|
|
04-14-2024, 05:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 811
Likes: 418
Liked 869 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
Browning & Remington pocket pistols
Hello all
I picked up a Browning 380 and a Remington 32
Recently. Two very clean examples. Been lucky locally for VG condition guns lately.
I have a 7.65 barrel coming for the Browning I will see how that works out.
Have not shot either on, I know the Remington parts are not available, I hope I don't turn it into a paper weight.
Thanks for looking.
Mike
|
The Following 17 Users Like Post:
|
4T5GUY, 625-10scc, adwjc, alwslate, Darkenfast, desi2358, Echo40, Eric300, hannstv, jframejoey, Jimmyjones, LVSteve, Malysh, Muley Gil, OLDSTER, TJm15.38, turnerriver |
04-14-2024, 06:22 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,141
Likes: 28,013
Liked 34,003 Times in 5,313 Posts
|
|
Very cool guns!
Where did you find a .32 barrel for the Browning? I have the same gun.
__________________
“What you got, ain’t new.”
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2024, 06:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 811
Likes: 418
Liked 869 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
Barrell
Found on ebay.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-14-2024, 07:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 1,541
Liked 5,624 Times in 1,626 Posts
|
|
That's a very clean Remington PA51. They are actually more scarce in .32 ACP than in .380, the opposite of production numbers from Colt and Savage for their pocket autos of the period from about 1903-1930. If you haven't had the pleasure of taking one apart before there are several good YouTube videos showing how. Don't try and remove the grip panels or take apart the frame.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2024, 07:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 811
Likes: 418
Liked 869 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
Takedown
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Rego
That's a very clean Remington PA51. They are actually more scarce in .32 ACP than in .380, the opposite of production numbers from Colt and Savage for their pocket autos of the period from about 1903-1930. If you haven't had the pleasure of taking one apart before there are several good YouTube videos showing how. Don't try and remove the grip panels or take apart the frame.
|
I watched some videos on takedown, haven't did that yet.
Thanks
|
04-14-2024, 07:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,271
Likes: 24,930
Liked 29,782 Times in 11,064 Posts
|
|
I have the modern 9mm Remington R51. Disassembly is "interesting".
__________________
Release the Kraken
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2024, 07:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 251
Liked 29,449 Times in 14,220 Posts
|
|
The new Remington 51 operates much the same as the original Model 51. If anything, it is more difficult to disassemble and reassemble. The new 51 never caught on, and I think the early production new models were recalled for some reason I don't remember. I had a friend who owned a new Model 51, and I am very familiar with it. I have one each of the original 51s (.32 and .380). There are two variants of each. General Patton owned a Model 51 in .380. An interesting fact is that during WWI, the U.S. Navy considered adopting a Remington pistol of the exact same unique design chambered in .45 ACP which was called the Model 53. But that did not happen. A few of those Model 53 .45 pistols do exist.
Last edited by DWalt; 04-14-2024 at 08:00 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2024, 08:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Escaping CA to OR in 2024
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 1,185
Liked 1,510 Times in 601 Posts
|
|
Browning's attempt to turn the Model 1955 in to a "target pistol" and meet GCA68 requirements -
IMG_0989.jpg
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2024, 08:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,271
Likes: 24,930
Liked 29,782 Times in 11,064 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
The new Remington 51 operates much the same as the original Model 51. If anything, it is more difficult to disassemble and reassemble. The new 51 never caught on, and I think the early production new models were recalled for some reason I don't remember. I had a friend who owned a new Model 51, and I am very familiar with it. I have one each of the original 51s (.32 and .380). There are two variants of each. General Patton owned a Model 51 in .380. An interesting fact is that during WWI, the U.S. Navy considered adopting a Remington pistol of the exact same unique design chambered in .45 ACP which was called the Model 53. But that did not happen. A few of those Model 53 .45 pistols do exist.
|
The first R51s were jammomatics. The hesitation lock system requires close attention to geometry to work with a relatively high pressure cartridge like 9x19. As a result Big Green pulled them from the market.
There was a later release of R51s that worked a LOT better. I own one. However, the damage to sales was already done, and when the RP9 fullsize pistol also got vilified online by certain reviewers, Big Green couldn't give its pistols away. Bankruptcy followed.
