|
 |

09-14-2013, 07:00 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,357
Likes: 3,991
Liked 51,951 Times in 6,162 Posts
|
|
The Winchester Model 61 Rifle...
Another future article here. Comments welcome. Hope you enjoy reading.
John
The Winchester Model 61 .22 slide-action repeating rifle has long been regarded as one of the best, if not the best, hammerless pump .22 rifles ever made. Totally reliable, very fast for a manually operated arm, slick and accurate, it was an absolute winner. Although it is no longer made, existing specimens in good shape continue to be in high demand, and prices for used ones have risen rapidly to reflect this popularity. Its story is an interesting one.
Back in the 1920s, Winchester Repeating Arms Company recognized that they were behind the times when it came to designing and producing a good hammerless .22 pump rifle. In 1903, Savage had introduced the first of the breed with its Model 1903. In 1909, Remington brought out their Model 12, and Marlin followed them with the Model 32 in 1914. Mossberg also jumped in the water with its Models K and S in the early ‘20s. So where was Winchester when all of this was going on?
In truth, Winchester was coasting and riding on the laurels of its well-regarded Models 1890 and 1906 – both designs featuring more or less open actions using external hammers. It was becoming evident, however, that the public increasingly preferred a streamlined enclosed-action hammerless design that was better protected from the elements and easier to withdraw from a scabbard and handle in the field. Winchester was a late-comer to this contest for a couple of reasons. First, the company was in financial crisis following the Great War (World War I), and found itself embroiled in management problems. After reorganizing in 1929, the Great Depression struck and further wounded the company’s abilities to produce. Winchester went into receivership and was subsequently purchased in 1931 by the Western Cartridge Company. The Olin family, owners of WCC, infused the organization with new capital and management expertise to lead it back to its former prominence. The second factor hindering the introduction of a hammerless pump .22 involved patents held by John Browning. Although Browning had a long relationship with the Winchester organization, he was having a neat little pump gun made for European consumption at Fabrique Nationale in Belgium, starting in 1922. His patents for the “Trombone Model” were also valid in the U.S., although those particular rifles were not marketed at that time on these shores. Any new Winchester pump gun would have to skirt those patents in many important ways.
Winchester’s Research and Development department, headed by T.C. Johnson, was lucky in having two very talented designers on the staff, Frank Burton and Harry Crockett. Two initial working models were generated in the mid-1920s for a slide-action hammerless rifle. These two prototypes of what was to become the Model 61 were submitted to the company patent attorneys, who judged, unfortunately, that they infringed on Browning’s patents. Their re-design efforts finally satisfied the lawyers, and in 1932, the Model 61 was introduced. The patents on this gun were not granted until 1935, but Winchester was so confident of the new design that production pre-dated that patent approval by three years.
Upon its introduction, Winchester advertising stated the rifle “…presents a fast, finely balanced arm that combines the recognized genius of Winchester gun design with the world famous selection of highest quality of materials and Winchester precision of workmanship.” Attention was also brought to the fact that the arm somewhat resembled the famous Winchester Model 12 shotgun in appearance and method of operation. The Model 61 was to be produced for 32 years; its production was ended only by its elimination as being too expensive to manufacture in 1964.
What Burton and Crockett had wrought was exceptionally clever. The cartridge, when fed from the under barrel magazine, was under complete control all the way into the chamber. There was no room for slop or misalignment in feeding and chambering. This system was so good that many years later in 1972, it was used again in the heralded Model 9422 lever action. The rifle’s action, with some specific tweaks, could accommodate .22 short, long, long rifle, .22 WRF, and .22 Winchester Magnum Rimfire. Rifles were built to utilize all of these cartridges. This “hammerless” gun actually used an internal hammer. By means of a thumb screw on the left of the action, the gun could be taken apart into two major subassemblies, allowing ease of packing in a short space. A transverse push-button safety was located in the upper forward portion of the trigger guard. In 1940, a smoothbore model was introduced that was designed to handle .22 Long Rifle shot cartridges. Some of these miniature shotguns were counter bored at the muzzle by the factory. The receivers on these guns were matted on top with the same tooling used on the Model 12 shotguns. Gallery models were chambered in .22 short caliber only. Barrels in either round or octagonal configuration were available. A very few rifles were offered with telescopic sights.
A number of changes occurred during the production life of the Model 61. Over the years, several different lengths and styles of fore-stocks were produced. In 1939, transition began from machine bluing to dip bluing, using Du-Lite blue. By the post-war years, all bluing on the gun was accomplished in this manner. From 1932 to 1957, the buttplates were checkered blue steel. Later ones were black composition plastic. Triggers were grooved beginning in 1950 at around serial number 144,000. Receivers were authorized to be grooved for tip-off scope mounts in 1954, in line with that practice on other .22s of the era including the Models 77 and 63 autoloaders, and the bolt actions such as the Model 69A and Model 75 sporter. It’s estimated that about 125,000 “grooved tops” were produced. In 1960, the .22 WMR was introduced, and that required some changes to a significant number of internal parts. “WMR” was stamped on the carrier for this cartridge, and the letter “A” was stamped under the serial number on the bottom of the trigger guard assembly. The magazine was longer than that used for the shorter .22 cartridges, and the placement of the magazine tube rings was farther out towards the muzzle. The .22 WMR cartridge enabled use of the rifle on small game out to 150 yards.
The rifle illustrated for this article had its receiver serial numbered in August, 1951, but it was not assembled and shipped until 1952. It’s chambered for .22 LR, and the barrel markings indicate it will handle .22 short, long, or long rifle interchangeably. This it does flawlessly.
Retail price for a Model 61 in 1932 was $24.65. This was a premium price, and an expensive one for a quality rifle in those days. By 1941, the price had jumped to $32.55. In 1946, when post-war production began, the price was $40.45. At the end of production in 1963, the Model 61’s price had been raised to $69.95.
From the beginning of production until WWII brought a temporary halt to manufacture in 1943, Winchester sold 59,871 of these rifles. Production resumed in 1946, and until final production in 1963, something over 280,000 were produced and sold. The actual grand total is unknown, but including parts clean-up guns made in 1963, it’s estimated that the total may have topped 349,000.
The Model 61 is a revered gun among collectors today. It was made painstakingly with skilled labor from quality materials, operated very reliably and smoothly, and handled nicely. As they say, they don’t make ‘em like that anymore. Owners treasure them, and in spite of generally high asking prices, they are still being snapped up when found on the used gun market. They are much-admired classics.
(c) 2013 JLM
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
Last edited by PALADIN85020; 09-15-2013 at 12:47 PM.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|

