Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Concealed Carry & Self Defense

Concealed Carry & Self Defense All aspects of Concealed and Open Carry, Home and Self Defense.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2011, 01:42 AM
moonshine44 moonshine44 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 111
Likes: 29
Liked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Default .380 pocket autos...

I've been kicking around the idea of getting a deep cover back up of some sort. Initially I was leaning toward a Bond Arms derringer, then after some consideration and some posting on a couple of forums, I'm instead leaning a different direction...

So tonight I went to my local gun store and did some fondling of the merchandise, specifically a Ruger LCP and a KelTec P3AT. Both are small guns, both would stash well, but I believe that I like the trigger, etc. of the KelTec over the Ruger...

So now I need to save my pennies...
__________________
Gotta love N-frames...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2011, 03:35 AM
pete950's Avatar
pete950 pete950 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 1,656
Liked 424 Times in 196 Posts
Default

The Ruger is stronger, more accurate and also handles a lot better.
From experience.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2011, 06:31 AM
J.P.60 J.P.60 is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Grosse Pointe
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 16 Posts
Default

I have carried a KelTec P3AT for years... perhaps, since they came out. I carry it in my back pocket or front and have never had a problem.

Quote:
The Ruger is stronger, more accurate and also handles a lot better.
From experience.
Considering the purpose of these guns, is the strength of the Ruger or "accuracy" even a consideration? These are not range guns and are generally used at a distance measuring in inches, not yards. Would one, in a defensive situation, even look at the sights?

I keep mine clean and I fire a few rounds every few months. Otherwise, it's intended to be a belly gun. A backup.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2011, 06:47 AM
ogilvyspecial's Avatar
ogilvyspecial ogilvyspecial is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
Default

Between the two it basically boils down to personal preference. We have both and prefer the Kel-Tec over the Ruger, for me the rougher texture on the Kel-Tec's grip allows me to hold on to it's small size better than the smoother Ruger, especially in the summer if my palms are sweaty.

I never did ask my wife why she prefers the Kel-Tec over the Ruger, I just know she mentioned it and when I gave her first dibs on which one she wanted she chose the P3AT No matter, I still have my Kel-Tec P32.......
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2011, 07:01 AM
Skeptic 9c's Avatar
Skeptic 9c Skeptic 9c is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Florida
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 4,986
Liked 5,603 Times in 1,019 Posts
Default

The extension magazine on the Kel-Tec makes it more manageable, but I like my Ruger better than the P3AT. BUT I would like the .380 in a slightly larger gun. The SIG .380 comes to mind, but it's not quite long enough in the grip for what I want.
Geoff
Who notes the Browning 1910 but it never felt right in my hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2011, 11:42 AM
USAF385's Avatar
USAF385 USAF385 is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NEPA Endless Mountains
Posts: 3,917
Likes: 561
Liked 2,190 Times in 754 Posts
Default

I'd also go with the LCP. Feels better made and simply feels better in my hand than the Kel Tec. When I shot the two, the Kel Tec felt as if it was going to vibrate apart in my hand when fired (obviously it's been around long enough I know it wont, but it's a big reason why I prefer the LCP).
__________________
- The Federalist #46 -
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2011, 12:29 PM
pete950's Avatar
pete950 pete950 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 1,656
Liked 424 Times in 196 Posts
Default

J.P 60 is correct about the use of up close and personal but accuracy is important when one has to qualify with what they carry by dept regs.
Can't wait to retire!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2011, 03:40 PM
walnutred walnutred is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 823
Liked 3,111 Times in 1,025 Posts
Default

I chose the Keltec. I'd had a P32 for years and when I started looking at 380's in the same size looked at the Taurus, Ruger and Keltec. I thought the Taurus had the best trigger pull of the three but selected a Keltec. Part of it frankly was price. Around here the Rugers cost $40-$50 more new than the Keltecs, I didn't see $40-$50 improvement in design, quality or reviews.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2011, 08:36 PM
Capt Steve Capt Steve is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 767
Liked 2,879 Times in 417 Posts
Wink Try the Bersa

A dissenting opinion if I may...BEFORE you buy and LCP shoot a Bersa Thunder .380 CCW Model. For about the same or probably less money(under $300), you will get a far better gun. The Bersa gives you SA/DA, more rounds (8), has better sights and shoots like a dream - not nearly as snappy and far more accurate than the LCP. To be fair the LCP is a tad smaller and lighter but unless your hands are on the small side of the equation the LCP just won't fit. As always ...YMMV (o;

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2011, 10:00 PM
jdh's Avatar
jdh jdh is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 117
Liked 1,120 Times in 511 Posts
Default

BG380! This is a Smith and Wesson forum after all.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-17-2011, 12:25 AM
Goffman Goffman is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdh View Post
BG380! This is a Smith and Wesson forum after all.
I was going to say that as well. Why isn't the S&W BG380 in the lineup? Having shot both the Ruger LCP and the S&W BG380 (the latter of which I now own), I can tell you that the Ruger just isn't much of a pistol compared with the S&W, but all three are in the same general ballpark of price.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-17-2011, 01:37 AM
Pokerstar Pokerstar is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Twin Cities - Minnesota
Posts: 46
Likes: 8
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I purchased the BG380 and am very impressed with it. I have about 200 rounds through it and am liking it a lot. The only issue I have found is that one of my holsters (an in the pocket holster) has a reinforced lip and hits the mag release button. This has happened 3 or 4 times, so I have 'retired' this holster from in the pocket use and replaced it.