The newer R51s still had an issue if you tried to load them +1. When fully loaded, the stack of rounds in the mag is tighter than on most pistols. You can barely push down the stack at all, where most other pistol mags give you some play, usually 25-50% of the cartridge diameter. Shortening the legs on the mag followers has worked for many people, though some still report issues. I suspect the strange recoil impulse creates cycling issues for some people due to their grip.
I plan to shorten the follower legs on my mags just to see if it will +1 reliably. I warn those with hand issues that the recoil impulse is harsh with 124 gr ammo and almost straight back into your bones because of the action type and the very low bore axis.
__________________
Release the Kraken
Last edited by LVSteve; 04-14-2024 at 08:42 PM.
|
04-14-2024, 11:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 251
Liked 29,449 Times in 14,220 Posts
|
|
The R51 I mentioned that belonged to a friend was one of the later versions and seemed to fire and function OK. But it was almost a two person job to re-assemble it. Once was enough for me. I nearly bought a used R51 but after negotiating on a price with the seller, he decided he wanted more so I walked away.
|
04-15-2024, 03:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,578
Likes: 1,193
Liked 18,561 Times in 7,346 Posts
|
|
I have a modern R51 chambered in 9mm.
I bought it just because it was pretty much NIB, it was fairly cheap, and it is somewhat of an oddity that was only produced for a relatively short time before Remington went bankrupt.
I've only taken it to the range once, and it had some jamming issues.
One of these days I'll spend some more time with it and try to sort it out.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns & money...
|
04-15-2024, 11:11 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 36,958
Liked 944 Times in 502 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsf
Browning's attempt to turn the Model 1955 in to a "target pistol" and meet GCA68 requirements -
Attachment 677344
|
I had one of those. Actually, a nice handling gun, easy to shoot with those big sights........... Kind of defeated the whole idea of being a concealed carry gun though! Considered replacing the thumb rest grips with smooth ones but since I had other guns to carry sold it to a guy who was starting a collection of Browning and FN models.
|
04-15-2024, 01:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,271
Likes: 24,930
Liked 29,782 Times in 11,064 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
The R51 I mentioned that belonged to a friend was one of the later versions and seemed to fire and function OK. But it was almost a two person job to re-assemble it. Once was enough for me. I nearly bought a used R51 but after negotiating on a price with the seller, he decided he wanted more so I walked away.
|
I got mine when Bud's were letting them go for under $200. I have a fascination for weapons with unusual operating systems. The "hesitation lock" definitely qualifies.
__________________
Release the Kraken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-15-2024, 01:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,271
Likes: 24,930
Liked 29,782 Times in 11,064 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
I have a modern R51 chambered in 9mm.
I bought it just because it was pretty much NIB, it was fairly cheap, and it is somewhat of an oddity that was only produced for a relatively short time before Remington went bankrupt.
I've only taken it to the range once, and it had some jamming issues.
One of these days I'll spend some more time with it and try to sort it out.
|
I was braced for multiple jams when I took mine to the range. I had one stoppage in about 80 rounds. No more range trips with it until I shorten the the follower legs. I also need to see if I have any 115 gr ammo in my stash. Recoil is quite stout with S&B 124 gr.
__________________
Release the Kraken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-15-2024, 07:25 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,483
Likes: 18,748
Liked 22,560 Times in 8,314 Posts
|
|
Never had the opportunity to have a Remington. I always thought they looked like they would fit your hand very well.
I've had a couple of the Browning .380's and really liked them, (also the .25's).
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-15-2024, 07:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 3,604
Liked 4,976 Times in 1,508 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hardknocks
I have a 7.65 barrel coming for the Browning I will see how that works out.
|
Be advised that the .32 barrel may need to be fit. I got a .32 barrel for my first 1910/55 and it did not just drop in. I didn’t mess with it and traded all off, (explaining the barrel fitment or lack of.)
A few years ago I got a complete package w/a .32 barrel. Sweet. Get a piece of 3/4” ID garden hose, 4-6”s long to press against the barrel bushing. It makes it easy to turn the bushing the 1/4 turn.
Don’t let you wife or significant hold the PA51. Unfortunately I showed my wife my 1922 .32 when I first got it. She decided it was hers because it fit her hand perfectly. Of course it did since hand studies were done before it was ever designed and developed.
Jim
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-15-2024, 07:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 811
Likes: 418
Liked 869 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
32 acp
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4T5GUY
Be advised that the .32 barrel may need to be fit. I got a .32 barrel for my first 1910/55 and it did not just drop in. I didn’t mess with it and traded all off, (explaining the barrel fitment or lack of.)