09-14-2013, 08:07 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Okla.
Posts: 509
Likes: 1,221
Liked 464 Times in 172 Posts
|
|
Mod. 61's
You said it all John. Nobody did it better!
I have 5 of them, 3 .22 Mag.'s & 2 S-L & L.R. I think the the 1954 Mfg. models were the best of the S-L-& LR's. Most (but not all) had both steel checkered butt plates And grooved receivers
Art
|

09-14-2013, 09:13 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,337
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,399 Times in 11,803 Posts
|
|
Good piece on a fine little rifle I always wanted as a kid and a young man. What kind of prices do they command today?
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|

09-14-2013, 10:51 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 13,056
Likes: 2,547
Liked 7,204 Times in 3,064 Posts
|
|
You have done your homework on this one john. My dad bought one in .22 LR with a octogon around 1937. Its mine now and I grew up with it. Dad was about 6 ft 5"s so he put a wood block on the butt. I still have the steel butt plate though. Its my most prized family gun.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-15-2013, 12:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,065
Likes: 1,742
Liked 9,996 Times in 3,631 Posts
|
|
"In 1909, Remington brought out their Model 1909"
Was it the pat date of 1909 on the bbl of the Model (19)12, or were the early ones actually a factory designated 'Model 1909'.
I don't think the very first production had any Model designation at all stamped on them.
I really don't know, just wondering. Never heard them called that before.
Great rifles,,all of them mentioned actually!
FWIW,,The WMRF caliber rifles have receivers that are a much tougher/harder steel than the S/L/LR guns.
My guess it's the same steel, just different heat treat,,but a guess just the same.
The bbls & trigger guard lower cut the same as the regular 22rf guns.
I had a couple of good ones. A pre-war 22 shot. A pre-war octagon 22 Short. Just sold a 222WMRF.
I think I still have a standard post war 22 s/l/lr. I'll have to look.
Last edited by 2152hq; 09-15-2013 at 12:50 AM.
|

09-15-2013, 01:17 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Front range
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 2,357
Liked 981 Times in 576 Posts
|
|
awesome....
__________________
Cheers, Charles
SWCA #2442
|

09-15-2013, 02:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 7,311
Likes: 4,336
Liked 8,486 Times in 3,468 Posts
|
|
Great article, great rifles. I have a really nice one that dates to 1951
by serial number. Others will differ but I like the 61 best without the
grooved receiver. I would love to find one in 22 Short only at a
reasonable price but that probably will never happen.
|

09-15-2013, 02:26 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,357
Likes: 3,991
Liked 51,951 Times in 6,162 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2152hq
"In 1909, Remington brought out their Model 1909"
Was it the pat date of 1909 on the bbl of the Model (19)12, or were the early ones actually a factory designated 'Model 1909'.
I don't think the very first production had any Model designation at all stamped on them.
I really don't know, just wondering. Never heard them called that before.
Great rifles,,all of them mentioned actually!
FWIW,,The WMRF caliber rifles have receivers that are a much tougher/harder steel than the S/L/LR guns.
My guess it's the same steel, just different heat treat,,but a guess just the same.
The bbls & trigger guard lower cut the same as the regular 22rf guns.
I had a couple of good ones. A pre-war 22 shot. A pre-war octagon 22 Short. Just sold a 222WMRF.
I think I still have a standard post war 22 s/l/lr. I'll have to look.
|
Ah HAH! You are right. I double checked my references, and the gun Remington brought out in 1909 was called the Model 12. Good eye. I'll correct the OP. Thanks!
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|

