I Bought Another Taurus.

CajunBass

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
6,610
Reaction score
14,235
Location
North Chesterfield, Va.
Yes, it's true. You'd think I'd know better than to come here and admit it, but I bought another Taurus. I had a little I-frame, 32 Long that I bought just for giggles, but it turned out I kinda liked the little thing. It was too small for me to really shoot, so I thought about one of the new Lipsey's J-frames but didn't want to (1) Pay that much for something I might not like, and (2) wait for one to show up at the LGS.

So I ordered a Taurus 327 from Bud's. A steel frame, six shot, 327 Magnum, about the size of a J-frame, it fits the same holsters as my 642 anyway. It's got sort of an ugly flat black finish, but I wasn't expecting a Model 27 for around $300. Excuse the dust.

T327R.jpg


T327L.jpg


The trigger isn't bad. Not as nice as a Model 15, or even my 642, but it's smooth, if a little heavy. The S/A is about 6.5 or 7, but I don't use the S/A much if at all so that doesn't bother me.

The front sight is pinned in so you can replace if if you want to. They sell a night sight that I may order, but for now some orange nail polish takes care of it.

The grips surprised me. They're typical ugly rubber grips, but they work. Quite comfortable for me anyway. I can get two full fingers on them, with the pinky on there, but sort of half off. About like most guns this size.

How does it shoot? Well, pretty well for me shooting it. Someone else would do a lot better I suppose. I've put 175 rounds through it, mostly Fiocchi 32 S&W Long. Fifty wadcutters, and 100 rounds of 97 grain FMJ at an advertised velocity of 948 FPS. Pretty hot little load apparently. The other 25 were Hornady Critical Defense 80 grain FTX, 327 Magnum rounds. I had heard/read that this stuff was "snappy" and "loud". I didn't find it to be too snappy at all, but the Taurus is a steel frame gun that weighs about a 23 ounces on my cheap Wheeler trigger scale. (On the other hand my 642 weighs about a pound and kicks like a mule with 158 grain P+ 38's). I expected a really LOUD report from what I'd read, but I didn't think it was any more objectional than anything else being fired on the line at the range that morning. No one even glanced my way.

For accuracy, I can only say I didn't shoot it any worse than I do any other small frame revolver. If I took my time and lined up the sights, and got a good trigger release, I hit where I wanted to. If on the other hand I got sloppy, so did my groups.

So that's my report. It doesn't seem to be too bad for the money. Only time and rounds will tell anything else. I've got dies, shell holders, bullets and stuff inbound. It will mostly see 32 Long ammo I suppose. I've got a bit of that brass saved up already.

Oh and it has no lock, and uses a transfer bar type system.

Edited to correct math mistake, and a typo.
 
Last edited:
I only have one Taurus; a PT1911 that has just been a really fine handgun. I'm not fond of the finish on your Taurus, but it does appear to be durable and utilitarian. I've been wanting another .32 revolver, so I may have to take a look at the Taurus. I have a S&W 31-1 and a H&R 733 which are both steel frame guns in .32 S&W L. Think I would like to have a .32 magnum.

H&R 733.jpg
31-1.1.jpg
 
Nice review

I'm all in on Taurus for the past 20 years. Certainly had reserved feelings prior to the millennium but they certainly have not disappointed since.
Based on your report, you done good.
 
Last edited:
No, the finish isn't great, but for what it cost, and what I'll use it for it's acceptable.

Taurus can put out a nice blue finish. This Tracker 44 was made in 2015. I wish I'd held onto this gun, but I did replace it with a Model 29.

Taurus_Tracker_.jpg


I've owned well over a dozen Taurus revolvers over the years. Never had a problem with any.
 
I carry an 85 Ultralite in a dark gloss blue with 5 Nyclad 38+P. It's a perfect utilitarian all time carry for me. I believe I changed out the springs too. I'm glad the OP likes his new toy too!
 
My first purpose purchased "carry gun" was a Taurus 85 UL (I think that's what it was called anyway). It had a factory bobbed hammer. Beautiful little gun with finish about like the 44 Magnum above. Another gun I should have kept.
 
