Ruger 9mm 1911

breadstick · Dec 31, 2016

Took the wife to the range with a friend of ours. We picked up our shield 9s today (review coming soon but amazing weapon) and he brought most of his guns. Had a lot of fun shooting them all, but his Ruger 9mm 1911 blew me away. Every part of it felt like an extension of my arm. I cannot believe how great this pistol felt. The slide, the trigger, the sights, everything felt simply amazing. My wife and I each have a bodyguard and shield 9 and they're both great in their own way (shield miles above bodyguard) but they don't compare to the 1911. I'll now be pinching my pennies to save for the 1911.

OKFC05 · Dec 31, 2016

I shot one of my student's lightweight Commander Ruger 1911 9mm this week, and was pleased with the accuracy and quality. I emptied it slowfire into the head of an IDPA target at 10 yds and got a group I could cover with my thumb. My student, who has tended to buy cheap guns an then swap them, said he is inspired to get good with this pistol and keep it. The only change I would make is an FO front sight for fast action pistol shooting.

Targets Guy · Dec 31, 2016

I really like my 1911 9mm. It is going to surpass my Shield in range trips next year I believe.

Shield 9mm

Ruger SR1911 9mm

speedyquad · Dec 31, 2016

I bought my first 1911 at the end of October. A ruger SR1911 in 45. It is my favorite now. i still carry my shield everyday though. The 1911 is just too big for me...for now...lol

breadstick · Dec 31, 2016

I see why. After one range trip, I can see why this is the benchmark for any gun made after it.

Faulkner · Jan 1, 2017

So, not being critical here, but I don't understand the attraction to a 9mm 1911. Seems to be a big gun for a smaller caliber than what the gun was designed for, kind of like chambering a M1 Garand in .223 . . . what's the purpose? Just asking.

CoronaDan · Jan 1, 2017

I picked up a Ruger LW Commander 9mm last August. And like breadstick I could not be more impressed! I actually prefer the Commander size to the full GI version, that 3/4 inch really makes a difference for me in terms of balance. Plus, it is just a fine looking pistol.

It is accurate, the trigger is wonderfully crisp, and it has been 100% reliable. What's not to like!

I must admit, I was initially a little nervous about spending so much on this pistol. Not any more.

dougb1946 · Jan 1, 2017

The Ruger Sr1911 commander in 9mm carries flat and after day 2, you just don't notice it is there. I looked at it in .45, then I compared ammo prices. I can shoot the 9mm a lot more. Ballistically, they are both pistol cartridges, and you can carry a couple of more 9mm than .45. The original 1911s were available in a lot of smaller calibers and a few bigger.
I like it, so I bought it. Tastes vary.
Wife was surprised. She first saw it when I showed her the holster I made for it. Gun was in the holster, and I never mentioned the gun. She almost said something, but wasn't sure.

Every man deserves one excellent gun, one fast car, one great dog. I had a fast car when I was a kid, I have a great dog now, and this is the best of the two guns I bought new.

Garand was designed as a .276 cal rifle.

OKFC05 · Jan 1, 2017

Faulkner said:
So, not being critical here, but I don't understand the attraction to a 9mm 1911. Seems to be a big gun for a smaller caliber than what the gun was designed for, kind of like chambering a M1 Garand in .223 . . . what's the purpose? Just asking.

Ah, a teachable moment; here's some history for you. Browning originally designed his pistol for .38 ACP, which is a 9mm. The US Army demanded all pistols be submitted in .45, and they were. Even Lugers were made in .45 for the trial. The Browning was selected in .45 ACP and became the US Army pistol.
And by the way, the Garand was originally designed in .276, and was redesigned to use the .30/06 the Army had stored in great quantity.

A lightweight Commander in 9mm is closer to Browning's original pistol, and is easier to carry and shoot than the .45 he sold to the army. And if you ever get a chance to shoot an AR in 6.8mm you'll see why John Garand chose a similar caliber for his rifle that the army changed to .30/06 for logistics reasons.

