J-frame or LCP, or both?

Gunnslinger

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I've become fond of carrying my M&P 340 in the winter months. I do have a belt holster, but I typically keep it in my jacket pocket. I also have an LCP, which is just as easy (or easier) to carry. The snub is better as far as power goes, but the LCP isn't far behind, plus it holds more rounds and can reload faster.

If given the choice between the two, which would you choose?
 
Register to hide this ad
All other considerations aside (I own both J Frames and an LCP), which one do you shoot the best? You will likely do your very best work with that one! Not to say that you cannot do good work with either one, but I believe this is a very important consideration. Which one can you get in your hand, with your preferred method of carry, and draw and fire with easiest?

Regardless of which is better ballistically, being able to get the gun into action quickly, smoothly, and with a proper grip that will allow you to do your best work without fumbling, is a prime consideration for personal protection business. We are all different, so what works for each of us is a very personal choice. I would say that you need to do some dry practice with each one to find out what is best for you. I think you will likely discover this pretty quickly. I carry both, but generally under different circumstances, and sometimes both together in different places on my person. My only real caution is that either one needs to be in a dedicated holster inside your pocket for safety reasons as well as to make sure your gun stays upright. Neither is easy to draw if it is sideways or upside down in your pocket!!!!
 
You can shoot the 340 out of said pocket with effectively no malfunction, the lcp...... plus get a pocket holster.
 
I carried a J frame for well over 40 years until 2014 when I picked up the no laser M&P .380 and liked the ease of carry, accuracy and reliability. This past summer the LCP went on sale at Gander Mountain for $199 so I got one. It's smaller and lighter than the S&W, plus w/the factory extended mag, holds a total of 8 rounds. In old age (I'm 70) light and small have become important. I shoot the LCP monthly and have found it to be utterly reliable and accurate as my EDC.
 
All other considerations aside (I own both J Frames and an LCP), which one do you shoot the best? You will likely do your very best work with that one! Not to say that you cannot do good work with either one, but I believe this is a very important consideration. Which one can you get in your hand, with your preferred method of carry, and draw and fire with easiest?

Regardless of which is better ballistically, being able to get the gun into action quickly, smoothly, and with a proper grip that will allow you to do your best work without fumbling, is a prime consideration for personal protection business. We are all different, so what works for each of us is a very personal choice. I would say that you need to do some dry practice with each one to find out what is best for you. I think you will likely discover this pretty quickly. I carry both, but generally under different circumstances, and sometimes both together in different places on my person. My only real caution is that either one needs to be in a dedicated holster inside your pocket for safety reasons as well as to make sure your gun stays upright. Neither is easy to draw if it is sideways or upside down in your pocket!!!!

If I'm being honest with myself, I'm probably a little better shooting semis, so the .380 wins there. I also have a LC9s, which is very similar, just bigger. I do like wheel guns, though. I'm a big fan of both the LCP and my snub:D
 
I love j frames, but I find the LCP hides so much better with pocket carry. The j frame leaves a bulge, whereas the LCP is pretty much invisible.
 
This is one of those personal preference topics.

If I were choosing for myself, I would prefer to have both a J-frame and a LCP. I carry IWB probably 99.99999% of the time, and for that I carry a J-frame. I've attempted pocket carrying my 642 a few times, but it always feels awkward to me. However, it would be nice to have a slim pocket gun like the LCP for situations requiring even more discreet carry than my typical J-frame/IWB combo would allow.

Again, just my opinion, but hopefully it'll give you something to consider.
 
I love shooting revolvers and a J frame was my EDC for years. I carry inside waist band in a Kydex holster. Lately I find myself choosing my LCP. I feel guilty and go back to my J with a similar setup on occasion but darn it the LCP is winning.
 
I Like the j frame, if only for the ability to fire from the pocket. Advice to take what you shoot best, and use a good holster sounds spot on.
 
