Hello, all. I'm looking for advice on a nice .38 Special to collect - and shoot on occasion. I have a .38 S/N 3163xx that I'm told is pre-heat treated cylinder. From my understanding, the heat treat was more for wear than handling firing pressures. Looking for wisdom on that point. It's a fine shooter (148gr wadcutters) but the finish is well worn - although it has a handsome (to me) patina. It has a round butt, and I think I like the look of a square butt better. Any advice/opinion on a good years / S/N range on 1905 .38 Specials? I like the look of the mushroom ejector rod nut and the square butt.
1905 .38 Special
- Thread starter Clavin1
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Welcome to the forum. Any .38 M&P with a serial number between roughly 420000 and 580000 is likely to have hardened parts and a mushroom ejector rod knob. Basically you are looking for 1922-1928 production.
You'll get an argument about the purpose of heat treated steel. It definitely wears better because it is harder, but it is also a little stronger for metallurgical reasons that I don't really understand. My own suspicion is that the factory did it in the early '20s so they could get away from the process of putting those finicky little hardened shims in the cylinder notches to keep them from wearing loose too fast. Easier (and presumably cheaper) to harden the entire piece than to decorate it with little slivers.
You're in luck on the square butt, if that's what you want. In the 1920s most of them were made that way, with round butt guns far less common. Good luck in the hunt.
You'll get an argument about the purpose of heat treated steel. It definitely wears better because it is harder, but it is also a little stronger for metallurgical reasons that I don't really understand. My own suspicion is that the factory did it in the early '20s so they could get away from the process of putting those finicky little hardened shims in the cylinder notches to keep them from wearing loose too fast. Easier (and presumably cheaper) to harden the entire piece than to decorate it with little slivers.
You're in luck on the square butt, if that's what you want. In the 1920s most of them were made that way, with round butt guns far less common. Good luck in the hunt.
Post some pictures!
Try a 4th change MP target. They are square butt, adj sights but ejector rod is barrel shaped.They are really accurate and affordable. I shoot semi wadcutter in a couple of these. Mine number in the 65xxxx range. (late thirtys)
Pics (.jpg) too big. I'll .pdf and try again later. One thing I'm curious about with mine is there is no "MADE IS USA" or any makings at all on the right side. And there is no S&W logo or any other markings on the left side.
Late 'teens production. Around WWI the company wasn't marking their products the way we have come to expect based on guns of other eras.
If you use Photobucket you can avoid the file size issue; pics are resized on upload, and you are posting links rather than images.
For what its worth, its a Model of 1902, not 1905. 1905's have a square butt; that is
their unique characteristic. 1902's have a round butt.
Mike Priwer
their unique characteristic. 1902's have a round butt.
Mike Priwer
- Joined
- May 8, 2009
- Messages
- 926
- Reaction score
- 2,944
This One....
is an '05 model as well, 4th change, I think we decided.
wish I had kept it.
Ned
is an '05 model as well, 4th change, I think we decided.
wish I had kept it.
Ned
Take it up with the Catalogs
Both guns are 1902's. From their inception, until the factory dropped the 1902 & 1905
designation, somewhere between 1915 and 1918, the round butt was always the Model
of 1902, and the square butt was always the Model of 1905. The factory never referred
to a round butt K-frame as the Model of 1905. The defining characteristic of the Model
of 1905 is the square butt.
These next three pictures are from the 1913-1915 Three Pirates S&W Catalog, named
for the cover of the catalog. By 1919, the next catalog I have, the 1902 & 1905
designations have been changed, to simply Round Butt and Square Butt.
Mike Priwer
Both guns are 1902's. From their inception, until the factory dropped the 1902 & 1905
designation, somewhere between 1915 and 1918, the round butt was always the Model
of 1902, and the square butt was always the Model of 1905. The factory never referred
to a round butt K-frame as the Model of 1905. The defining characteristic of the Model
of 1905 is the square butt.
These next three pictures are from the 1913-1915 Three Pirates S&W Catalog, named
for the cover of the catalog. By 1919, the next catalog I have, the 1902 & 1905
designations have been changed, to simply Round Butt and Square Butt.
Mike Priwer
gaucho1
Member
That appears to be the definitive and possibly final word on the
02-05 issue.
Then again............this is THE S&W forum....so all bets are off..........
Where is Mr. Wilson?
Great catalog pages...Thank You
FYI..........I have and like both...but prefer the look of the round butt,
how about you?
02-05 issue.
Then again............this is THE S&W forum....so all bets are off..........
Where is Mr. Wilson?
Great catalog pages...Thank You
FYI..........I have and like both...but prefer the look of the round butt,
how about you?
