Cheapest Gun you consider Good not SW

s2harry

s2harry

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
228
Reaction score
110
Location
Commifornia
I never liked anything but SW and Colt Autos. Once in the 70s I handled a Taurus yeek the action felt like it was full of sand. So I see a 3 inch Model 85SS a while back and thought it was kinda nice they removed the sand. I do not like the trigger spring design maybe some are different. Could tell it was still a compromise but it seemed the minimum gun for quality. Looking at Tarus recently I discover they make CNC machinery! Hmm they cant make a perfect pistol but make Aerospace machines? Well it seems they make a few I could hack The 905 .357 is ok I shot one of those and the 817 and 85 seem ok I dont know about the autos. I dont know if they shoot to POI either but seem ok so far. Of the cheaper revolvers I think thats as low as Id go. What is your bottom line?
 
Register to hide this ad
MHO? You get what you pay for. Not something I heard, saw it with my own eyes. A close friend bought a Taurus 357 snubby for CC, same reason as your post, cost. Less than 100rds, (all 38spl), the cylinder fell off in his hand. In all fairness, Taurus made it right, but it's not a piece I'd ever trust again. Your call, Harry. Me? I'd save up a little longer, get a S&W or Ruger.
 
I've had good luck with Taurus revolvers. I've had about a half dozen or so, never had a problem. They were all older ones, made from the 70's to the mid 90's. I look for the older ones, and wouldn't hesitate to buy another one after checking it out the same as I would a Smith & Wesson or a Colt.

I've never had a bad gun to tell you the truth. The "cheapest" one? A High Point C-9, 9mm. That thing worked like a champ and felt really great in my hand. I think it retailed for $149.00 when I bought it. I sold it several years later for $100.00.

I had a Kel-Tec, P-11 that was the same way. Cost a little more, and kicked pretty good, but it was a good gun.
 
I have had a Taurus TCP .380 for a couple of years and it has been perfectly reliable for over 500 rounds with every kind of ammo including the cheap stuff. It is also very accurate and it has a better feel and trigger pull than the Ruger .380 I used to have. They are an excellent gun for not much money and my local gun shop had a Black Friday special on them for $179 out the door with no sales tax charged.
 
I carry a KelTec P3AT everyday. I paid $199.00 and tax.

It's like my wallet, only it rides on the strong side. Plus I don't leave home without it.
 
I try not to tempt fate. I'd rather trust a used S&W or Ruger revolver (for example) with proven reliability and quality than a new, lesser quality brand with a questionable track record.

Of course, I also believe that with current manufacturing techniques and having to keep up with your competition that even the "lower priced companies" have stepped up their game considerably.

If I were looking for a range gun or a .22 plinker or even a hunting gun then I wouldn't hesitate to buy an "off brand".

But personal defense isn't like buying cheap sneakers and hoping they'll last and don't give you blisters. We outfit, train and prepare ourselves for that one time when you MAY find yourself in a life and death situation. Without trying to sound snobbish, I personally won't compromise mine or my family's safety for a few bucks.

As always, just my $.02!
 
Like Mule88, I like the older charter arms. I had a target bulldog years ago that I traded off and have missed it ever since.
 
Interesting Question

I bought my first handgun in 1977 (Ruger Sec. Six) and bought my most recent gun this past Tuesday (S&W Md 681). In between I've bought a whole lot more. In those 35 years of buying and very little selling, I only bought one new gun that I thought was a "cheap" gun in terms of cost. It was in 1983 and the gun was a Colt Agent, .38, 6 shot, snub with an ugly parkerized finish and walnut grips that looked like they were almost unfinished. Cost was $189.00. However, the gun was not cheap in the mechanica/perfomancel sense. It was a perfectly good, highly functional Colt revolver. Just not pretty. All my other acquisitions have been higher quality Smiths, Colts, Sigs, Walthers etc. Even though money IS AN OBJECT to me, I have never been attracted to low cost guns. I'm sure some of them are just fine, but they're not for me.

By the way, the cheapest (initial cost) gun that I have is probably the Ruger MKI that my dad gave me. I don't know what he paid for it, but it sure works fine.
 
Hands down, Rock Island Armory 1911 .45ACP.

I know this will bring the butthurt from some, but they are out of the box more ready to go than many of the 'top line' 45's.
It runs on 4 different magazines from 4 different makers.
It eats ANY ammo you feed it dependably, and cycles with all ammo without a hiccup.
It's very accurate.
The out the door for a new one is around $400. Even in Peoples' Republik of Kalifornia.

(Edit) For a revolver, the Charter Arms revolvers are very good, for extremely good value prices.
 
Last edited:
I have a Baikal/Imez Makarov .380 acp that was well under $200 when I picked up slightly used. The little "peoples pistol" goes bang every time no matter what budget or expensive ammo you put in the magazine. It is reasonably accurate. What's not to like.

momma with the Makarov

92270946.Ay5dlR5e.Wanda01_28_08.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

chief38
.50 AE DESERT EAGLE EXPERIENCE - NOT A GOOD ONE!
2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
dghal
D
Fishinfool
A Day At The Gun Show - A Couple Good Finds
Replies
11
Views
985
Fishinfool
Fishinfool
JRB416
Did the SDPD consider the model 58 as a service revolver?
Replies
7
Views
586
inspcalahan
inspcalahan
CH4
Not your typical Baer
Replies
16
Views
879
SlamFire
S
bigmtnman
A gun to which you are "sentimentally attached"
5 6 7
Replies
128
Views
5K
BE Mike
BE Mike

Latest posts

Back
Top