Congratulations on the new addition to the family

I have owned and been shooting the Taurus products for more than two decades now.

I find them to be quite nice, very good and in configurations that Smith and Wesson does not offer. I actually very much like they're total titanium firearms

My 2 favorites are both L frame sized revolvers that weigh in at about 19 - 20 ounces. One is chambered in 41 Magnum and a second in 45 Long Colt. They carry very nicely all day long

The 45 Long Colt revolver is finished in what Taurus calls shadow Gray

Taurus%20450Ls.jpg


450 bullets.jpg
 
Last edited:
Congratulations on the 327. I own a 856UL and an 856ULCH. Both have been great. I put a Wolff spring kit in the ULCH. Made a lot of difference in trigger pull. The Taurus night sight is well worth it. Inexpensive too.
 
Very nice.

I own two Taurus firearms myself, both excellent guns. I don't like their matte black finish either, so I always opt for Stainless Steel.

attachment.php

Taurus 4510 Judge Magnum with Altamont Super Rosewood Grips.

attachment.php

Taurus PT92AFS-D.

One thing which intrigues me is that you say your 327 has no lock? Are you certain of that? Taurus usually puts their lock on the hammer itself.

attachment.php


I actually prefer this arrangement to that of the Smith & Wesson frame lock and wish that they would adopt Taurus' hammer lock since it's more out of the way and doesn't affect the aesthetics.
 
Maybe somebody will offer a kit so you can add one and have something to complain about. :)

Congratulations on a neat little revolver. I think the door is wide open for Taurus to eat Colt and S&W's lunch in the revolver market.

That won't work. I'm too lazy to try to beat the locks, so I just learned to ignore them.

Worked so far.
 
I have an older, blued Taurus 445 in .44 Special that I really like. Sold to a friend years ago, and basically had to beg him to buy it back. Has a really nice blued finish, and shoots as well as my J frames.
 
I work part-time in a gun shop. We have 5-shot Taurus revolvers on display right next to S&W 5-shot revolvers.

Frankly, the display is embarrassing for S&W...

Eons ago I went to my LGS for a Chief's special. The clerk pulled one out of the cabinet, along with a Taurus 85. The Taurus had a transfer bar, and the fit and finish was awesome. The price was lower. He recommended it. I bought it.

Years go by and I still can't hit the broadside with it. Tried all kinds of different loads. Chalked it up to a 2" barrel.

Many years later I came across a Chief's in immaculate condition. Broadside? NO, a tack driver.

I suggest the dealer put targets under the revolvers. S&W surely wouldn't be embarrassed now.
 
Congratulations on the new addition to the family

I have owned and been shooting the Taurus products for more than two decades now.

I find them to be quite nice, very good and in configurations that Smith and Wesson does not offer. I actually very much like they're total titanium firearms

My 2 favorites are both L frame sized revolvers that weigh in at about 19 - 20 ounces. One is chambered in 41 Magnum and a second in 45 Long Colt. They carry very nicely all day long

The 45 Long Colt revolver is finished in what Taurus calls shadow Gray

Taurus%20450Ls.jpg


450 bullets.jpg

Now that's a scary view I hope to never see in person!! :)
Great photo!
 
Yep. No lock on this one. I think they stopped it several years ago. I've owned a couple that had them, none recently.

Not so, as my PT92 was manufactured in December of 2022, yet it still has a lock.
 
Very nice.

I own two Taurus firearms myself, both excellent guns. I don't like their matte black finish either, so I always opt for Stainless Steel.

attachment.php

Taurus 4510 Judge Magnum with Altamont Super Rosewood Grips.

attachment.php

Taurus PT92AFS-D.

One thing which intrigues me is that you say your 327 has no lock? Are you certain of that? Taurus usually puts their lock on the hammer itself.

attachment.php


I actually prefer this arrangement to that of the Smith & Wesson frame lock and wish that they would adopt Taurus' hammer lock since it's more out of the way and doesn't affect the aesthetics.

I've got the same PT 92. My first 9mm. Only negative is the safety flicks off way too easy so I would never carry it cocked and locked.
 
Last edited:
That's a shame, mine has a very positive safety which engages/disengages with the same amount of pressure.
 
Back
Top