Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Concealed Carry & Self Defense

Concealed Carry & Self Defense All aspects of Concealed and Open Carry, Home and Self Defense.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 12-24-2023, 07:24 PM
John Patrick John Patrick is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3,937
Liked 2,464 Times in 884 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT ROCK 11B View Post
Put a deposit down at your LGS for a K6XS. It’s a $1200 snubby.

Revolvers are a niche. I like them because of the nostalgia but my children do not own a revolver or interested in any I have.
Haven’t shot one but have handled every variety of the Kimber. No love for the Kimber revolvers. And they’re ugly.

Last edited by John Patrick; 12-24-2023 at 07:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #52  
Old 12-24-2023, 07:49 PM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is offline
US Veteran
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 11,552
Likes: 6,454
Liked 27,360 Times in 7,997 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Patrick View Post
No love for the Kimber revolvers. And they’re ugly.
No love for any Kimber.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #53  
Old 12-25-2023, 09:29 AM
Data Data is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 181
Likes: 716
Liked 175 Times in 96 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10Mad View Post
S&W has repeatedly shown they would rather piss down their own leg than respond to their customers. They spent time and money to develop the 30 SC to get a gun that has more capacity and less recoil. They build all manner of easy rack autos for older shooters. Please tell me that today re-releasing a 6 shot 32 j frame wouldn’t be a hit. The ammo companies would respond just like they did with the 30 SC if the guns were available. R&D cost is zero since they already made the dang gun before. Instead they let Kimber eat their lunch with a true 6 shot lightweight revolver with decent sights. I can’t find a K6XS to buy because they sell as fast as they hit the counter. Revolvers aren’t dead, Colt has proven that, but selling the same rudimentary J frame for the past 50 years ain’t helping. Retro is way.

Well said.

I spoke with S&W sales rep recently, and asked about the sales of the new 30 SC ... and he stated that sales are very much non-existent (nationally). Sad.

As for the .327 caliber Ruger LCR and LCRx the shops in my area can't keep them in stock, as well as the 9mm chambered models.

Kimber's sales do exceptionally well in my vicinity.

I agree that revolvers aren't dead, but it seems to me and like others have said, that the 9mm semi-auto is king of the hill. It's all about reduced size and capacity. Honestly, I think the Sig P365 is the catalyst for booming sales.

Now every gun manufacturer wants a piece of the pie. It feels to me that Smith wanted it too, but their approach was to develop a smaller diameter cartridge without having to re-engineeer a magazine and such. And the results are ... (the sounds of crickets).

All credit to Sig. They were aggressive in their marketing, and it very much changed the landscape of the small concealed handgun market. Yes, I did own P365, but I didn't care for the ergonomics. I prefer Glock hands down when it comes to the plastic semi-auto.

I wish that Smith will truly catch on and approach the J frame in the .32 caliber with the same level of prowess that Sig did with their p365. Interestingly, I wouldn't be surprised if Sig came out with their own revolver. Perhaps, they will collaborate with Manhurin. Well, that is food for thought and my day dream. Carry on.

Last edited by Data; 12-25-2023 at 09:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 12-25-2023, 12:53 PM
haywood's Avatar
haywood haywood is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 9,889
Liked 2,850 Times in 1,042 Posts
Default

I’m too old to switch. I’ll stick with my 38 Snubs and my 9mm semi autos. What I see is 38+P Gold Dot 135gr. Did the job just fine for the NYPD. 9mm. seams to be working for a lot of Departments. I’m not adding any more guns or calibers. Next summer it’s off to The GunRunner on line auction. Time to slim the herd again.
__________________
Two Handguns every day
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #55  
Old 12-25-2023, 01:22 PM
Brooks Brooks is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 143
Likes: 124
Liked 260 Times in 98 Posts
Default

The blast from a 327 Federal out of a 2 inch snub probably is really something... sort of like shooting a 30 carbine out of a handgun.
Think about your unprotected hearing if you choose to use it.
38 still loud but not as sharp.

158grainer is nothing to frown on.

Who was it that said "Ain't no need for a 32 magnum, we have the 32-20?"
32-20 case length is longer than the 327. Like a 357 necked down to 32. Nobody makes high powered 32-20 ammo or modern c carry revolver because someone will shoot that hot ammo out of a 100 year old gun.

