|
 |

06-13-2012, 10:51 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,332
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
|
|
What do you think about a 1903A3 as a general purpose rifle?
I ended up with one a while back. It cost me a Carcano cut into a scout rifle and an old Savage - Springfield 12 ga pump that had been cut into a riot gun.
My 1903A3 is a Remington. At some point it was fitted with a 1/44 HS bbl. It was also possibly a ceremonial rifle at some point. The bolt, receiver and metal furniture is all nickel plated. Nicely enough done... the rifle remains fully functional. The handguard has been glued but is solid.
I figured that it was never going to be a sought after rifle so I eliminated the annoying shine with a coat of flat black paint. An eventual Duracoat finish is probably in order but that costs more than a can of paint.
The peep sight seems easy to use. Ammo is not hard to find. Compared to a Mosin Nagant it is even light and handy. What about using it as a general purpose rifle?
|

06-13-2012, 11:06 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 739
Liked 3,282 Times in 1,284 Posts
|
|
Great rifle! Perhaps the best all-around big game cartridge made. Great iron sights. Bull-solid action. Plenty of metal parts around if you decide to go back to plain Parkerized metal. I would have made the trade, too.
|

06-13-2012, 11:09 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Newcastle WY
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 245
Liked 1,058 Times in 319 Posts
|
|
I have a SC 1903A3, in extremly good shape. Good barrel, smooth action and extremely accurate. It would make a great general purpose rifle.
The exception, (for me) the front sight was too thin, I like more of the thickness of the Garand/M14. Anyway I got a .074 thick front sight from a gun on the CMP form. (just the blade). It makes all the difference in the world.
I have and do most of my competition rifle shooting with irons and would have no problem using the 03A3 for everything (except I have lots of rifles and don't want to get rid of any of them).
I use mine for CMP Garand-Springfield-Military shooting so I wont be modifing it.
Get some good stripper clips, the sucker, with practice can be fired as fast as a Garand. Just have to learn to work the bolt, by the time you recover from recoil, you should have the bolt re-cycled.
You'll like it I'm sure, its my ideal of the best battle rifle ever made. I like shooting it better then I do my Garand.
But like others, the rifle isn't complete until you add a bayonet. CMP has them.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-13-2012, 11:23 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sadly, Seattle WA
Posts: 11,203
Likes: 25,376
Liked 11,519 Times in 4,721 Posts
|
|
Sounds to me like you did well on the swap, and ended up with a great rifle. And, if the desire ever hits you, you can take the black paint off and have yourself a BBQ rifle!
__________________
Even older, even crankier....
|

06-13-2012, 12:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington State
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
If you can find one, a Marine Corps front sight protector is great; you can leave it on all the time, it is large enough to shoot with, unlike the Army ones. The front sight is known to tear the lining out of gun cases....Btw, I've heard reproduction sight protectors are out there, haven't seen one myself, but if one is not a collector, and if the quality is ok, I'd go for it.
|

06-13-2012, 01:02 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 1,799
Liked 1,571 Times in 423 Posts
|
|
One of my favorite bolt action military rifles. I have 2 and both are all G.I. original except for one having a Lyman rear sight that was installed back in the 1950's by a relative I inherited it from.
In my experience, they are darn accurate and pretty ruggedly built. I think they serve as a fine "general purpose" rifle under most ordinary circumstances. Best of luck to you with yours, have some fun!
Cheers;
Lefty
|

06-13-2012, 01:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wood Co., Texas
Posts: 394
Likes: 244
Liked 212 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
My first high powered rifle, bought for me as a birthday present as a teenager. Something like $19.99 at K-Mart in '63 or '64....killed many deer and coyotes with that thing...dispatched a few head of sick cattle with it as well...carried it butt forward in a saddle scabbard when checking cows and fences...got stolen in '74...sure miss it
|

06-13-2012, 01:38 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,487
Likes: 10,893
Liked 28,795 Times in 5,346 Posts
|
|
They don't come much better.
__________________
Eccentric old coot
|

06-13-2012, 02:42 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 33
Liked 249 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorFarmer
I ended up with one a while back. It cost me a Carcano cut into a scout rifle and an old Savage - Springfield 12 ga pump that had been cut into a riot gun.
My 1903A3 is a Remington. At some point it was fitted with a 1/44 HS bbl. It was also possibly a ceremonial rifle at some point. The bolt, receiver and metal furniture is all nickel plated. Nicely enough done... the rifle remains fully functional. The handguard has been glued but is solid.
I figured that it was never going to be a sought after rifle so I eliminated the annoying shine with a coat of flat black paint. An eventual Duracoat finish is probably in order but that costs more than a can of paint.
The peep sight seems easy to use. Ammo is not hard to find. Compared to a Mosin Nagant it is even light and handy. What about using it as a general purpose rifle?
|
Sir, the '03-A3 is an excellent rifle and a good choice for a general purpose gun. The gun itself is reliable and strong, and ammo and parts are readily available at reasonable prices. If I could keep only one centerfire rifle, my '03-A3 would be a very strong contender.
As someone else noted, the issue front sight blade is very narrow--tough to see clearly with over-40 eyes. Lyman used to make a hooded match front sight (17A?) that took different style inserts, and that's a good way to go. They turn up with some frequency at gun shows around here.
**edited to add:**
The sight I'm talking about is the Lyman 17A XNB. The XNA has a dovetail for the earlier '03 sight base and won't work on an 'A3. Check out the link (it's a completed auction) to see what the XNB looks like.
Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.
Ron H.
__________________
Wishin' don't make it so.
Last edited by Ron H.; 06-13-2012 at 03:05 PM.
Reason: added info
|

