38/44 Ammo, too shoot or not to shoot? WITH PICS.

dacoontz

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
2,459
Reaction score
1,071
Location
Southern Oregon
Posted a picture of this ammo in an earlier thread. Got the ammo today and I think this stuff may be too expensive to shoot, but I really want to load it in my Heavy Duty and see if I can shoot through a frying pan. Any opinions on the value of this full box of vintage ammo?
 

Attachments

  • DSC04602.JPG
    DSC04602.JPG
    157.2 KB · Views: 864
  • DSC04603.JPG
    DSC04603.JPG
    171.2 KB · Views: 667
  • DSC04604.JPG
    DSC04604.JPG
    204 KB · Views: 618
  • DSC04606.JPG
    DSC04606.JPG
    106.2 KB · Views: 717
Register to hide this ad
Do you plan on your house being invaded by frying pans??:rolleyes:

....so, I'm walking down a dark ally and am approached by two rough looking frying pans..........:rolleyes:
 
I may be wrong, but I don't think that is 38/44 ammo. I think that is called "metal piercing 38.

If the frying pan is made in China, you could probably kill it with a wadcutter.
 
If you just bought the ammo, then it is worth whatever you paid for it.

If it were me, I'd probably shoot 5 or 6 rounds to see what it is like, with at least one into your frying pan. Then, save the empties; put them back in the box.
 
If the box is complete, it will be worth alot more left that way then if you fire even one round.

Shooting this ammo will not be spectacular. I've used a good deal of it in the past an it's thoroghly unremarkable.

You want to shoot something jazzy, try a box of SuperVels.

Who would eat off a Chinese Frying pan? Best shoot it just to be sure.
 
I remember those...I had some on a Bianchi speed strip "in case I wanted to reload to shoot through something"....at least, that was my thinking at the time. They also came in a ..357 version....Troopers polished them up and carried them in the cartridge loops on their belt....

I found one of my old 38 KTW rounds the other day as well...I have one left, I might as well shoot a frying pan with it too
 
Last edited:
My friend and I shot an iron frying pan with a cap and ball revolver and it went right through it. It was in 1972, so the odds are good it was a USA made skillet.

I'd save the ammo.
 
In all fairness I would also be willing to shoot through a skillet, wok, dutch oven, or other cooking utensil without any prejudice or bias. I think I will actually save the ammo for awhile and see what else I can find just in case it becomes valuable. I have some other "hi-velocity" ammo coming my way that I believe is more modern and still likely to pierce some metal. Thanks for the opinions, I think. :D
 
I may be wrong, but I don't think that is 38/44 ammo. I think that is called "metal piercing 38.

moosedog is right, that's just a 38 Special load variation. I may still have a box of it. I know I used to.

38/44 ammo was labeled as just that, "38/44" or as 38 Hi Speed. I've read it was rated as shooting a 158g bullet at about 1100 fps. Think of it as the +P+ of the 1930s. (smile)

Dave
 
Send it to Bill Pattison, he'll take proper care of it. We can then name his as the official historian and caretaker of any .38/44 ammo anyone comes up with. He won't mind, I'm sure.
 
Fairly Valuable

The a full box 38 Spl. metal piercing ammo would bring about $75.00 at most gun shows... on an internet auction it might well bring more...I'd say considerably less if the box is not full...

I suggest you hold on to it... it isn't likely to lose any value, and probably will appreciate....

FWIW

Chuck
 
One of the most popular on-line auctions is Ward's Collectibles. Below is one of the last auction's items which received no bids, despite the fact that it is a not-often-seen item. Did the fact that it is missing a couple of rounds impact it? Maybe, but old ammo isn't going for quite what most folks think it should go for at the present time.
I think their next auction starts the first of February and it is a good place to pick up some very desirable ammo to go with a particular gun. Just FYI.
Ed

https://www.wardscollectibles.com/viewitem.php?item=2648
 
I would also like to respectfully disagree with the notion that this is not ".38/44" ammunition. A Western Rifle and Pistol Ammunition Handbook from 1935 lists their Super-X .38 Special Metal Piercing round, 150 grain Conical at 1,050 fps. I have one of the pre-war boxes and it specifically lists the Smith & Wesson .38-44 revolver. Winchester's load of the same period is rated at 170 fps higher than the Western load, a few years before they merged.
Ed
 
smith17,

I was basing my comments on having had a box of that stuff at one time and not remembering any mention on it of being a 38/44 load. Likewise I've seen different boxes labeled "38/44" and "38 HiSpeed". If your catalog claims this stuff is 38/44 ammo then I was wrong. If it's OK I'll beat myself up later. (LOL)

Dave
 
Dave:
No reason to beat yourself up. By the time dacoontz' box of ammo was manufactured (post 1961), the sales of the N frame .38 special was insignificant and there was no reason to mention it on the ammo box. Plus, the N frame wasn't the only revolver from S&W able to handle that load in the 60s. I find it interesting that 30+ years after its introduction, that ammo still was within about 10fps of the original Western load.
Ed
 
Send it to Bill Pattison, he'll take proper care of it. We can then name his as the official historian and caretaker of any .38/44 ammo anyone comes up with. He won't mind, I'm sure.


Good thought, but I think I will keep it for myself and not shoot it unless I get overcome by some home invading frying pans. Hey, it could happen. And I am sure Bill will understand if I don't package them up and send them his way just yet.
 
Daniel,
Anytime you want to send it go ahead, but I have some myself also:
standard.jpg

standard.jpg

Dick, good idea!:D
Ed, I agree with you. I think that even though they stopped making 38/44 head stamp ammo, that the dogbone 38 Special was still hotter than what they started with.
Bill
 
Back
Top