You need to carry what you can hit with!

Some of these new revolvers are so light I don't see how most people can hit anything past 5 yards.. unless you are Dan Matthews on HIGHWAY PATROL, and can hit a moving car tire at 20 yards with a 38 snub.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #56  
Old 12-25-2023, 01:22 PM
Grayfox's Avatar
Grayfox Grayfox is offline
US Veteran
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 8,011
Likes: 3,299
Liked 20,123 Times in 5,100 Posts
Default

Ah the caliber wars! the debate just goes on.. and on.. and on.. and on.
First off, bear in mind that the vast majority of gun owners just ain't as "into it" as the members of this board. Many just own a rifle or shotgun for hunting. If they do have a handgun, its usually for home defense. And those that actually carry a gun do so with minimum knowledge or training. Most of what they know came from social media and the internet.
For many years the keyboard commandos have been screaming that "anything less than 9mm will just get you killed!". And many gun owners believe that and just aren't interested in anything else, much less a puny little .32.
I, OTOH, believe its more about skill, shot placement and understanding the capabilities and limitations of what you carry.
I've told the story many times about my wife's arthritis and how it led her to a 2" Model 30-1 in .32 long. She shot that gun very well and had complete confidence in it.
I, myself, have been known to carry nothing more than a tiny mouse gun in .25acp from time to time.
If you wanna carry a .32, more power to ya. I personally think that the .32acp and the guns made for it are seriously under rated.
It ain't about caliber. Its about knowing your gun and yourself.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #57  
Old 12-25-2023, 03:00 PM
Data Data is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 181
Likes: 716
Liked 175 Times in 96 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grayfox View Post
Ah the caliber wars! the debate just goes on.. and on.. and on.. and on.
First off, bear in mind that the vast majority of gun owners just ain't as "into it" as the members of this board. Many just own a rifle or shotgun for hunting. If they do have a handgun, its usually for home defense. And those that actually carry a gun do so with minimum knowledge or training. Most of what they know came from social media and the internet.
For many years the keyboard commandos have been screaming that "anything less than 9mm will just get you killed!". And many gun owners believe that and just aren't interested in anything else, much less a puny little .32.
I, OTOH, believe its more about skill, shot placement and understanding the capabilities and limitations of what you carry.
I've told the story many times about my wife's arthritis and how it led her to a 2" Model 30-1 in .32 long. She shot that gun very well and had complete confidence in it.
I, myself, have been known to carry nothing more than a tiny mouse gun in .25acp from time to time.
If you wanna carry a .32, more power to ya. I personally think that the .32acp and the guns made for it are seriously under rated.
It ain't about caliber. Its about knowing your gun and yourself.



It ain't about caliber. It's about knowing your gun and yourself.

Well said! Your reply is very much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #58  
Old 12-25-2023, 06:52 PM
SGT ROCK 11B SGT ROCK 11B is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: American Legion Post 1
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 3,333
Liked 2,572 Times in 1,195 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Patrick View Post
Haven’t shot one but have handled every variety of the Kimber. No love for the Kimber revolvers. And they’re ugly.
Kimber revolvers are ugly to us, purists. But that is a modern revolver.

What S&W should have done was the “Goldilocks Principle”. 2 inch K-frame is to big, 2 inch J-frame is too small. Make something in between, that was just right. When cops carried revolvers, I knew a few patrolmen who pocket carry a two inch Model 10 so they could use their primary revolver’s speedloaders.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #59  
Old 12-25-2023, 09:44 PM
John Patrick John Patrick is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3,937
Liked 2,464 Times in 884 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT ROCK 11B View Post
Kimber revolvers are ugly to us, purists. But that is a modern revolver.

What S&W should have done was the “Goldilocks Principle”. 2 inch K-frame is to big, 2 inch J-frame is too small. Make something in between, that was just right. When cops carried revolvers, I knew a few patrolmen who pocket carry a two inch Model 10 so they could use their primary revolver’s speedloaders.
They don’t feel good in my hand either. But they do seem well made. But I think Colts has them beat there. I h as ve and like the 3” King Cobra. 28oz.