06-13-2012, 02:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 45
Likes: 19
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Great rifle, I have an 03 and 2 03A3. They will shoot 1 inch groups at100 yards with my handloads when I do my part. Not bad for an old Army gun.
|

06-13-2012, 04:16 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,170 Times in 7,411 Posts
|
|
You don't know what was done to the metal other than nickel plating it. The heat treating may have been affected. Have you checked headspace?
A non-altered Springfield would be a sound choice.
Last edited by Texas Star; 06-13-2012 at 04:29 PM.
|

06-13-2012, 04:24 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,332
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
|
|
I have not been able to find a bayonet that I can afford. The CMP ones are 265 unless some of the Garand ones will fit?
There is a Thompson in the museum here that a guy had nickel plated. Why would the nickel plating weaken the receiver and bolt etc?
|

06-13-2012, 04:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, Tennessee
Posts: 6,925
Likes: 6,833
Liked 8,947 Times in 2,913 Posts
|
|
I believe the Garand and 03 Springfield bayonets will interchange.
You'd be hard pressed to name a better general purpose rifle.
|

06-13-2012, 05:48 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 33
Liked 249 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorFarmer
I have not been able to find a bayonet that I can afford. The CMP ones are 265 unless some of the Garand ones will fit?
There is a Thompson in the museum here that a guy had nickel plated. Why would the nickel plating weaken the receiver and bolt etc?
|
Sir, Garand and Springfield bayonets are interchangeable. Sometimes even a Krag bayonet will work.
As I understand it, the chrome or nickel (or whatever it is) doesn't bother the gun, but removing it via chemical processes such as reverse plating can make the base metal brittle. Whether it's enough to make the gun unserviceable I don't know.
Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.
Ron H.
__________________
Wishin' don't make it so.
|

06-13-2012, 05:55 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,170 Times in 7,411 Posts
|
|
If someone nickels or chromes a gun, I don't know what else may have been done, or how expertly. And tolerances may be affected, for all I know.
Some of these nickled rifles may have been graded as Drill Purpose to begin with.
|

06-13-2012, 06:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Peach State! GA!!!
Posts: 5,983
Likes: 14,731
Liked 6,389 Times in 2,377 Posts
|
|
I have been shooting 03-A3 rifles since 1980. They are wonderful. I've used them on all manner of targets, both animate and inanimate with complete success. I currently own Smith Corona and Remington 03-A3's as well as Springfield and Remington 03's. It is very difficult to tell any difference between them on the target range. In the field, the 03-A3 offers much greater utility. My last deer was a nice 8 pt. buck shot at 181 paces with a single round of plain Jane Winchester 150 gr. Power-Point ammo. Shot him just in front of the left hip and raked the round though and out his right shoulder. He dropped like a sack of potatoes. I've been using the 03-A3 and M-1 Garand on deer for a long time. They are extremely effective. JMHO. Sincerely. brucev.
__________________
<><
|

06-13-2012, 09:17 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: In the Western Mountains
Posts: 217
Likes: 45
Liked 283 Times in 74 Posts
|
|
In 1967 I moved to Colorado, then bought a Remington 1903a3. I was poor, a student in Gunnison, and had no scope. The rifle had electrical tape fixin a stock neck crack where I had earlier put a sliver into the web of my right hand. My eyes were overdue for a glasses upgrade.
Nevertheless, I took it hunting in the West Elks. The rest of the group decided to go up to a ridgetop late in the day, but I stayed down on an old 2-track road because my arthritic feet were dying. So I walked in a rolling footstep as quiet as possible.
Suddenly I noticed a spike bull crossing the road about 80 yards away. I recall shooting from a standing position. That slowed him. Then I sat down on the road and fired two more times. He dropped just off the trail.
My eyes were so ****ty I think I was shooting at a blur elk rather than a bull elk.
The other three guys came down off the ridge into West Red Creek maybe 15 minutes later. After all the hooping and jumping we looked him over: 19 inches spike ( just legal back then ), and he had lost one hoof, the root of one antler was flopping, and he had a chest wound.
Pack him out? Heck. We drove my 65 IHC Scout right to the ditch swale, lowered the tailgate, and slid him in the back.
My wife was pregnant. She felt barfy just going into the garage where the elk was hanging, and she tossed every time she cooked me some.
Couple of years later I got a job teaching at U of Nebraska Kearney, got new glasses.
Yup.
I still have that gun. Except that a gunmaker at Kesselrings near Bellingham WA did a beautiful fit and finish on a quality Bishop sporter stock. No drill and tap. And I have a San Antonio Arsenal unissued Scant stock ready once I find a front barrel band.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-13-2012, 09:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,070
Likes: 1,745
Liked 10,060 Times in 3,638 Posts
|
|
"Why would the nickel plating weaken the receiver and bolt etc?"
'Hydrogen Embrittlement' is something that can happen to some steels when electroplated.
I've been warned of the problem before on some chrome and nickle plated firearms, but I do not have the knowledge of the processes & chemistry to understand it or explain it.
Might be something to look in to,, or perhaps someone else here has a clear understanding of it and wether it may be something to be of concern in this case..
|

