Disappointed with Accuracy

[jollymon32]

My 11 year old son and I like to compete with a dueling tree. Basically, it is a reactive steel target with the paddles swinging from one side to the other as they are hit. There are a total of 6 paddles, and when the game starts, there are three on each side.

After each shooter shooting 10 rounds, the shooter with the most paddles on their side looses.

My son continuously beats me at this game!

So I took his Savage Arms Mark II to the range and compared it to my 15-22.

I was able to knock out the bulls eye section clear off the target; the grouping was so tight with the Savage Arms rifle.

With the 15-22, the groupings were close, but nothing like the Savage Arms rifle. I had several flyers whick made the grouping look like a splatter pattern compared to the nice tight grouping of the savage arms.

I now understand why he is beating me so soundly at the dueling tree.

Being new to the sport, I don't understand why the big difference in accuracy.

So, the savage arms has a longer barrel and it is a bolt rifle. The guys at the range say that a bolt action rifle is much more accurate than a semi auto.

I am bummed out that my son has a much more accurate rifle!

Any suggestions on a semi-auto, 'tactical' type of 22LR rifle with accuracy like the Savage arms?

Thanks from a newbie....

Andrew

 

[stevelee24]

there is a m&p version thats a performance model i think that has better accuracy
but if its just an accurate rifle you want then why by a fun gun like and m&p there hardly sharp shooting guns

saying that i find mine very accurate with a good scope well for a tactical .22 it is

 

[ChattanoogaPhil]

Yes, that's quite typical. My $99 Savage puts smaller groups on paper at 100 yards than my $450 15-22 at 50 yards. But I didn't buy the 15-22 for precision shooting.

Suggestions for other .22 black rifles? American Rifleman did a comparison of all the black rifles in their Dec issue. The Ruger, Remington and Sig522 performed well. Here is my Sig522 SWAT with a 4x scope at 50 yards slung over my range bag



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

[Smith357]

The first thing to look at is your ammunition. .22s are extremely ammo sensitive, one ammo may shoot great out of one rifle and very poorly out of another. Check out a bunch of different ammo an see which one your 15-22 likes best.

The other thing is Savage makes a very accurate rifle, you are going to be hard pressed to find any out of the box semi auto that can compete with it for less than double the cost of the Savage. If you want to compete with a bolt action .22 your best bet is to get a bolt action .22, I recommend a CZ 452 to compete with the Savage.

 

[OKFC05]

A friend practically got hysterical when I called his military styled .22 autoloader a plinker, but it is less accurate than a 50-year-old Browning lightweight .22 autoloader I have.
You can get any number of bolt actions that will outshoot one.
A CZ, Kimber, Savage or Anschutz target bolt rifle will put all the bullets in one hole at 50 yrd off a rest for less money. For $2000, you can get a custom competition .22 autoloader based on the Ruger action that will not be quite as accurate as the bolt guns.

So whatever the 15-22 may be (bunch of fun) it is not even close to being a target rifle, and all those huge high power scopes some put on them is ridiculous. Set up a row of 6" plates at 50yds, use whatever ammo you find it likes best, and mow 'em down. Don't get in an accuracy contest with a bolt action. I have a 617 revolver that is as accurate as the 15-22.

 

[the_new_guy]

Yup,
While the S&W 15-22 is accurate in its own right, it wasn't really meant for precision shooting (PM excluded). It was meant for a fun, low ammo cost, ar-style good time. Try a few different ammos out and see if you can tighten up the groups. If you still dont like the results let me know. Ill trade you a Mark II for your 15-22 today

 

[jollymon32]

What an education!
I have a Leupold Mark 4 scope mounted on the 15-22, cost just as much as the rifle! Before that I had a cheap $79 scope. I thought that the reason it was all over the place had something to do with the scope.

The Savage Arms has a cheap 4X Simmons scope...go figure...

I really thought that accuracy was a factor of optics and a steady hand. I really wanted the 15-22 to be a tack driver at 100 yards. Now I understand why I am so frustrated trying to hit the dueling tree at 100 yards... Sometimes I hit, sometimes it flies all above, below, and to the sides....

So, the 15-22 for plinking fun - and I guess I need to get a bolt action if I want to stay up to par with my son....

Question - I also have the M&P15 V-Tac rifle. Does this also apply to the 223 bigger brother? I seem to get better results with it - I have attributed it to a faster and more powerful load, i.e. less drop. But maybe the big brother is different.

Thanks for all the responses

The 'newbie'...

Andrew

 

[ChattanoogaPhil]

I guess I need to get a bolt action if I want to stay up to par with my son....

Move that Dueling Tree in from 100 to 50 yards and make the competition a timed event. Your 15-22 will be in it's element.

 

[jollymon32]

It was at 50 yards. His rifle was zeroed in at 50 and he soundly whooped my butt!

I, for challenge, shoot it at 100 yds. Or more like, try to shoot it at 100 yds.

