later date for the discontinuance of the old .32-20 high velocity cartridges: Peters (load #3272) last listed in catalogs in 1964; Remington (load #4732) last listed in catalogs in1965; Western (load #32203) listed in catalogs 1967, not in 1969; W-W (no load number listed) listed in catalogs in 1966, not in 1970.
|
 |
Tags
|
bullseye, cabelas, cartridge, colt, ejector, extractor, hand ejector, ogca, police positive special, primer, remington, winchester, wwii  |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|