06-13-2012, 09:57 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 7,835
Liked 36,382 Times in 3,893 Posts
|
|
I've taken south Arkansas whitetails with my USGI 1903. Fine shooting rifle.
__________________
- Change it back -
|

06-13-2012, 09:59 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East St. Louis, Il.
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 3,592
Liked 618 Times in 343 Posts
|
|
A Springfield as a GPR...you betcha!!
While the "survivalists" will insist on a semi-auto, like an AR or AK, these old bolt action beauties will do very well at bringing home the venison, keeping the varmints away, and do it with style and grace!
Plus being '06 means it can reach out and touch something at a distance, and said target WILL know it's been touched! Dale
__________________
"Long live the S&W 3rd. Gen.!"
|

06-13-2012, 10:28 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 18,279
Likes: 101,376
Liked 27,144 Times in 9,219 Posts
|
|
I used to have a 2 groove Remington '03A3 from July '44. It would shoot 3/4" groups from the bench, when I did my part.
I used mine for deer hunting as well.
That's a great choice for a GP rifle!
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|

06-14-2012, 02:21 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Iberia, Louisiana
Posts: 4,587
Likes: 25,427
Liked 3,384 Times in 1,737 Posts
|
|
There is nothing wrong with your springfield. I have one that cast me the grand sum of 89 bucks. Bubba had his way with her. Had a spare new barrel installed, lyman 57 target knobs rear sight and a redfield ramp
installed and rifle blued. I did all the polishing work. Had it now for about 25 years. No mystery metal on a springfield. Frank
|

06-14-2012, 08:27 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 341
Liked 3,946 Times in 1,495 Posts
|
|
I think you did very well. I think almost any rifle is better than an Italian Carcano. I've got one that I've had since I was a kid. It's been sitting in the closet waiting for a "gun buy-back" program to hit. I missed one a few years ago, and I'm still kicking myself on that one. I tried to sell it once at a gun show once and couldn't find any takers. Finally, one vendor said "$100.00". I was floored - "...you mean you'll give me $100 bucks for this rifle"? "No", he said, "you give me $100 bucks and I'll take the dang thing off your hands".
Regards,
Dave
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-14-2012, 08:54 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,332
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
|
|
I will trade you something for that Carcano if you want Dave. I kept two since I sort of like them. One is a true mutant that uses some SKS and Enfield parts. But that is another story. I ought write about my mutants one of these days.
ARMSLIST - For Sale/Trade: 1903A3 Model SpringField is the now expired/completed ad that I answered. The photos show my rifle as it looked prior to painting. Pretty but it was awful shiny.
Apparently CMP sold a lot of nickel and chrome ex drill rifles a few years back. Some - like mine - had nice bores and seemed to offer a rock bottom price on a shooter. Now that I have googled it I am not sure about embrittlement - the receiver is thick steel. But I am not an engineer.
I suppose if it turns out to be a potential danger that I will need a new receiver.
|

06-14-2012, 11:40 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 23,063
Likes: 20,914
Liked 23,929 Times in 8,730 Posts
|
|
The Remington models were all good shooters. If you intend to shoot it in any kind of competition be sure to use a padded shooting jacket as the recoil of 52 to 60 rounds in a short period of time isn't pleasant. They are accurate and rugged rifles, but there could be better ones to serve your needs.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|

06-14-2012, 02:00 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lenawee County, Michigan
Posts: 443
Likes: 962
Liked 156 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
In 1985 I was given a Smith Corona 03A3 that was an NRA Sporter from the 50's. It was still packed in cosmolene and in a wax paper wrapper. My friend said he purchased it for $18.00. It's a 2 groove barrel made in 1943. I had always used 150 grain bullets and was never really impressed with my groups. I was told to try a much heaver bullet. My first group with 220 grain roundnose Remingtons was 5/8" using the peep sights. Two years ago I killed a deer that I thought had been wounded by my son in law. It was running full out broadside at 70 yards and dropped in its tracks. I don't think I could have done that shot with a scoped gun. (I would have never attempted it except I thought it was already hit). Anyway, my Weatherby .270 sits in the case and I use the 03A3 for deer under 100 yards.
The action is as smooth as butter, and the trigger is actually better than the Weatherby!
Stonecove
|

06-14-2012, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 9,401
Likes: 5,017
Liked 7,586 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
|
as a general purpose rifle ... well that pretty much sums up the design goals when it was invented
__________________
it just needs more voltage
|

06-14-2012, 08:04 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 782
Likes: 648
Liked 229 Times in 81 Posts
|
|
Superb rifle, I prefer the A3 over the original because of the sights.
__________________
Always bet on stupidity.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|