|
 |

02-18-2014, 01:36 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,665
Likes: 1,781
Liked 17,778 Times in 4,635 Posts
|
|
Webley Mk VI .38 Special
Reference my post in the "S&W Antique" section "B/T .38spl / .32 S&W Long" Revolvers:
In the era of 1955 / 1956 I traded into a Webley Mk VI .455 Revolver that had been converted to .38 Special. IIRC the bore and chambers had been "Sleeved" ? I shot it quite a lot with factory (Western & Remington) 158 grain LRN ammo. It shot real low, so i filed the front sight down. Like all the other firearms I traded it off. Has anyone heard of any other Webley Mk VI revolver converted this way ?
Jimmy
|

02-18-2014, 04:00 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,170 Times in 7,411 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyj
Reference my post in the "S&W Antique" section "B/T .38spl / .32 S&W Long" Revolvers:
In the era of 1955 / 1956 I traded into a Webley Mk VI .455 Revolver that had been converted to .38 Special. IIRC the bore and chambers had been "Sleeved" ? I shot it quite a lot with factory (Western & Remington) 158 grain LRN ammo. It shot real low, so i filed the front sight down. Like all the other firearms I traded it off. Has anyone heard of any other Webley Mk VI revolver converted this way ?
Jimmy
|
No. Very strange. Ask about this on Gunboards in the British Gun Pub forum. If anyone knows, they will.
I'm quite interested in British martial arms and have read magazine ads since about 1957. I have NEVER seen anything like that advertised. Conversions were always in .45ACP. Some will fire .45 Auto Rim, too, but not all have the dimensions just right.
Last edited by Texas Star; 02-18-2014 at 04:22 PM.
|

02-18-2014, 04:08 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 4,081
Liked 3,722 Times in 1,476 Posts
|
|
Jimmy, I would have sworn that you went goofy again  and that a 38 Special was longer than the cylinder of a Mark VI. I went and dug my old Mk VI out and held a 38 cartridge alongside the cylinder and the cylinder is about 1/16" longer than the round. By the way, mine is one of those that were shaved for 45 acp so I guess that it's possible.
|

02-18-2014, 04:26 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,170 Times in 7,411 Posts
|
|
It's been done on .38/200 S&W's by Parker-Hale and by Cogswell & Harrison.
I have seen pics of MK VI Webleys in .22, but I think they had specal .22 cylinders. They were used for training. The barrels look skinny, too.
|

02-18-2014, 04:41 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,665
Likes: 1,781
Liked 17,778 Times in 4,635 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OFT II
Jimmy, I would have sworn that you went goofy again  and that a 38 Special was longer than the cylinder of a Mark VI. I went and dug my old Mk VI out and held a 38 cartridge alongside the cylinder and the cylinder is about 1/16" longer than the round. By the way, mine is one of those that were shaved for 45 acp so I guess that it's possible.
|
Hi:
The fellow that I got it from was a friend (Harry Klein) who's hobby was "Trading Guns". I in turn traded the Webley at "Uncle Abners Pawn Shop".
Later I went back to trade back for the Webley and discovered that
all the handguns were GONE ? The story was that Cuban Agents for Castro had went buying handguns for "Castro" to all the Town's Gun and Pawn Shops. I wonder if my Webley is still in Cuba?
|

02-18-2014, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 443
Liked 900 Times in 379 Posts
|
|
I have a Webley Mark IV in .38/200 and it also shoots low with .38 wadcutters in it. I read that the .38/200 load and bullet was heavier and slower than the .38 Spec so the .38 Spec. slug left the barrel quicker and the gun didn't have time to recoil up into postition. Kind of a counterintuitive thing.
|

02-18-2014, 05:43 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,192 Times in 3,622 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddogge
I have a Webley Mark IV in .38/200 and it also shoots low with .38 wadcutters in it. I read that the .38/200 load and bullet was heavier and slower than the .38 Spec so the .38 Spec. slug left the barrel quicker and the gun didn't have time to recoil up into postition. Kind of a counterintuitive thing.
|
You didn't actually shoot .38 Special in it, did you? If so, did the cases split? I didn't think the cylinder was long enough for Specials.
Those guns are chambered for the British version of .38 S&W, an ENTIRELY different cartridge.
Or did you reload the .38 S&W cases with .357 diameter wadcutters? if so, they're undersize, as I believe that the .38 S&W is actually .380 or close to it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

02-18-2014, 10:43 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Littleton, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 4,425
Liked 1,061 Times in 510 Posts
|
|
I understand it to be .359/.360.
__________________
and what his trumpet saith
|

02-19-2014, 01:59 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,093
Likes: 1,615
Liked 6,414 Times in 2,571 Posts
|
|
S&W made the .380/200 for the British, many of them had their chambers reamed out for 38 Special-Lee Harvey Oswald shot J. D. Tippit with one. "Sleeved"-? Hardly seems worth the effort. Only thing similar I know of are the 22 LR inserts for the S&W Model 53.
I have a No. 2 MkI, Hornady hollow based wadcutters gave good accuracy.
|

02-19-2014, 06:51 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,192 Times in 3,622 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicky4968
I understand it to be .359/.360.
|
I knew it wasn't .357. The story was strange and confusing as it was.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|