I hate to be rude but it seems idiotic to me that someone would
knowingly choose a specially designed semi auto cartridge to
shoot in a revolver. the ACP part of the name is there for a reason.
Why not do it in 45 LC so the cartridge has a proper rim which
is more or less designed for revolvers or vice versa.
If you were to say you had a dozen 1911 pistols and thousands
of empty shell casings and you reload etc etc and it makes sense
to stick with 45 ACP then maybe I could understand.
Who the heck needs to deal with moon clips ? ! !
Personally, having moonclips being a semi-requirement is a turn off for me on revos too. I really think one of the revo's inherent mechanical advantage over semis is not needing extra things such as clips or magazines to fully utilize the gun.
That said.. the 45ACP revolver with moonclips is pretty much the standard to beat for reloads. The short, stout rounds are easier to get in vs the spindly 357mags.
I used to think the same as you about the 625, but lately as I'm realizing how beneficial it can be to reload just 1 caliber due to my personal equipment and space constraints.. I'm getting more attracted to the idea of getting a 625. I mentioned in another thread that I was contemplating reorganizing my primary centerfire handguns:
SW 627, SW 29, and Glock 17
to
SW 625, 1911, and Glock 30
I'd much rather just reload and stockpile a ton of 1 caliber vs separating them amongst different calibers, especially since I'm just doing single stage press.
For now, Rimz seems to be a great alternative for just range play. I do wish S&W found a way to just hold 45 ACP without moonclips though.