How about the return of a 2 1/2” Scandium K frame along the lines of the 315 NG. But with a titanium cylinder to reduce weight.

I have a 386 PD, a seven shot Scandium L frame 357 with a titanium cylinder that weighs 18oz. Carries well, but a bit big. I carry BB + P SWCHP-Gs in it. It carries easier than the 315NG just because of weight. 315NG 24oz.

With a Scandium K frame with a titanium cylinder you could practice with 2 1/2” Model 66, reserve the Scandium revolver for a few rounds at the end of a session.

Last edited by John Patrick; 12-25-2023 at 09:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 12-25-2023, 09:58 PM
dickydalton dickydalton is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 153
Likes: 302
Liked 132 Times in 64 Posts
Default

I have two K6S Kimbers. One 4" and one 2". I put a Crimson Trace grip on the 2" and can shoot it very good with 38+P. The 4 inch reminds me of my Model 19s and out of the box has a better trigger. Regular power 357s are not that bad on recoil. I already have enough guns or I'd jump on a K6XS that's on GB at $619, Buy Now, free shipping and no CC charge.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #61  
Old 12-26-2023, 01:28 AM
Grayfox's Avatar
Grayfox Grayfox is offline
US Veteran
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 8,011
Likes: 3,299
Liked 20,123 Times in 5,100 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT ROCK 11B View Post

What S&W should have done was the “Goldilocks Principle”. 2 inch K-frame is to big, 2 inch J-frame is too small. Make something in between, that was just right.
That would be the Colt "D" frame revolvers. Detective Special, Cobra, Police Positive Special and Diamondback. Bigger than a J-frame, yet smaller than a K-frame. Small enough to conceal well, but still big enough to shoot extremely well. I'm very fond of these.

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #62  
Old 12-26-2023, 02:22 AM
Model 15-4ever Model 15-4ever is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 599
Likes: 1,121
Liked 1,201 Times in 365 Posts
Default

Vive la difference!







If finding ammunition is not an issue, but weight/recoil is an issue, then .32 H&R Magnum has many advantages:

* For a lightweight revolver for slipping into a pocket, or carrying IWB with lightweight clothing (athletic, fleece, etc), an aluminium frame .32 Mag weighs very little;

* Since in those circumstances, you are probably not carrying a bunch of spare ammo, the extra round in the .32 Mag cylinder (as opposed to .38) is helpful;

* In a lightweight carry revolver, the .32 Mag recoils noticeably less than the .38 Spl, which makes hitting the target easier and faster.

Is .38 Special "more powerful"? Depends on how you compare them, but overall yes it is. But I find the difference not worth it in comparison to the recoil in a aluminium frame revolver. Heavy .38 Special +P loads are a much better fit in a steel frame gun in my experience. What about "Lite" loads in a .38 Special? Might was well use the .32 Mag and gain the extra round.

Ammunition at the moment is the problem with .32 Mag - like a lot of other great rounds. Factory JHP ammo is often made from unobtainium, and practice ammo is hideously priced. You just about have to reload for this round at the moment.

9mm has ruined everything with panache.

Last edited by Model 15-4ever; 12-26-2023 at 03:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #63  
Old 12-26-2023, 08:45 AM
John Patrick John Patrick is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3,937
Liked 2,464 Times in 884 Posts
Default

Right now on Ammoseek, the cheapest price for 32 S&W Long and 38spl practice ammo is almost the same. $17.78/box of 50 for 32 and $17.10/box of 50 for 38.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #64  
Old 12-26-2023, 11:53 AM
Data Data is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 181
Likes: 716
Liked 175 Times in 96 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model 15-4ever View Post
Vive la difference!







* If finding ammunition is not an issue, but weight/recoil is an issue, then .32 H&R Magnum has many advantages:

* For a lightweight revolver for slipping into a pocket, or carrying IWB with lightweight clothing (athletic, fleece, etc), an aluminium frame .32 Mag weighs very little;

* Since in those circumstances, you are probably not carrying a bunch of spare ammo, the extra round in the .32 Mag cylinder (as opposed to .38) is helpful;

In a lightweight carry revolver, the .32 Mag recoils noticeably less than the .38 Spl, which makes hitting the target easier and faster.