We don't always know what we think we know. There is also a backstory about how we got the Beretta 9mm M9 to seal a deal for Italy to buy F16s.

okiegtrider · Jan 1, 2017

Good things about the Ruger 1911 pistols just keep showing up around here. I may have to pick one up this year.

JaPes · Jan 1, 2017

Faulkner said:
So, not being critical here, but I don't understand the attraction to a 9mm 1911. Seems to be a big gun for a smaller caliber than what the gun was designed for, kind of like chambering a M1 Garand in .223 . . . what's the purpose? Just asking.

I own a 1911 chambered in .45 ACP and another chambered in 9mm. My purpose for owning a 9mm 1911? Fun. All the 1911 positive aspects, soft shooting, and relatively affordable range practice ammo. I also use it to introduce new shooters to center fire cartridges. I use a .22lr rimfire to work on basics, gauge the individual's proclivity to following commands and safety rules, and get them acclimated to firing a pistol. Having a very soft shooting 9mm center fire aides in this. Then move them up to a double stack and progress upwards.

I will say that even though a 9mm 1911 is a joy to shoot, it doesn't replace the physical and visceral experience of shooting a well made 1911 chambered for .45 ACP.

holo · Jan 1, 2017

The wife got me a gift card to the lgs for xmas i looked long and hard at the Ruger but bought Kimber Custom ll instead the Kimber was also $60.00 cheaper. I fell in love with the 1911 9mm after buying and old Star 9mm from a guy at a show for $180.00 The 1911 9mm is just a blast to shoot. Enjoy

breadstick · Jan 1, 2017

I certainly plan on it. Just have to work the funds first. It's a few more pennies than the shield 9.

Wee Hooker · Jan 1, 2017

that's because nothing compares to a 1911

JaPes · Jan 1, 2017

Wee Hooker said:
that's because nothing compares to a 1911

For a .45 ACP 1911, no.

For a 9mm 1911, there is a contender.

Targets Guy · Jan 1, 2017

Faulkner said:
So, not being critical here, but I don't understand the attraction to a 9mm 1911. Seems to be a big gun for a smaller caliber than what the gun was designed for, kind of like chambering a M1 Garand in .223 . . . what's the purpose? Just asking.

I have owned and shot three .45 ACP 1911 pistols and now one 1911 9mm. Traded the full sized Ruger 1911 .45 for the new 9mm. I just like it better than the full sized .45. I still have the lightweight SR1911 commander, the RIA compact .45 and now the lightweight SR1911 9mm. Best of both worlds. Plus with the 9mm I now have a 10 round 1911.

CustomChevyGuy · Jan 1, 2017

love hearing all the great stories/reviews on the Ruger 1911..i've handled a couple, that felt very nice, but haven't had a chance to fire one..

CoronaDan · Jan 2, 2017

Funny....was at the range yesterday with my two favorite 9mm's - Ruger 1911 LW Commander and my cosmetically challenged S&W 909.

One I paid full retail and the other I stole for $150.

Ironically, both are single stacks, both are about the same size and weight. And nearly as accurate at 20 feet! The Ruger tends to group a little left and the Smith a little low and left.

I love them both! Will trade neither. The Ruger 1911 has the most fantastic trigger. Even in SA, the Smith has a lot of slack. Both are wonderful pistols and worth every penny I have in them.

joeintexas · Jan 2, 2017

Shot 100 rounds today with the Ruger SR 1911 in 45 acp. It is a pleasure to shoot, I wouldn't mind having one in 9mm. For the price range Ruger did good with this one.

LEO918 · Jan 2, 2017

I've had my Ruger SR1911 LWCMD in 9mm since July and like it better every day.

Ruger 9mm 1911

Member

Member

US Veteran

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

US Veteran

Member

Member

Member

US Veteran

Member

Member

US Veteran

SWCA Member

Similar threads