Rifle in Newtown shooter's trunk not a Bushmaster

Register to hide this ad
Too late. The Bushmaster company is already for sale and the country believes it was an AR. They don't even need a credible story line to take the next step once the Demons of Stupidity are on task.
 
Do you all recall the doctor saying in public that the victims were shot with 223? and now they say its only pistols? I have a feeling there is a storm coming.

I do!

I can see how people could have gotten the guns confused but how can a medical examiner botch something like this especially when he was presented with the facts (that we didnt know at the time) such as --- there were only handguns found in the school.

I normally dont wear tin foil hats but this case makes me wanna run out and buy one

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
I do!

I can see how people could have gotten the guns confused but how can a medical examiner botch something like this especially when he was presented with the facts (that we didnt know at the time) such as --- there were only handguns found in the school.

I normally dont wear tin foil hats but this case makes me wanna run out and buy one
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Ya i am not normally either wearing the tin foil hats but this really makes you think long and hard. Its scary and sad. They do say history does repeat it self......Storm is coming.
 
If Lanza had used the Glock and Sig to kill his victims, would we be hearing about an "assault weapon" ban? Something fishy here. Remember the old "weapons of mass destruction" allegation told as gospel that turned out to be a big lie? Never trust what your government tells you. I bet a good investigative reporter -- a dying species -- could find out what weapons were actually used. It would take some digging but if it turned out the AR wasn't used, it's a major story that sharply changes the gun control discussion.
 
Last edited:
I have been waiting for a month to hear a factual statement on what gun was used. There were so many conflicting statements out after the incident that I for one am certainly not clear at all on what was used.. If a rifle was used, how did it get in the trunk? The video I saw of police removing a rifle from the trunk and clearing it was "definitely" not an AR style rifle... The action was operated from the side instead of rearward.

I don't like this lack of clear facts at all - and dislike the fact that the media and everyone else isn't trying to dig into the true facts almost as much. Something really stinks on this...
 
Im reading on other boards that the second video in the OPs link, the one that talks about 4 handguns, is actually an older video made prior to the coroners statement.

Why is it so hard to just come out and say what happened and what was used? But even if they did that, at this point who would believe them anyway?!?!

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
I watched the video and to me it looked more like a Remington 11-87 or Benelli than a Saiga.
 
looked like a mini 14 to me also.

<sarcasm on> but seriously.....you don't really think the media would purposely report incorrect information ??? I mean they are such a positive and truthfull class of human correct?

<sarcasm off>
 
War is always sold to it’s people by artificially demonizing the enemy. In this case the enemy is a semi-automatic sporting rifle AKA Assault Rifle.

Countries need to lie about their enemies in order to demonize them sufficiently so that the people will support the war.
 
I am more than willing to believe that the facts were distorted to make a better case for gun control by the media, but WHY would the police give out misinformation? How many patrolmen, medics, survivors, would ALL have to get together and agree to convicingly lie about this? And the "Mossad agents slaughtered kids" theory is utter ****. And yes, that rifle being unloaded in the car is NOT an AR.
 
Back
Top