Remington R1 vs Springfield Armory Milspec

Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
1,405
Reaction score
2,021
Location
Chester County, PA
I’m looking at the Remington R1 and Springfield Armory Milspec (regular Milspec model and Defender version). Does anyone have any opinions on one over the other? I know the Remington is a 80 series with flat mainspring housing and dovetail sights. I also know the Springfield is a 70 series with curved mainspring housing and a staked front sight. The Remington frame is casted and the Springfield is forged.
 
Register to hide this ad
I'm very happy with my SA Milspec. I've never handled an R1 so cannot comment. It boils down to series 80 or series 70. Anything else can be easily changed up, mainspring housing, short VS long trigger, firing pins etc. One area people seem to be very pleased with is Springfield Armory's warranty & customer service. I've never had the need to utilize it but I have heard very good things, not sure about Remington these days.
 
Last edited:
I have a R1, blued, .45ACP, I bought it new, now it has 500 rounds shot through it, its a very nice gun, I had some issues with the original magazines, FTF issues, I replaced them with original GI issue magazines and its all ok now.It gives decent groups at 25yds with standard 230gr FMJ, off hand 4" ,for 5 shots,be sure to have the low front sight mounted, because, if not, if it has the tall one, at 25yds it shoots 3,5" low of point of aim!!!!, at 10 yds it is dead on with the high profile sight, about the same at 15yds from 20yds on it hits very low, you must compensate!!!
 
I will give the standard forum reply when choosing between two good guns. get them both. I did. To be truthful, I shoot the Milspec more often probably because of the finish, but they both perform very reliably and accurately. One detail that I did not know before I bought them was that they work best with 7 round magazines. The larger magazines that I have used, block the receiver from returning to battery. I am sure there are larger capacity magazines that work, I just do not know what they are, and as they are range weapons (so far), it has not really mattered.
 

Attachments

  • 45ACPRemingtonR11911.jpg
    45ACPRemingtonR11911.jpg
    48 KB · Views: 62
  • 45ACPSPRMILSPECB.jpg
    45ACPSPRMILSPECB.jpg
    83.5 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:
I ordered the Springfield Armory Mil-Spec model. The only thing I plan on doing is switching out the grips and replacing the stainless barrel bushing with a blued or parkerized one. I ordered the parkerized “non-defender” model.
 
I have a new R1 commander. its at a GS right now. It wouldnt even begin to feed HPs. The manual does recommend FMJ though. My Springfield Mil spec does fine. This is a bit older mil spec GI model, dont think they make it anymore.
 
Never handled a Remington. But I have shot the SA milspec and really liked it. And SA is a good company Ti deal with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Personally, I'd be willing to roll the dice with Remington, but then again, I feel that Springfield Armory is overpriced considering that it's basically just the big name equivalent of European-American Armory, Zenith, or Tri-Star. Just an importer using the name of a defunct US Military Armory and charging a premium for said name.

So yeah, if I'm going to pay for a name, then I'd rather it be Remington, and from what I hear their 1911s are just rebranded Para Ordnance 1911s, so that's a darn good 1911 for the price, made by a well-known North American firearms company.
 
Remington = CAST

Springfield = FORGED

Need any thing else be said?

How about a tangible explanation regarding what practical difference that actually makes when it comes to modern manufacturing in terms of function/longevity, backed by current documented facts rather than assumption, supposition, or outdated anecdotal evidence?
 
Last edited:
Personally, I'd be willing to roll the dice with Remington, but then again, I feel that Springfield Armory is overpriced considering that it's basically just the big name equivalent of European-American Armory, Zenith, or Tri-Star. Just an importer using the name of a defunct US Military Armory and charging a premium for said name.

So yeah, if I'm going to pay for a name, then I'd rather it be Remington, and from what I hear their 1911s are just rebranded Para Ordnance 1911s, so that's a darn good 1911 for the price, made by a well-known North American firearms company.

S.A. 1911's are made in Illinois with forged frames and slides done in the U.S.A. You have to go back 7 or 8 years ago when they were using frames and slides by Imbel in Brazil, and further back then that when the whole pistol was by Imbel. And those are well made 1911's.
The polymer framed XD series are made in Croatia. Originally and still sold in Europe as the HS2000.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top