A few years ago I got a complete package w/a .32 barrel. Sweet. Get a piece of 3/4” ID garden hose, 4-6”s long to press against the barrel bushing. It makes it easy to turn the bushing the 1/4 turn.
Don’t let you wife or significant hold the PA51. Unfortunately I showed my wife my 1922 .32 when I first got it. She decided it was hers because it fit her hand perfectly. Of course it did since hand studies were done before it was ever designed and developed.
Jim
|
I'm confident I can get the 32 barrel to fit.
If not I will have fun trying.
Thanks
|
04-16-2024, 10:27 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 225
Liked 1,328 Times in 361 Posts
|
|
I own two Remington 51s, both in 380. Some reproduction parts are available, like firing pins and ejector and the like.
The one part that is very hard to find is the breech block. I had one break on one of my models. I thought that would be a permanent paper weight. But, after looking online off and on for over seven years, one came up for sale on Numrich and I grabbed it quick! It works fine once again.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-17-2024, 07:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 811
Likes: 418
Liked 869 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
New used barrel 7.65
The 7.65 FN barrel arrived, almost direct drop in.
With Some 800 sandpaper wrapped in a credit card it took less than 5 minutes to smooth out the
Edges so it would twist into the slots in the frame, need to see if it runs asap.
Feed ramp to barrel fit looks great.
I'll let you all know the results.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-17-2024, 09:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 7,747
Liked 7,455 Times in 2,528 Posts
|
|
Very cool Remington Model 51, it's a shame that when Remington got the bright idea to revive it they didn't just leave it chambered in .380 ACP, but instead attempted to use the Pederson action designed for the lower pressure .32 ACP/.380 ACP in a variation of the Model 51 chambered in 9mm.
__________________
Shooting Comfort is bilateral.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-30-2024, 05:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 811
Likes: 418
Liked 869 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
Results
The 1910 works perfect with the 32acp barrel, three brands of ammo.
The Remington also works great and very easy to shoot accurately.
2 Kool guns.
|
05-01-2024, 01:01 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 7,272
Likes: 19,076
Liked 11,217 Times in 3,351 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hardknocks
The 7.65 FN barrel arrived, almost direct drop in.
With Some 800 sandpaper wrapped in a credit card it took less than 5 minutes to smooth out the
Edges so it would twist into the slots in the frame, need to see if it runs asap.
Feed ramp to barrel fit looks great.
I'll let you all know the results.
|
I’m a little confused, which is extremely easy to do, but how do you do this?
Larry
__________________
Miss Buddies crsides & fat tom
|
05-01-2024, 05:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 811
Likes: 418
Liked 869 Times in 257 Posts
|
|
How do you do that
Hi all
Hard part = find a Browning or FN barrel 32acp not beat to heck.
Remove 380 barrel and install 32acp barrel.
It may drop in or need some sanding and stoning.
It worked for me your experience may be different. I'm no gunsmith. I found info Browning made the barrels to interchange ? But no info the gun was sold with both barrels.
The genius of John Browning probably planned this out.
A guy on YouTube did the swap, his was a little more work.
The 1910 for me is no fun with 380.
Good luck.
Last edited by hardknocks; 05-01-2024 at 06:00 PM.
|
05-01-2024, 07:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,224
Likes: 403
Liked 5,157 Times in 1,656 Posts
|
|
I owned one of the second run R51s and got it to run reliably after Rem replaced the original mags. It was fun to shoot and a royal pain to clean. About the time I got confident enough to carry it I won a Shield in a raffle and pedaled the R51.
Wife and I each own an RM380 which as a DAO is to my mind the ideal for pocket carry. Hers is her EDC. Mine is limited to preventing nakedness at fancy occasions.
Carried a war trophy .32 Browning 1922 off duty for a few months. Needed new springs. Wife decided I needed a new gun. 45 years years later still don't need a new wife.
__________________
I need ammo, not a ride.
|
05-10-2024, 06:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 2,351
Liked 4,677 Times in 1,603 Posts
|
|
Some years back picked up this Remington M51 .380, s/n puts it at c.1919.
Surprisingly accurate, but really don't shoot it much. The Pederson design was genius.
__________________
Ret'd LEO
SWCA #2275
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|