09-17-2013, 12:59 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,357
Likes: 3,991
Liked 51,951 Times in 6,162 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shouldazagged
Good piece on a fine little rifle I always wanted as a kid and a young man. What kind of prices do they command today?
|
An unaltered post-war round-barreled Model 61 in good shape chambered for S, L, or LR can be seen at gun shows occasionally in the $700 to $800 range. Your mileage may differ.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|

09-18-2013, 01:18 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,357
Likes: 3,991
Liked 51,951 Times in 6,162 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by feralmerril
You have done your homework on this one john. My dad bought one in .22 LR with a octogon around 1937. Its mine now and I grew up with it. Dad was about 6 ft 5"s so he put a wood block on the butt. I still have the steel butt plate though. Its my most prized family gun.
|
I really love firearms that have passed down through the family, often with custom touches or signs of extensive use. Aside from their intrinsic worth, they are priceless to those that inherit them. Your model 61 is a treasure, modified as it is to suit your dad. It's a prize on many counts. Thanks for the pic!
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

11-30-2013, 06:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I found this thread while researching who designed my Winchester Model 61 (S/N 65xxx) and thanks to the very informative post by PALADIN85020, I now know!
Mine belonged to my father, it was the first "real" gun I ever shot. As everyone who has owned or shot one will attest, they're an accurate, sweet shooting piece for sure. It has a great trigger for a mass produced .22, and it has a good balanced feel in my opinion. I'm an inveterate tinkerer, but I cannot think of a single thing I would change.
Last edited by cobalt327; 11-30-2013 at 06:09 AM.
|

11-30-2013, 08:09 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 3,376
Liked 5,080 Times in 1,990 Posts
|
|
Of all the Win pump 22's I've owned (1890, 1906, 61, 62A), the 61 is my favorite.
|

11-30-2013, 08:57 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,263
Likes: 9,362
Liked 30,169 Times in 9,773 Posts
|
|
EXCELLENT POST!
I have a similar model the 62 w/ exposed hammer. Not identical but part of the family.
I really never liked or disliked the .22 pumps, but when my Dad passed away almost 3 years ago and I inherited his collection and quickly took a liking to the rifle. Just a fun gun for a day of shooting.
|

11-30-2013, 09:11 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 2,946
Likes: 2,408
Liked 4,732 Times in 1,623 Posts
|
|
Don't own one, but there was one on my grandparent's farm when I was growing up. It was the main 'hog killin' ' rifle when butchering time came, and later a cousin and I used it on many adventures.
Great old rifle - your article makes me want one now. Darn.
__________________
Ret'd LEO
SWCA #2275
|

11-30-2013, 09:41 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,666
Likes: 1,781
Liked 17,779 Times in 4,636 Posts
|
|
Hi:
In the 1950s Winchester always ran an half page ad in "Boys Life" Magazine in the December issue. The ad had three Winchester rifles pictured. 1. Model 61 2. Model 62 3. Model 63. Next to each rifle was a blank box. At top of the ad was printed " Dear Mom and Dad, This is what I want for Christmas".
The Reader was supposed to put a check mark in the blank box next to the rifle he/she wanted and tape the cut out ad to the parents' dresser mirror.
Every Christmas season I did this for a Model 62, however I never received one for Christmas. (poor family).
|

11-30-2013, 10:02 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 3,376
Liked 5,080 Times in 1,990 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyj
Hi:
In the 1950s Winchester always ran an half page ad in "Boys Life" Magazine in the December issue.
|
Boy's Life magazine. Little off topic but I'd forgot about that until you mentioned it. As a cub & boy scout I recall enjoying reading those.
Sorry for the hijack.
|

11-30-2013, 12:34 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 13,056
Likes: 2,547
Liked 7,204 Times in 3,064 Posts
|
|
I have had several model 62A`s in the past. Besides dads octagon barreled .22 LR I showed I have a model 90 highly customized. Someone before me had a fancy checkered pistol grip stock put on it. It was in .22 WRF so it being already reworked I went ahead and had it re chambered to .22 WMRF. I also own this almost end of production model 63 with the grooved receiver. I found it new in the box with hanging tags about 30 years after it was made. 1957/1987. I have loved just about every winchester made. Love the flat sides, sleek, fast handling and good workmanship of all them.
|

11-30-2013, 12:48 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Auburn, Kansas
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 4,962
Liked 4,997 Times in 919 Posts
|
|
Another excellent article Paladin. Winchester .22s are my addiction. When I was a kid I wanted a Winchester .22 pump in the worst way. I finally have that itch scratched. I have a really nice 61 in S,L,LR and a like new in WMRF.
I also have a whole handful of 1906 and 1890 models. I have one 62A and one model 63 that is factory scoped. I can quit anytime, I'm not addicted.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|