Is .38 Special "more powerful"? Depends on how you compare them, but overall yes it is. But I find the difference not worth in comparison to the recoil. Heavy .38 Special +P loads are a much better fit in a steel frame gun in my experience. What about "Lite" loads in a .38 Special? Might was well use the .32 Mag and gain the extra round.

Ammunition at the moment is the problem with .32 Mag - like a lot of other great rounds. Factory JHP ammo is often made from unobtainium, and practice ammo is hideously priced. You just about have to reload for this round at the moment.

9mm has ruined everything with panache.
@ Model 15-4ever

Wow! Your post is very much appreciated. Excellent response, and the pics are huge plus! Thank you again. Two thumbs up!!
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 12-26-2023, 11:57 AM
PHS327 PHS327 is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 309
Likes: 386
Liked 377 Times in 177 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Patrick View Post
Haven’t shot one but have handled every variety of the Kimber. No love for the Kimber revolvers. And they’re ugly.
Yeah, but how do they shoot?
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12-26-2023, 12:21 PM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is offline
US Veteran
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 11,552
Likes: 6,454
Liked 27,360 Times in 7,997 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Patrick View Post
Haven’t shot one but have handled every variety of the Kimber. No love for the Kimber revolvers. And they’re ugly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ View Post
No love for any Kimber.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHS327 View Post
Yeah, but how do they shoot?
No better than any other gun.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 12-26-2023, 12:40 PM
John Patrick John Patrick is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3,937
Liked 2,464 Times in 884 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PHS327 View Post
Yeah, but how do they shoot?
Since they don’t fit my hand well, I can only presume not well for me. And aftermarket support is still slim, so finding grips which would help isn’t an option either.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 12-26-2023, 01:45 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 1,476
Liked 20,501 Times in 8,122 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shibadog View Post
I believe it was Wyatt Earp who said “Speed is fine, accuracy is Final…”. Bottom line,no matter the power or quantity of ammo, if you can’t hit accurately ALL the time with it, it’s not doing you much good. Find a weapon/caliber you can shoot, then practice, practice, and practice some more. Marksmanship is a perishable still. If you don’t work to maintain it you WILL lose it. The guy that shoots 50 rds once a year is NOT the same as the guy who shoots 100/week. The latter will be far more effective even if his is a .22 than the .45 shot annually. I like a .32, and I’d buy a J frame in .327 if I could find one. I’d also reload for it and shoot it a lot. The ammo issue alone would make this tough, and prohibitively expensive,if you don’t roll your own.
You can get a Taurus Model 327 on GunBroker for around $285.
Not a S&W, but a very reasonably priced and decenct quality j-frame sized 6 shot all steel 327 Federal magnum. I like mine a lot. BUT, a others have said, handloading your own is the answer to the ammo problem. If you don't reload then this one probably isn't for you.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns & money...

Last edited by BC38; 12-26-2023 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 12-26-2023, 03:24 PM
Model 15-4ever Model 15-4ever is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 599
Likes: 1,121
Liked 1,201 Times in 365 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Patrick View Post
Right now on Ammoseek, the cheapest price for 32 S&W Long and 38spl practice ammo is almost the same. $17.78/box of 50 for 32 and $17.10/box of 50 for 38.
From reputable dealers with low shipping costs, I found the same thing. But you won't find any .32 H&R Mag ammo at those prices.

I've shot quite a bit of the commonly available PPU .32 S&W Long 98 grain LRN. It's an incredibly anemic load, which barely breaks 600 fps out of a 2" barrel. OK for low recoil practice I suppose, but doesn't hit anywhere close to POA.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #70  
Old 12-26-2023, 03:55 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 1,476
Liked 20,501 Times in 8,122 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model 15-4ever View Post
From reputable dealers with low shipping costs, I found the same thing. But you won't find any .32 H&R Mag ammo at those prices.