For me, revolvers have the cool factor. When the chips are down, more rounds wins. I'd carry the Ruger out of those choices.
 
I love j frames, but I find the LCP hides so much better with pocket carry. The j frame leaves a bulge, whereas the LCP is pretty much invisible.

I wear a leather bomber jacket and carry the J in the inside chest pocket, so no bulge, but I do feel the weight a bit. Not as bad a trying to pocket carry a Glock 26 or something, though, lol.
 
442 is my present winter pocket gun. It feels right and the 38SPL has just a bit more oomph for penetrating winter clothing, which is often 4-6 inches in my area.

I did carry a KT P3AT in the winter jacket pocket for about eight years. The 442 stays in place better and offers a better grip as well in the pocket. The 442 also interfaces better with gloves. That is my choice, but YMMV.
 
My choice would be the snub hands down. More reliable, more effective round and ECQ advantages as well. I understand the lure of the tiny auto, but I know I wouldn't feel too confident with a micro .380 if I was forced into stopping a determined attacker(s). The hammerless revolver, despite it's limited capacity, retains certain functional and tactical advantages in any scenario, but the same really cannot be said of the micro auto pistol since it's only truly positive attribute is ease of carry.

"The leading wound ballistic researcher in the world, Dr. Gary Roberts, recently weighed in on the issue in a wound ballistics briefing for the FBI. Here is his advice:

"Many small, easily concealed semi-automatic pistols which are recommended for law enforcement backup or concealed carry use fire .380 ACP or smaller bullets. While these small caliber handgun bullets can produce fatal wounds, they are less likely to produce the rapid incapacitation necessary in law enforcement or self-defense situations.

Handguns chambered in .380 ACP are small, compact, and generally easy to carry. Unfortunately, testing has shown that they offer inadequate performance for self-defense and for law enforcement use whether on duty as a back-up weapon or for off duty carry. The terminal performance of .380 ACP JHP's is often erratic, with inadequate penetration and inconsistent expansion being common problems, while .380 ACP FMJ's offer adequate penetration, but no expansion. All of the .380 ACP JHP loads we have tested, including CorBon, Hornady, Federal, Remington, Speer, and Winchester exhibited inconsistent, unacceptable terminal performance for law enforcement back-up and off duty self-defense use due to inadequate penetration or inadequate expansion. Stick with FMJ for .380 ACP or better yet, don't use it at all. The use of .380 ACP and smaller caliber weapons is really not acceptable for law enforcement use and most savvy agencies prohibit them. While both the .380 ACP and .38 spl can obviously be lethal; the .38 spl is more likely to incapacitate an attacker when used in a BUG role.

BUG–Infrequently used, but when needed, it must be 100% reliable because of the extreme emergency situation the user is dealing with. Generally secreted in pockets, ankle holsters, body armor holsters, etc… Often covered in lint, grime, and gunk. By their very nature, usually applied to the opponent in an up close and personal encounter, many times involving contact shots. A small .38 spl revolver is more reliable in these situations than a small .380 ACP pistol, especially with contact shots or if fired from a pocket."
 
I have both. I don't carry the LCP anymore. I have a couple of J frames one of which is the M&P 340. I can carry the 340 in any situation where I used to carry the LCP. Three less rounds but I feel more comfortable with the revolver as far as reliability and my ability to shoot it accurately with confidence. I'm fine with carrying a .380 for self defense but between these two choices I choose the J frame.
 
Thanks for the input, guys. Speaking of the snub, do you normally carry any extra ammo, and if so, in a speed strip or speed loader? I can use a speed strip, although it's anything but speedy, haha. I would say I can reload reasonably quickly with the loader. As far as ammo, I've been carrying the Gold Dot 135gr +P short barrel in my revolver, and the Gold Dot 90gr in the LCP.
 
I have 3 guns in my carry menu, an LCP, a Smith 36 and a Glock 27.
The LCP is basically my main carry piece because it's so easy! ;)
 
Back
Top