|
|
04-23-2012, 09:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 232
Liked 693 Times in 252 Posts
|
|
Remington awarded contract for M4/M4A1
From Military Times:
"U.S. Army places order for 24,000 M4 carbines with Remington
It was bound to happen. The U.S. Army has been buying M4 carbines exclusively from Colt since 2002 (though the first Colt M4 contract was awarded in 1996). But, as of 18:20 4/20/12, Remington Arms has been added to that dance card. The question is whether Colt retained a portion of the contract. It appears they haven’t, but it’s hard to tell from the published documents.
According to the Department of the Army’s Chief of Legislative Liaison, the Army today executed a delivery order on an existing contract to buy 24,000 M4/M4A1s worth $16,163,252.07. The order comes as line 001 on an IDIQ contract for up to 120,000 carbines worth $83,924,089.00, though U.S. Army Contracting Command lists the “Max Potential Contract Value $180,000,000.00.” The rifles will be made at Remington’s factory in Ilion, N.Y., from the Colt technical data package and, by my math, will cost about $673 a copy. That’s a hell of a group buy price.
I haven’t heard from Colt, yet. But I expect them to be fairly quiet until the protest period has ended. I did speak with one industry executive Saturday morning that suggested Colt is already close to it’s production capacity. He mentioned the 2009 M240 and M249 contract awards as major contributing factors.
Any of you that were about to buy milspec parts for your guns, now’s a good time. I’m sure Remington is about to go on an OEM parts buying binge. While they will likely forge their own upper receivers, lowers receivers, bolt, bolt carrier and barrels, they will have to subcontract for small parts such as ejectors, extractors, fire control groups, springs, pins just as Colt does."
|
04-23-2012, 03:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: st pete fla
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 5,648
Liked 2,763 Times in 1,213 Posts
|
|
Colt was rumored to be moving to Florida.
I wonder??
|
04-23-2012, 05:34 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,158 Times in 7,409 Posts
|
|
I'm just glad that a US company got the contract.
I presume that Remington will have to use milspec steels/alloys? I think their rifles use cheaper steel, with less chrome, than many other manufacturers.
Certainly, the bolt feels cheaper to me and I've seen more rust on used M-700's in stores than on Winchesters, Sakos, etc.
|
04-23-2012, 05:35 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
Heard a rumor many years ago that in exchange for exclusive supplier of M4s to the Gov't , Colt had to severely restrict civillian sales of handguns and ARs.
|
04-23-2012, 05:52 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S&W Ohio
Posts: 7,404
Likes: 13,899
Liked 8,019 Times in 2,495 Posts
|
|
Didn't even know Remington made them. Hummm...@ $673 a piece, I'd get one!
__________________
RIP Shipmate
Last edited by rags; 04-23-2012 at 06:56 PM.
|
04-23-2012, 06:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northeast, OH
Posts: 39
Likes: 5
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
I hang out on 1911 Forum, Colt section a bit. Colt has purchased property in FL for another plant, not a move. It is currently not publicly known or decided what they are going to make there. The Colt Custom Shop rep who pops up occasionally to answer questions said the main plant has no more room for expansion and the CEO has not announced what their plans were for the FL plant. They still can't keep up with their 1911 pistol orders after having expanded some 40%.
|
04-23-2012, 08:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 186
Likes: 68
Liked 130 Times in 47 Posts
|
|
I'm sure NBC (Nobama Bootlicking Commie-corp) will have something nice to say about this.
S/F,
RAS
|
04-23-2012, 08:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santo las nubes, Florida
Posts: 9,077
Likes: 9,373
Liked 14,930 Times in 4,765 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbh350
Colt has purchased property in FL for another plant, not a move. .
|
The "Plant" is a couple miles from the house. They are projecting around 70 permanent jobs. Since this is a right-to-work state, anything that is labor intensive would be much cheaper here than Connecticut UAW scale. The rumors around here cause me to disregard all of them. Joe
__________________
Wisdom chases me; I'm faster
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-23-2012, 08:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: st pete fla
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 5,648
Liked 2,763 Times in 1,213 Posts
|
|
Dang! I could use a job, too.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|