Win 9mm NATO 124gr. from WalMart

9mm NATO M882

The following information should resolve all questions regarding the 9mm NATO M882 round.

The 9mm NATO (M882) velocity acceptance specs are based on a longer barrel (SMG) of 7.848" (20 cm). See the following:

MIL-C-70508 (9mm NATO ammunition specification, 7 Feb 1985) (NOTE: you can Google and find it free as a PDF file - It is there)
Velocity = 1263+/-49 fps average @ 52.5' from muzzle. Chamber Pressure = 34,519 psi max. average (7.848" (20 cm) test barrel) Test temperature is 21 deg. C +/- 2 deg. C. There are also pressure and velocity test requirements at higher and lower temperatures. Average velocity and pressure are based upon 30 shots fired from a test barrel at each of three temperatures.

Winchester Lot Acceptance Test (LAT) Data: Velocity average over the last 5 lots = 1249 fps min. Chamber pressure 32,783 psi average max. (Note: The NATO chamber pressure procedure requires measurement at the cartridge case mouth using a piezoelectric test gauge. Results are not necessarily comparable to chamber pressure measurements obtained using other methods)

Having personally chronographed the "genuine" military 124 grain M882 from a 5" barrel Beretta M9, I found the average muzzle velocity to be about 1175 FPS. Winchester states it to be 1149 fps, but I don't know their test details. It could be slightly greater or less than this depending upon temperature, barrel length, barrel dimensions, and the specific ammo lot. It's probably safe to assume the true velocity of the M882 as being between 1150 and 1200 FPS in a 5" barrel.

At the time I was involved in this sort of thing over five years ago, Winchester was the sole contract manufacturer of the M882 round for the US military. I do not know if they still are. I saw the M882 loading line at Winchester's East Alton IL plant once, and was told that Winchester's civilian 124 grain FMJ 9mm ammunition was exactly the same. The only differences (other than the headstamp) were in the level of quality control and the packaging. Regarding weapon suitability, any pistol equivalent to the Beretta M9 (aka Model 92) should be able to survive on a steady diet of M882 ammo. We had M9s that had been fired in excess of 100K rounds in training with no repairs needed. Once, we magnafluxed a sample of high-mileage M9s, and found no slide, barrel, or frame cracking. In the early days of the M9 (late 1980s), there were several problems with both barrel and slide failures, which were later resolved. The M9 is indeed a tough gun.

I have also seen references to a 115 grain 9mm NATO load, but am unaware of any in recent US service. Maybe some other NATO countries use a 9mm load with a 115 grain bullet. I don't know.

Much M9 and M11 (SIG) training in the US Air Force is currently done with lead-free frangible ammunition, also manufactured by Winchester. This is designated Cartridge, 9mm Frangible, Mark 254 Mod 0, NSN: 1305014428717, DODIC AA16. This cartridge uses a 90 grain Sinterfire sintered copper bullet. This round can be used in the M9 and M11 pistols and also the MP5 SMG, but does not work well in the UZI.

Several years ago, the US Air Force started a program moving toward obtaining a new service pistol to replace the M9, and was considering, among other calibers (such as .45 ACP and .40 S&W), the 9X23mm Winchester at a MV of about 1430 FPS using the same 124grain FMJ bullet as the M882. That pistol program was terminated in 2007. There was a small quantity of this ammunition loaded by Winchester for preliminary evaluation, and I fired most of it. It was a winner in power and accuracy, but was a little stout in recoil compared to the M882.
 
Last edited:
124 gr. NATO

I've been searching for over an hour trying to get an answer, everything I read is different, NATO is = to +P, NATO is HOTTER than +P+, NATO is 40k psi, NATO is 36k psi.
Can someone give me a straight answer?

This round is STANDARD MIL-SPEC pressure to be used in ANY standard weapon. NOT +P or +P+. The case is slightly thicker per Military reqirements. The original Browning was spec.'d for 124grs. NOT 115 or 147. This is the load that I carry in my old, non+P 1974 P35 since 124gr. HP's are hard to find. Ok, one shot stops w/FMJ is/are less than ideal. How 'bout 3 or 4 or 5 shots stops? P.S. My Glocks (2) get the Winchester Ranger 127gr. +P+ LEO only load. My .45's (3) get any HP available.
 
Last edited:
Throwing in the Monkeywrench?

I have two cases of military surplus 9mm. Headstamp F C 1998 with the circled cross. I have shot up most of the third case, purchased from Sportsman's Guide and Natchez Shooters Supply around the turn of the last century. I do not feel any difference shooting them in my G17, 19 and 26, as compared to standard pressure premium self defense ammo. And the Remington Golden Saber 9mm+P 124s are not producing more felt recoil for me either.
Also a quick scan of my hand loading manuals does not show any recipes mark as +P? In 38SPL yes but not 9mm Parabellum/Luger/x19 and etc.
 
Last edited:
This round is STANDARD MIL-SPEC pressure to be used in ANY standard weapon. NOT +P or +P+.

I would sure put the Winchester NATO Q4318 performance in the +P category, based on the actual velocities I posted back on page one of this thread, regardless of what the pressures are.
 
That SAAMI "do not use in.." list is interesting. At least the 9mm NATO in a 9mm Luger is understandable. Some of the others, such as "do not use .308 Winchester in a .25-06 Remington" make you scratch your head.

I guess I have to stop fireforming 38-55 and 375 Winchester cases from factory 30-30 rounds in my Marlin 38-55.

Noah
 
I have two cases of military surplus 9mm. Headstamp F C 1998 with the circled cross. I have shot up most of the third case, purchased from Sportsman's Guide and Natchez Shooters Supply around the turn of the last century. I do not feel any difference shooting them in my G17, 19 and 26, as compared to standard pressure premium self defense ammo. And the Remington Golden Saber 9mm+P 124s are not producing more felt recoil for me either.
Also a quick scan of my hand loading manuals does not show any recipes mark as +P? In 38SPL yes but not 9mm Parabellum/Luger/x19 and etc.

I have about 2 1/2 cases of this Federal NATO contract overrun ammo, myself, purchased about the same time. While it's been too long since I chronoed it for me to recall specific velocities, I know I was getting well over 1200 fps. from a Glock 17, and I seem to remember it being in the 1250 fps. range. I'll have to pull some out and shoot it over the screens. It is definitely hotter than a lot of +P, velocity-wise, but not especially impressive, in terms of recoil. I've not chronoed it from a Beretta 92, but I have one, so I will. Good, clean, accurate ammo.
 
This round is STANDARD MIL-SPEC pressure to be used in ANY standard weapon. NOT +P or +P+. The case is slightly thicker per Military reqirements. The original Browning was spec.'d for 124grs. NOT 115 or 147. This is the load that I carry in my old, non+P 1974 P35 since 124gr. HP's are hard to find. Ok, one shot stops w/FMJ is/are less than ideal. How 'bout 3 or 4 or 5 shots stops? P.S. My Glocks (2) get the Winchester Ranger 127gr. +P+ LEO only load. My .45's (3) get any HP available.


Remington Golden Sabre 124 grain non plus P
Cheaper than dirt has it for 15-16 dollars a box currently.
 
WOW, bringing back an old thread here but, ...

I picked up some of this at a price I couldn't pass up. I read this whole thread and my head hurts :)

Is this safe in my M&P 9 pro 5"???? I think this thread said yes!!!!
 

Attachments

  • 9mm NATO.jpg
    9mm NATO.jpg
    176.4 KB · Views: 85
Last edited:
the 124gr NATO round should be between a standard and a +P loading.
From all the data I have read it should be around 36,500psi maximum and around 1185 fps, with a oal of 1.165".

A lot depends on the case, powder and bullet seating, so there can be lots of variation in the fps that a round puts out.

1150 fps is a standard 9mm, 1090fps a target loading and a load of 1200fps or more is in the +P range with a 124gr FMJ, however pressures will vary with fast or slower powders used.

The 9mm can be "Dialed in" with powders and the oal of the round. One good reason to never "Guess" at what ammo you have.
Good shooting.
 
We use and have used tens of thousands of rounds of this stuff in our M&P 9mms at our academy. The only caveat is that S&W wants you to change out recoil springs at 5000rd, which we do anyhow.
 
WOW, bringing back an old thread here but, ...

I picked up some of this at a price I couldn't pass up. I read this whole thread and my head hurts :)

Is this safe in my M&P 9 pro 5"???? I think this thread said yes!!!!

How much was it? I just found by chance today at the WM I go to the most, about 15 boxes 1oo rounds winchester 9mm--the first ive seen since around November. By the way--prices on these rose slightly over $2 bucks. I wanted to get 3, but couldnt justify it. Anyway, with tax, it was $28 and change. Was $26 and change.
 
Ya, Federal 100's have gone up 3 ties the past 4 months to about $1.50 less than WWB.

My wife has been taking me estate sale shopping on 1/2 off last day. I won't tell you what I paid so you won't cry but it ended up feeling like I'm Gonna Party Like It's 1999!!!

How much was it? I just found by chance today at the WM I go to the most, about 15 boxes 1oo rounds winchester 9mm--the first ive seen since around November. By the way--prices on these rose slightly over $2 bucks. I wanted to get 3, but couldnt justify it. Anyway, with tax, it was $28 and change. Was $26 and change.
 
Ya, Federal 100's have gone up 3 ties the past 4 months to about $1.50 less than WWB.

My wife has been taking me estate sale shopping on 1/2 off last day. I won't tell you what I paid so you won't cry but it ended up feeling like I'm Gonna Party Like It's 1999!!!

No crying--just a little tear action will do.
crock_cruel.jpg

Are you sure your name aint Commandant Crock? :D
 

Latest posts

Back
Top