The only other caveat so far is the lack of availability of extra magazines. I finally found one in a lgs, and have 2 more on the way from S&W.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-17-2011, 07:42 AM
TDR911 TDR911 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Punta Gorda Florida
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default

As a secondary recomedation, try and shoot each pistol that you are interested in with the defense ammo that you prefer. Many of the small 380's that I have and shoot are very particular on ammo with FTF's being the biggest issue.
One day at the range my friend showed me his keltec that he has carried for a long time. Loaded it up with the ammo that he has had been carrying. 1 shot and all FTF's. Range ammo no problem. Since then he has learned to always check any weapon carried with the ammo you are using. I would suggest to shoot at least 50 rounds thru a BUG to make sure it feeds properly. The more run thru the more secure you will feel about your weapon.
Small auto's can be finicky.

Also how about a Diamondback??
__________________
TDR911 Sigma Laser Systems
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-17-2011, 08:08 AM
Ranger98's Avatar
Ranger98 Ranger98 is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 969
Likes: 289
Liked 624 Times in 232 Posts
Default

Both the LCP & BG are great for pocket size carry
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Smith & Wesson BG380 & Ruger LCP.jpg (59.4 KB, 227 views)
__________________
JR

Last edited by Ranger98; 02-19-2011 at 07:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-17-2011, 11:34 AM
moonshine44 moonshine44 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 111
Likes: 29
Liked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goffman View Post
I was going to say that as well. Why isn't the S&W BG380 in the lineup? Having shot both the Ruger LCP and the S&W BG380 (the latter of which I now own), I can tell you that the Ruger just isn't much of a pistol compared with the S&W, but all three are in the same general ballpark of price.
The BG isn't in the initial line-up because they didn't have one in the store. I need to find a store that has all three so I can compare feel between 'em...

Plus I forgot about it...

Too bad we don't have an embarrassed smilie available...
__________________
Gotta love N-frames...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-17-2011, 11:54 AM
Maximumbob54's Avatar
Maximumbob54 Maximumbob54 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,200
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
Default

Since someone said Bersa, I will chime in on this. Unless you plan to pocket carry and absolutely can’t get a little more size and mass then you really want to look at the Bersa. I have a Thunder .380 and while it isn’t US made, it has got to be the best foreign made firearm for the price that I have ever bought. They are pretty much PPK clones with slight modifications. I have yet to read a serious negative review on one and every single owner of one that I have met says they are good, solid, and reliable. Yes, it is twice as big as any LCP or BG but you get a gun that doesn’t suck to practice with at the range and you will be able to shoot much better with that practice. I have the duotone and I love it.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-17-2011, 03:08 PM
moonshine44 moonshine44 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 111
Likes: 29
Liked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximumbob54 View Post
Unless you plan to pocket carry and absolutely can’t get a little more size and mass then you really want to look at the Bersa.
I'm looking for something that will fit in the back pocket of my Wranglers. I've got a big enough hiney that I need something small and flat to fit in my pocket...
__________________
Gotta love N-frames...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-17-2011, 06:18 PM
REM 3200's Avatar
REM 3200 REM 3200 is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 9,101
Liked 3,216 Times in 1,123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moonshine44 View Post
I'm looking for something that will fit in the back pocket of my Wranglers. I've got a big enough hiney that I need something small and flat to fit in my pocket...
SIG 238 fits nicely in my back pocket.
__________________
CSM, U S Army(Ret) 1963-1990
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-18-2011, 12:43 PM
azasadny's Avatar
azasadny azasadny is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wyandotte, MI
Posts: 139
Likes: 9
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

We have the Ruger LCP and have put over 1100 rounds through it without a single problem. My wife carries it in a DeSantis Nemesis holster ($19 at Cabela's)
__________________
S&W 645, 3913, 59, 669
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-18-2011, 02:46 PM
JIMSPD9 JIMSPD9 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: S/W MISSISSIPPI
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default .380 PREFERENCE

MY WIFE HAS AN LCP AND SHE LOVES IT. I PERSONALLY FIND IT A LITTLE HARD TO HOLD ON TO WHEN I FIRE IT, BUT I HAVE LARGE HANDS. THE LCP IS WELL MADE, ALSO EASY TO CLEAN AND MAINTAIN.