I've shot quite a bit of the commonly available PPU .32 S&W Long 98 grain LRN. It's an incredibly anemic load, which barely breaks 600 fps out of a 2" barrel. OK for low recoil practice I suppose, but doesn't hit anywhere close to POA.
FWIW, they shoot 32ACP just fine, and it tends to be a bit hotter than 32SWL. Slightly lighter bullets, but right around 1000fps +/- 50fps, and the price is much more reasonable - around 35 cents per round.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns & money...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #71  
Old 12-26-2023, 04:00 PM
Amp's Avatar
Amp Amp is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Southwestern Pennsylvania
Posts: 723
Likes: 161
Liked 651 Times in 291 Posts
Default

I have carried a 640 and later a 340 for many years and they have been great.
A few years back I bought a K6s and have carried it as well. It holds 6 (.357) and hides under my belly very comfortably.
Now that the K6xs is out there I will have one soon.
They are selling local for $600-$620. Trigger is good out of the box. The rubber Hogues would be changed and I already have the holster from the K6s.
__________________
Some assembly required..
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-26-2023, 04:28 PM
John Patrick John Patrick is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3,937
Liked 2,464 Times in 884 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model 15-4ever View Post
From reputable dealers with low shipping costs, I found the same thing. But you won't find any .32 H&R Mag ammo at those prices.

I've shot quite a bit of the commonly available PPU .32 S&W Long 98 grain LRN. It's an incredibly anemic load, which barely breaks 600 fps out of a 2" barrel. OK for low recoil practice I suppose, but doesn't hit anywhere close to POA.
S&B and Remington shoot to the sights of my 3” 30-1. Even Remington 32 S&W shoots close enough.

As far as shooting to the sights and practice, I don’t care, so long as the given ammo reliably groups. If I’ve figured out that X brand shoots 2” high, I can still select the same POA and judge my shooting by factoring in the 2” offset.

I get that 32 H&R or 327 Federal ammo is expensive (as is good, carry quality 357 compared to practice 38spl,) but how much do you really need to shoot?

I don’t shoot much 357 in my 357s, far more cheap 38spl.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-26-2023, 04:30 PM
Sgt. Buzzard Sgt. Buzzard is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NoVA
Posts: 381
Likes: 466
Liked 876 Times in 286 Posts
Default

Instead they let Kimber eat their lunch with a true 6 shot lightweight revolver with decent sights. I can’t find a K6XS to buy because they sell as fast as they hit the counter.[/QUOTE]

MSRP is $679. With reports of LGS asking $1200? I would make sure that store knew where I wouldn't be shopping anymore.

Anyway I spent a boat load of money a couple of years ago on a Kimber K6s 3" DAO. Very disappointed when I found the revolvers cylinder would lock up and not ah, rotate. Sent it right back and had it back in a week. OK that service was good but the consumer is not supposed to be the quality control person. There is a good number of reports complaining of this cylinder jamming problem.

Good luck to the new Kimber buyers, I'm sticking with J frames.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #74  
Old 12-26-2023, 11:18 PM
dickydalton dickydalton is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 153
Likes: 302
Liked 132 Times in 64 Posts
Default

As I said above, I already have two K6S revolvers and even told you all where the new K6XS was only $619 delivered no one bought it so now I'll have one of them too.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 12-27-2023, 12:08 AM
biku324's Avatar
biku324 biku324 is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NM - Land of Enchantment
Posts: 6,332
Likes: 13,630
Liked 14,499 Times in 4,381 Posts
Default

Last year I broke the last good ash handle I had for my 8 lb sledge. At the nearby gianormous building supply big box store I found a choice between already warped, wide-grained handles and a fiberglass-handled 10 lb sledge for a couple of bucks more and took the heavier hammer home.

I simply would not have believed the extra striking, driving, breaking, and splitting power a slightly larger sledge would provide had I not experienced it.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 01-02-2024, 02:22 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 14,776
Likes: 1,476
Liked 20,501 Times in 8,122 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biku324 View Post
Last year I broke the last good ash handle I had for my 8 lb sledge. At the nearby gianormous building supply big box store I found a choice between already warped, wide-grained handles and a fiberglass-handled 10 lb sledge for a couple of bucks more and took the heavier hammer home.

I simply would not have believed the extra striking, driving, breaking, and splitting power a slightly larger sledge would provide had I not experienced it.
Yeah, 2 pounds doesn't sound like much, but in this case it is a 25% increase in weight. That makes a HUGE difference, especially in an application where kinetic impact force is the only metric under consideration.