This is one of those questions where you can argue it square or argue it round and you will never get everybody to agree. I completely understand Mike's point, but engineering changes need to be considered alongside the catalog entries. It remains the case that in addition to the different frame profile the model of 1905 incorporated a major design change that was not seen in the 1902 first change -- the cylinder stop was modified, resulting in the new screw in front of the trigger guard to retain the different spring and plunger system. If we preserve the 1902 designation for RB guns, that feature means the new SB 1905 is mechanically equivalent to a hypothetical RB 1902/second change. From then on, preserving the 1902/1905 distinction based on grip profile means every new variety of the M&P results in a gun with a change designation that is a count of two higher for a 1902 than for a 1905. Add in the fact that the 1905/first and 1905/second distinction is not as crisp as most collectors would like (tens of thousands of guns were produced in a long serial number range with inconsistent features, like the presence or absence of locating pins on the rear face of the cylinder), and you are heading for a classification system that pretends to be more systematic and rigid than in fact it can be.
We can look at the catalog distinctions and come up with one classification system, or we can ignore catalog names and look at a sequence of engineering changes that will suggest a second classification system. If ownership had been more aggressive about forging alignment between the engineering and marketing divisions over a century ago, we would not be having this discussion today. (Hmm, that sounds like a familiar problem in modern industrial production.
)
We have a serviceable though not completely precise classification system that was codified by Neal and Jinks nearly 50 years ago. This system considers RB M&Ps manufactured after 1905 to be variants of the 1905 regardless of how they may have been advertised. I am willing to continue using this system despite its inconsistency with the early catalogs simply because it is now so well established in the collecting world. Most people who are more than superficially involved in M&P collecting know about the gray zones anyway. Whether they write about them this way or not, I imagine many think about the later RB guns with asterisks after the model designation, or with short following explanatory notations in parentheses.
We can look at the catalog distinctions and come up with one classification system, or we can ignore catalog names and look at a sequence of engineering changes that will suggest a second classification system. If ownership had been more aggressive about forging alignment between the engineering and marketing divisions over a century ago, we would not be having this discussion today. (Hmm, that sounds like a familiar problem in modern industrial production.
)We have a serviceable though not completely precise classification system that was codified by Neal and Jinks nearly 50 years ago. This system considers RB M&Ps manufactured after 1905 to be variants of the 1905 regardless of how they may have been advertised. I am willing to continue using this system despite its inconsistency with the early catalogs simply because it is now so well established in the collecting world. Most people who are more than superficially involved in M&P collecting know about the gray zones anyway. Whether they write about them this way or not, I imagine many think about the later RB guns with asterisks after the model designation, or with short following explanatory notations in parentheses.
Gaucho1
Personally I prefer the round-butt frame. Beyond my preferences, it is the butt style
that has survived ; square butts are no longer made, and have not been made for
several years now.
Regards, Mike Priwer
Personally I prefer the round-butt frame. Beyond my preferences, it is the butt style
that has survived ; square butts are no longer made, and have not been made for
several years now.
Regards, Mike Priwer
I like David's explanation. The problem is that if we strictly use the catalogs for identification, by the 1920s the "1902" and "1905" was totally dropped so we would have to change the name of the later production revolver??. I looked through my Catalog D-3 and 1925 catalog and the name for the round and square butt revolvers were simply Military & Police. I wonder in what issue catalog the year designation was dropped?
Last edited:
David
Anecdotally, your saying that while you have a daughter named Suzie, you call her
Barbara because she looks so much like a person named Barbara. That doesn't make
her name Barbara - its still Suzie.
What you say is true: collectors generally refer to all post-1905 K-frames as Models
of 1905, regardless of butt configuration. They do this because of the inconsistency
that arise from their (not the factories) naming convention. As an aside, Roy Jinks
occasionally letters a round-butt gun as a "late 1902" .
The collectors were/are looking for a scheme to classify these guns by their engineering
changes - principally before the factories introduction of model numbers with dashes
to signifiy the changes. Prior to the late 1950's, that kind of classification only
existed internally within the factory, and it was done for the purpose of aiding the
service department in replacing parts on guns sent in for repairs.
The inconsistecy, as you aluded to, arises because the Model of 1905 was introduced
in late 1904, before the introduction of the new cylinder stop, and before the
introduction of the redesigned trigger rebound system. This made for two identical
guns - the later Model of 1902 (with the heavier frame and barrel shoulder, called the
1902 1st change by S&WCA ), and the Model of 1905. Both guns were identical,
except for the butt configuration.
The original collectors were not comfortable with this dual-designation for the same
gun - sans the butt configuration. The square butt was always a different model,
and not an engineering change - at least to the outside world. What were the collectors
to do?