THE WIFE CARRIES HER'S IN A $9 DOLLAR CELL PHONE CASE WITH A FOLD OVER FLAP. IT WORKS LIKE A CHARM WITH THE C/T LASER.

I LIKE MY WALTHER PPK IN .380. THE PPK FITS MY HAND VERY WELL.

JIM S.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-18-2011, 10:13 PM
Enframe's Avatar
Enframe Enframe is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The midwest
Posts: 93
Likes: 20
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REM 3200 View Post
SIG 238 fits nicely in my back pocket.
Or, use a DeSantis Superfly and carry it in front. Much more accurate than usual for a pocket gun.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-18-2011, 10:27 PM
gregintenn gregintenn is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, Tennessee
Posts: 6,925
Likes: 6,833
Liked 8,936 Times in 2,910 Posts
Default

I've shot both the LCP and the Kel-Tec. I can easily hit a paper plate 100% of the time at 15 yards with either. Accuracy isn't an issue. Honestly, I wouldn't give a nickel's difference between the two. The triggers are different, and I slightly prefer the LCP trigger, but that's likely because I've shot it more. I'll get flamed for saying this, but I'd prefer either over the S&W 380. You need a freaking tool of some sort to switch the safety off and on!!! Why does a DAO pistol even have a safety?
If you want one to shoot, buy a 1903 Colt, or a 51 Remington.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-18-2011, 10:39 PM
Pasifikawv Pasifikawv is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 521
Likes: 79
Liked 100 Times in 43 Posts
Default

I, too, found myself comparing the Kel-tec and LCP. I passed on both and bought a Bersa... My brother has the LCP and I've taken it for a walk a few times. I am glad I went with the Bersa.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-18-2011, 10:56 PM
mkk41 mkk41 is offline
Banned
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
Default

For almost 25yrs , my faithful companion was an AMT Back-Up on a daily basis. Carried in in a Bianchi IWB behind my belt buckle( back before the beer gut) , and then in my back pocket , usually under a bandanna. In the cold weather , it was in my jacket pocket.



Then I got a Kel-Tec P3AT. It's so light , I hardly even know it's there. I don't leave home without it.

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-18-2011, 11:00 PM
mkk41 mkk41 is offline
Banned
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by pete950 View Post
The Ruger is stronger,
Got any proof to back that up?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-19-2011, 12:45 AM
REM 3200's Avatar
REM 3200 REM 3200 is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 9,101
Liked 3,216 Times in 1,123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enframe View Post
Or, use a DeSantis Superfly and carry it in front. Much more accurate than usual for a pocket gun.
I have a Superfly but like my D. M. Bullard leather wallet style more.
__________________
CSM, U S Army(Ret) 1963-1990
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-19-2011, 01:50 AM
stantheman86 stantheman86 is offline
US Veteran
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,479
Likes: 18
Liked 530 Times in 243 Posts
Default

I wish Ruger would make an LCP in .32 Auto......
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-19-2011, 02:48 AM
pete950's Avatar
pete950 pete950 is offline
Member
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 1,656
Liked 424 Times in 196 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkk41 View Post
Got any proof to back that up?
I said it was my experience I probably should have said its my opinoin
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-19-2011, 03:44 PM
mkk41 mkk41 is offline
Banned
.380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos... .380 pocket autos...  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
Talking

Stronger?

Never heard of a catastrophic slide failure or ruptured chamber/barrel of a P3AT , have you?

The Kel-Tec has been around a lot longer than the Ruger LCP , which is undeniably a copy of the P3AT. Saying the Ruger is better or stronger , just because 'it's a Ruger' is silly. Barrel , chamber and slide dimensions are almost identical. The Ruger has also had a recall or two. Some say the Ruger has more of a grip , but bigger goes against the grain of what makes for most concealable. The K-T is flatter and thinner in the grip , which is good for pocket carry. Accuracy is a moot point with these two. It's not a target pistol , a plinker or even a mid range combat weapon. 7yds is about the max , and most nefarious social encounters happen a lot closer. IMO , it's for sticking in someones ear or under their chin when engaged in a furball.

Had my P3AT for about 7 years now. Like my now semi-retired Back-Up , it's got a few dents and dings from being dropped a few times , but it still runs thru most ammo just fine. If someone offered me a brand new Ruger LCP in trade for it , even up , I'd decline.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
380, bg380, bianchi, browning, bullard, ccw, colt, desantis, leather, ppk, remington, ruger, sig arms, smith and wesson, taurus, walther


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Terminal Ballistics with Pocket Autos CoMF Ammo 10 10-06-2015 12:38 AM
32 and 35 autos Jodykid S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 12 08-13-2014 07:23 PM
9 mm,autos jdf1966 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 8 04-18-2014 10:38 AM
Can I See Your S&W .45 Autos? Wyatt Burp Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 106 03-15-2013 11:06 PM
M&Pc Pocket Concealment System "Harpoon" Pocket Holster mtimperman Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 0 08-31-2010 05:20 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)