On the other hand, you aren't going to be able to swing that heavier hammer as many times non-stop either.

So there is a tradeoff.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns & money...

Last edited by BC38; 01-02-2024 at 02:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 01-02-2024, 04:29 PM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is offline
US Veteran
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 11,552
Likes: 6,454
Liked 27,360 Times in 7,997 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT ROCK 11B View Post
Then you remember when Compton PD authorized .44 Magnum for on duty carry? Dirty Harry was based on one of their Detectives. In 1971 no one would watch a movie set in Compton but San Francisco, bingo! (SFPD did authorize the .41 Magnum)

A lot of the smaller Departments, Culver City, Torrance, Long Beach, Pomona and others have a long history of 1911s as duty pistols. Plus others who allow the off duty carry of 1911s. Eventually I carry a Colt Government off duty and eventually it was approved for on duty.
I was at the Marine Barracks at NWS Seal Beach as the Guard Chief. Seal Beach PD carried Colt Series 70's in .45ACP. Then I moved over to NS Long Beach as an advisor to the Security Department and I carried a Colt M1911A1.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 01-02-2024, 05:31 PM
Data Data is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 181
Likes: 716
Liked 175 Times in 96 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Data View Post
What is the consensus here on the S&W Forum ...

Question:

Does the .38 Special offer a greater advantage than the .327 Magnum or .32 H&R Magnum in context of a snub nose revolver with a 2" or less?

My take ...
While there is nothing wrong a with 5 shot .38 Special, it seems to me that perhaps Smith & Wesson could start producing a 6 shot .327 Magnum J-frame because of it's greater versatility and "relative" stopping power compared to .38 Special. Absurd as it seems, why is Smith & Wesson lagging behind the times when it comes to offering this new caliber? It seems to me that Ruger is the leader in revolver caliber offerings as for concealed carry options. Why? or Why not? What's your take on this subject?
Great post Data!
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 01-14-2024, 06:54 PM
mtgianni mtgianni is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 7,461
Likes: 12,036
Liked 6,975 Times in 3,421 Posts
Default

I'm a few months shy of 70 and been shooting since I was 5. I never thought I would see the time when I couldn't go to a shop with reloading supplies that didn't have a barrel of 5.56 brass next to their barrel of 38 special brass. Those times have come. Revolvers are as out of favor as the rimmed cartridges that fit them.
I expect that the percentage of any conflict I might witness would be a four legged creature rather than a two legged by a huge margin. I am comfortable carrying around my cast loads whether they are 7 rounds of 32 Mag or 5 of 38 special. I might have a 40 or a 22 lr in my pocket instead. I will not pack what I cannot get ammunition for.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #80  
Old 01-14-2024, 07:42 PM
Sistema1927's Avatar
Sistema1927 Sistema1927 is offline
US Veteran
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: "Land of Disenchantment"
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 4,210
Liked 9,697 Times in 2,689 Posts
Default

I love shooting revolvers in .32 S&W Long, .32 H&R Magnum, .327 Fed Magnum, .38 Special, .357 Magnum, and .45 ACP.

I carry a Sig P365 9mm.
__________________
Only a cold warrior
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 01-16-2024, 10:32 PM
Data Data is offline
Member
Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s) Concealed Carry: .38 Special vs .32 Magnum(s)  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 181
Likes: 716
Liked 175 Times in 96 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Sistema1927;141907063]I love shooting revolvers in .32 S&W Long, .32 H&R Magnum, .327 Fed Magnum, .38 Special, .357 Magnum, and .45 ACP.

I carry a Sig P365 9mm.


The Sig P365 is a very nice platform. What is your current setup? Are your magazines flush, or do you carry the extended magazines? Red Dot? Standard Sights? Barrel Length?

Last edited by Data; 01-16-2024 at 10:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Texas Finally Pass an Open Carry Law for Concealed Carry Licensees BPNovum 2nd Amendment Forum 294 05-09-2018 08:43 PM
OPEN CARRY IN A CONCEALED CARRY STATE Miles Away Concealed Carry & Self Defense 111 03-09-2016 01:16 PM
open carry/concealed carry dilemma JJD0527 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 56 01-27-2016 05:22 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 AM.


© 2000-2025 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)