I also noticed that sometimes I was unable to completely flip the paddle, I think the bullet had more fps coming out of the barrel of the savage versus the 15-22. Maybe because of the greater length.

Andrew

 

[reelman]

What an education!
I have a Leupold Mark 4 scope mounted on the 15-22, cost just as much as the rifle! Before that I had a cheap $79 scope. I thought that the reason it was all over the place had something to do with the scope.

The Savage Arms has a cheap 4X Simmons scope...go figure...

I really thought that accuracy was a factor of optics and a steady hand. I really wanted the 15-22 to be a tack driver at 100 yards. Now I understand why I am so frustrated trying to hit the dueling tree at 100 yards... Sometimes I hit, sometimes it flies all above, below, and to the sides....

So, the 15-22 for plinking fun - and I guess I need to get a bolt action if I want to stay up to par with my son....

Question - I also have the M&P15 V-Tac rifle. Does this also apply to the 223 bigger brother? I seem to get better results with it - I have attributed it to a faster and more powerful load, i.e. less drop. But maybe the big brother is different.

Thanks for all the responses

The 'newbie'...

Andrew

What Leupold Mark 4 did you buy for the price of a 15/22?

 

[jollymon32]

Mark 4 AR 4-12.

 

[ChattanoogaPhil]

I also noticed that sometimes I was unable to completely flip the paddle, I think the bullet had more fps coming out of the barrel of the savage versus the 15-22. Maybe because of the greater length.

Andrew

Without starting a debate on barrel length/velocity/velocity loss due to barrel friction after powder is spent/accuracy... on and on... I don't think that any velocity difference that might exist is an issue with flipping the paddles. Where the bullet strikes the paddle will make the most difference. If those paddles are about 2-2.5in you ought to be hitting them most every time from a supported position at 50 yards. Like Smith357 suggested, try some different ammo.

 

[jollymon32]

Man! I can't even blame FPS! I will have to live with realization that he is just that much better than me!

Wait, it's not him, it's the rifle! That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

 

[VooDuuChild]

I too was disappointed when I first realized how much more accurate my thirty to fifty year old bolt-action 22lr and the Browning autoloader are than my MOE.

But, it saves me a ton of money when I feel like shooting a black gun since 5.56mm's aren't getting any cheaper, the MOE fits the bill. Plus, it's all decked out now with fun goodies.

Although I never forget to bring the bolt-action 22lr with cheap ten year old bulk ammo I use for some more accurate plinking.

 

[reelman]

Mark 4 AR 4-12.

Just checking because Leupold does not sell any Mark 4 scopes in the $500 range, or even close to the that range. I was hoping that you didn't say a Mark 4 3.5-10X as if you bought one of those for $500 you most likely would have got one of the counterfeit ones and not a real Mark 4.

BTW your scope is a Mark AR, not a Mark 4. I have one of the Mark AR 3-9x scopes and like it a lot, your 4-12x is also a very nice scope.

 

[TrashmanNYC]

I too was disappointed when I first realized how much more accurate my thirty to fifty year old bolt-action 22lr and the Browning autoloader are than my MOE.

But, it saves me a ton of money when I feel like shooting a black gun since 5.56mm's aren't getting any cheaper, the MOE fits the bill. Plus, it's all decked out now with fun goodies.

Although I never forget to bring the bolt-action 22lr with cheap ten year old bulk ammo I use for some more accurate plinking.

What's MOE?

 

[Dixie fix]

does the barrel rifling have anything to do with this? seeing how its only 1- 15" twist. Wouldnt something that got more rotation on the bullet be more accurate like a 1-9"

 

[HalfSwiss]

In addition to ammo, the trigger can be a major factor on accuracy. Did you do any tuning of the 15-22 trigger?

Also, perhaps the major consideration in accuracy is who is behind the trigger. Perhaps you son is just a better shot??

 

[CPTBeaker]

What's MOE?

Magpul Original Equipment

It's a version of the 15-22 with Magpul stock, pistol grip, and backup front/rear sights.

 

[CPTBeaker]

If those paddles are about 2-2.5in you ought to be hitting them most every time from a supported position at 50 yards.

+1.

The accuracy of my 15-22 is very ammo dependent. With some ammo I'm lucky to get consistent 3" groups. With CCI Tactical, Winchester Super X (~1300 fps version), and Eley Purple box standard velocity I can get ~1.5 groups at 50yds (supported).

With the right ammo, this rifle is more accurate than I can shoot it. I'm the limiting factor.

I have a Ruger 10/22 that I upgraded with a bull barrel and did some trigger work. This particular gun is more accurate across a broader range of ammo than my 15-22, but it's not nearly as fun to shoot IMO. I'm not sure what the technical reason for the increased accuracy and why the ammo type is less critical in my 10/22 (it was just as accurate before I put the bull barrel on it - it just doesn't loose accuracy with a rapid succession of rounds). If I want to impress someone with my marksmanship, I'm going to use my 10/22.

The fun factor for me is with the 15-22.