For their purposes ( and not that of the factory, or the buyers of these guns ) they
opted to delay the recognition of the Model of 1905. Early square butts, before the
introduction of the 5th frame screw, were referred to as pre-1905's in the factory
letters. The collectors formally recognized the Model of 1905 when the 5th frame
screw was introduced. This, of course, is not "right" - the Model of 1905 was in
production, and being sold, months before the introduction of the 5th frame screw.
When the 5th frame screw was introduced, it was implemented on both round and
square butt models at the same time. From an engineering-change orientation, this
is when the problem developes. It is really the second major engineering change for
the round-butt Model of 1902, but the first engineering change applied to the
square butt Model of 1905, introduced several months earlier.
This is what the collectors did not want to deal with : two otherwise identical guns,
but with different engineering-change designations. Their solution was to change the
designation of the Model 1902, thus losing the notion and concept of a round-butt
model. The factory, of course, in making and selling these guns, did not do this, and
continued to have separate model identifications for at least another 60 years , or
more - well after WW2 .
The real issue here, to me, is that the distinction between round butt and square butt
is that they are two different models. They are identical in all other respects, as the
1913 - 1915 catalog so clearly says, but in their eyes, they are two different models.
This, I think, is the major error that the collectors make. They are unable to recognize
different models of the other-wise same gun; the factory was very clear in this regard.
As I said earlier, you can call your daughter Barbara, but her name is Suzie.
Regards, Mike
Anecdotally, your saying that while you have a daughter named Suzie, you call her
Barbara because she looks so much like a person named Barbara. That doesn't make
her name Barbara - its still Suzie.
What you say is true: collectors generally refer to all post-1905 K-frames as Models
of 1905, regardless of butt configuration. They do this because of the inconsistency
that arise from their (not the factories) naming convention. As an aside, Roy Jinks
occasionally letters a round-butt gun as a "late 1902" .
The collectors were/are looking for a scheme to classify these guns by their engineering
changes - principally before the factories introduction of model numbers with dashes
to signifiy the changes. Prior to the late 1950's, that kind of classification only
existed internally within the factory, and it was done for the purpose of aiding the
service department in replacing parts on guns sent in for repairs.
The inconsistecy, as you aluded to, arises because the Model of 1905 was introduced
in late 1904, before the introduction of the new cylinder stop, and before the
introduction of the redesigned trigger rebound system. This made for two identical
guns - the later Model of 1902 (with the heavier frame and barrel shoulder, called the
1902 1st change by S&WCA ), and the Model of 1905. Both guns were identical,
except for the butt configuration.
The original collectors were not comfortable with this dual-designation for the same
gun - sans the butt configuration. The square butt was always a different model,
and not an engineering change - at least to the outside world. What were the collectors
to do?
For their purposes ( and not that of the factory, or the buyers of these guns ) they
opted to delay the recognition of the Model of 1905. Early square butts, before the
introduction of the 5th frame screw, were referred to as pre-1905's in the factory
letters. The collectors formally recognized the Model of 1905 when the 5th frame
screw was introduced. This, of course, is not "right" - the Model of 1905 was in
production, and being sold, months before the introduction of the 5th frame screw.
When the 5th frame screw was introduced, it was implemented on both round and
square butt models at the same time. From an engineering-change orientation, this
is when the problem developes. It is really the second major engineering change for
the round-butt Model of 1902, but the first engineering change applied to the
square butt Model of 1905, introduced several months earlier.
This is what the collectors did not want to deal with : two otherwise identical guns,
but with different engineering-change designations. Their solution was to change the
designation of the Model 1902, thus losing the notion and concept of a round-butt
model. The factory, of course, in making and selling these guns, did not do this, and
continued to have separate model identifications for at least another 60 years , or
more - well after WW2 .
The real issue here, to me, is that the distinction between round butt and square butt
is that they are two different models. They are identical in all other respects, as the
1913 - 1915 catalog so clearly says, but in their eyes, they are two different models.
This, I think, is the major error that the collectors make. They are unable to recognize
different models of the other-wise same gun; the factory was very clear in this regard.
As I said earlier, you can call your daughter Barbara, but her name is Suzie.
Regards, Mike
Glowe
Not quite accurate. The two pages below are from the D-3 catalog. The full name, as
shown on these pages, is "Military and Police Round Butt", and "Military and Police Square
Butt" . The factory is differentiating between the two models. As late as 1915, they
were still using Model of 1902 and Model of 1905. By the 1902's, perhaps they
wanted to be a bit more up-to-date, so they changed the nomenclature. What they
did not change, was the notion that they are two different models.
If one looks closely, they will see that there are siginificant differences between the two models.
Check out the overall lengths of the guns, and their weights. They are different. Also, the round
butt model is no longer being offered with adjustable sights.
Two different models.
Regards, Mike Priwer
Last edited:
