Ivory

poordevil

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
801
Reaction score
436
Location
Yuma
Does anyone know the latest status on interstate Ivory pistol grips. Has the proposed bill fell through?


P
 
Register to hide this ad
All I heard was that Obama had proposed an Executive Order banning sales. No details were forthcoming on what would be affected. Jewelry? Antique art carvings? Pianos? There was uproar from several quarters as this would gore many sacred cows (see previous sentence). Nothing more has been heard (by me). May have been posturing to appease radical groups with no intention to follow through.
 
Mammoth ivory doesn't really resemble elephant ivory all that closely. At least none that I have seen. I wouldn't worry about it 'til the authorities start carrying carbon dating kits around with them. ;)
f.t.

p.s. Heck,I'm just not going to worry about it at all. :cool:
 
This is what I have heard, and I will try to word this carefully to avoid politics:

1. There is over $100,000,000 in Asia art just in California that would have been seized as being illegal because there is no Federally required documentation. These people are mad, and they have money to file lawsuits against the Federal Government.

2. In June when the Budapest String Orchestra for a series of State Department sponsered performances, US Customs seized some of their instruments and charged some of the musicians as ivory smugglers. After the State Department intervened, the instruments were returned, and the State Department paid the fines.

3. Washington is giving certain exemptions to musicians providing that they do not join with the NRA in any lawsuits.

4. The proposed ivory ban was initially an idea to stick it to some gun owners who were viewed in Washington as wannabe George Pattons. What the pea-brains in Washington didn't realize was that their ivory ban would affect a lot more than ivory handled guns. It would affect the Steinway piano in the White House, the Liberace Museum, the Metropolitan Opera in NYC, the art community (collectors and dealers), and many others, besides gun owners with ivory handled guns.

5. The art dealers, collectors, and museum patrons combined have billions at their disposal and are willing to join with the NRA to file lawsuits to tie up this proposed ban for years.

I collect historical Western art, and although I don't collect Asian art or contemporary art that contains ivory (such as Erte), I do talk with those who do, and they are beyond furious. They are questioning the sanity of certain pea-brains in Washington. Their attitude is "Screw the Feds. Nobody is taking their art and investments away."

Of course, I don't own any ivory handled guns. I was using them as ballast in my canoe in a canoe race across Lake Tahoe last month. The canoe overturned, and I lost everything. What? You don't believe me? Well, just dive down to the bottom of Lake Tahoe and see my guns for yourself. They're there. Trust me.
 
Of course, I don't own any ivory handled guns. I was using them as ballast in my canoe in a canoe race across Lake Tahoe last month. The canoe overturned, and I lost everything. What? You don't believe me? Well, just dive down to the bottom of Lake Tahoe and see my guns for yourself. They're there. Trust me.
I know some deepwater divers.
Can you give me those GPS coordinates, please? :D
 
Another clarification needed. There was no Bill or law. There wasn't even an Executive Order. It was the loose cannons in Fish and Wildlife that just decided they needed to "do something". So the enacted their very own ban. It simply makes sales and transfers, along with interstate movement of ivory object unless they have some arcane documentation. It must be older than a few arbitrary dates, depending on what it purports to be. If its Asian, it goes by one age and if its African, another. Basically what you need is indisputable proof of its age and documents proving when it was imported.

No one has that kind of documentation. When you buy a gun with handles on it, it never comes with customs documents. Same deal for your Steinway. They made the ban broad enough that their greenie liberal friends were happy. And its got a loophole you could drive a white ivory truck through. You're allowed to own your treasures. But if you move from cold and ugly New York, your piano stays there. And you can't give it or sell it to anyone.

Yes, there is a term for this. Its what comes out of the south end of a north bound male bovine. Who knows if the next president (no caps) will force them to rescind their little game. No chance of the bill denying funding passing. The Senate is held hostage.
 
I may or may not have bought an ivory guitar nut (string alignment piece at the top of the neck) and bridge pins (retain the strings at the bridge) a number of years ago for my favorite accoustic.

Total weight is way less than an ounce. I believe I could currently do more jail time than someone smuggling in a pound of heroin.
 
Although the proposal was deeply flawed, I believe something needs to be done to prevent the poaching currently ongoing.

As the fiasco on drugs has shown, something would have to be done to curtail demand to be successful. Much of the problem is currently with China, and I can't think of a way the USA could affect that.
 
Although the proposal was deeply flawed, I believe something needs to be done to prevent the poaching currently ongoing. QUOTE]

How about putting a bounty on poachers? Shoot them , hang their carcass from a tree, and the US can pay a few hundred dollars per dead poacher. In those countries, a few hundred dollars is big money.
 
Importing new ivory already banned. No law stops criminals and anyone on a gun forum should know that.

Like I said in Post #2, there were no details about what would be affected. Fossil ivory? Art? Jewelry? Musical instruments? Nobody could say. It was a giant cluster fluff and was met with resistance from all sides except the radical animal rights people. I would not be surprised if never surfaces again.
 
Here is the latest.

October Events Important for Ivory Ban

Efforts continue in October to oppose the ivory ban. The Advisory Council on Wildlife Trafficking has called another public meeting where we can continue to voice objections, and the Elephant Protection Association is reaching out to new groups, businesses and ivory owners to get them engaged in the battle to protect elephants without hurting innocent Americans.

Advisory Council Public Meeting on October 17
in Washington, D.C.
Northeast Japanese Swords & Cultural Arts Show
The Advisory Council for Wildlife Trafficking has announced another public hearing for Friday, October 17 in Washington, D.C. The meeting notice says the Council intends to "devote a significant portion of the meeting" on species besides elephants and rhinos. The notice did not say it is restricting comments about ivory. If you would like to attend the meeting in person to make a comment, you must notify the Council in writing by October 3. You can reserve a seat and an opportunity to speak through our website by clicking here:

Make Reservation

If you want to submit written comments to the Council, you need to submit them electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at Regulations.gov by 11:59 PM Eastern on October 10, 2014. Go to Regulations.gov, then search FWS-HQ-IA-2014-0019 in the Search box, then click "Comment Now." Faxes and e-mails will not be accepted. To submit comments by mail, see Click Here for instructions.
The Elephant Protection Association will be at the Northeast Japanese Swords & Cultural Arts Show in Philadelphia from October 17-19. The show melds ancient Samurai swords with more modern Japanese cultural arts.
 
"Not affected. Nobody is poaching them.
f.t. "

How do you prove that it's that old?
The earrings I got my wife when I was up in AK had no box or paper work other then what the store told me about them..... :(

Schreger Lines.
 

Attachments

  • schreger.jpg
    schreger.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 28

Latest posts

Back
Top