New M&P shield barell looks worn

Xynty

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2017
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Purchased a 9mm shield at academy, didn't really look at the barrel at the time of purchase ... the next day I was cleaning the gun (did not shoot it) and noticed it was dirty.. I know they test fire it so I didn't think much of it, but when I inspected the barrel it looked pretty worn and sorta scratched ... like it it went though a few hundred rounds... my sig when purchased brand new had 0 marks On the barrel ,is this common for this gun / normal?

I called academy they said they don't sell used guns, I know the guy sold me a new on in the box so it wasn't from the display.

2guh5pc.jpg


IMG_4257.jpg


IMG_4260.jpg


IMG_4263.jpg


Not my image below but this wear I also noticed on my gun
IMG_6212.jpg
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
All of them have at least a few rounds through them, but at intervals they run a higher number of rounds through one. That may be it.

I don't see anything to be concerned about.

(I have a 9mm Shield bought new as well).
 
I have seen new Sigs on the shelf with some barrel hood wear, but that looks excessive to me. Always inspect your purchase at the gun counter, especially since they have a no return policy. Just keep it lubed and you'll be fine.
 
Curious if someone at Academy needed a new barrel? Seriously that looks like ****. I have 2 and neither look that bad and I've shot 500+ through both.

That's what I was thinking, since the gun stayed 4 days after I purchased it... maybe someone swapped out their old barrel and took my new one.
 
No offense, but I've been reading claims that some firearms manufacturers don't test fire their pistols anymore and now we're complaining that they test fire them too much? I understand your concern, but probably the best thing to do is see how the barrel shoots. If it is inaccurate or there are malfunctions, then send it back. I buy most of my guns used and they have, what I consider, many tens of thousands of rounds still left in them.
 
I don't buy used guns that show that much wear! Something here does not make sense on that much barrel/hood wear at all for a 'new' gun. The slide seems to be OK. Perhaps it was a long time display model that had a whole lot of handling and racking of the slide??
Karl
 
That's a used gun. You should not pay a new price for it.

If you have not shot it and it looks like that, exchange it. Your state may have consumer protection laws that force the dealer to take it back within a certain time window.
 
They were just helping you by breaking it in for you

That barrel does look discolored but I usually look at the feed ramp to judge how used it is.
 
Hopefully you can return it? I'm an old woman when it comes to barrel wear - and that barrel looks very used. I took two Flock's to the range yesterday - and both barrels still look like new (G42 and 43). SIG uses a much better (I think) PVD finish on their barrels now so you wouldn't see anything like yours. I'm guessing the same as others have said here - somebody swapped out the barrel...

Edited to add: ThrowinRock's barrel looks like it has a PVD finish on it. Your's looks like cheap Parkerizing at best - somebody stuck it to ya.
 
Last edited:
I don't know about the frame, but that barrel definitely looks used. I've bought and sold a lot of guns and none of the barrels were even close to showing wear like that, even after lots of shooting. I agree with someone swapping it out. I'd avoid that dealer in the future!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
After enough rounds (maybe hundreds, probably thousands) you might get a barrel hood to look like that if it and the slide are at the opposite ends of their tolerance ranges. But NO manufacturer is going to "test" a gun to that extent and then try to sell it as new.

I wonder how dirty the insides of the action are - two or three test rounds should leave a little bit of powder residue down in the mag well and around the trigger parts of an otherwise brand new gun, but not much. The brass stripe in the middle of the slide (I forget what that ridge is called) looks like the remains of a LOT of shooting, too.

In any event, based just on the pictures, it looks like somebody pulled a swap on the barrel, and maybe the slide as well. I'd certainly take it back and get a new one (if there is one available.) If you can't find a new one, then at least get a BIG adjustment on this one as a (well) used gun.
 
I see your concern. It's probably fine but it's the principle of the matter. You just don't know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Okay so I went to academy today, they looked at the gun and agreed it looks worn. I asked to see another MP shield, they bought one out from the back and that one almost looked identical to mine, maybe slightly less worn on the top of the barrel where it says 9MM but almost the same wear on the barrel... they don't take back guns or return them, but they offered to ship it to S&W, im gonna test the gun at the range today and see how it performs ... but now not sure what to think....
 
Sadly this is a case of buyer beware.

The Lady M&P that she brought in April of this year had no wear marks on the barrel hood. It did have the brass marks on the bottom of the slide showing that it had been test fired.

600 rounds later it is beginning to show wear marks on the hood but nothing even close to yours.

I agree with shooting it before making a decision to send it back to S&W. However I wonder if S&W will replace the barrel under warranty strictly for cosmetic reasons.
 
Your barrel looks like it has been fired without sufficient lubrication. The question is, how much? I'm not sure that the factory test firing a few rounds could cause that much wear even if it was fired bone-dry. For comparison purposes, I've attached a couple of photos of the barrel from my Shield 9. It has 4900 rounds through it. And I do lubricate it!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0435.jpg
    IMG_0435.jpg
    188.6 KB · Views: 155
  • IMG_0434.jpg
    IMG_0434.jpg
    209.2 KB · Views: 131
Okay so I went to academy today, they looked at the gun and agreed it looks worn. I asked to see another MP shield, they bought one out from the back and that one almost looked identical to mine, maybe slightly less worn on the top of the barrel where it says 9MM but almost the same wear on the barrel... they don't take back guns or return them, but they offered to ship it to S&W, im gonna test the gun at the range today and see how it performs ... but now not sure what to think....
A buddy of mine bought a new M&P Shield in .45 ACP. He was put aback by the swirled tool marks under the slide. After research, he found out that's how S&W turns them out. Maybe since you saw others with similar finish loss, that's how they turn them out today. Sadly, it seems (and not just S&W) if it works and saves us money... ship 'em off! Actually, with the price point of plastic guns, and since they are pretty much butt ugly anyway, few customers probably really care.
 
Last edited:
I Shot it about an hr ago at the range, 150 rounds... accuracy was good , couldn't complain.. had one jam out of 150 but I think it was the ammo I used at that time.. it was Serbian ammo pretty cheap, the Winchester ammo was great, not a single jam...

I'm gonna call S&W anyways just to ask if they would swap the barrel ... I showed it to the guys at the gun range they looked at it and said they all pretty much look like that now... I even checked their shield they got for sale... same story ... same looking barrel as mine...

Not that I really care since the gun and barrel take wear over time anyways but when you buy new you expect perfect condition... my next firearm def won't be S&W.
 
...I'm gonna call S&W anyways just to ask if they would swap the barrel ... I showed it to the guys at the gun range they looked at it and said they all pretty much look like that now... I even checked their shield they got for sale... same story ... same looking barrel as mine...

Not that I really care since the gun and barrel take wear over time anyways but when you buy new you expect perfect condition... my next firearm def won't be S&W.

I don't understand what's happening at S&W. I have a 2 1/2 year-old 40c, a 2 year-old Shield 9, and 6 month-old Shield .45, and all of them came with perfectly finished unmarked barrels. If the current crop of Shield 9 barrels all look like yours, S&W needs to go back to what they were doing in the past to prevent wear marks during test firing. Would it seriously erode their profits to properly lubricate the barrels beforehand? No. What will seriously erode their profits will be permanently turning off customers by selling them beaten-up looking new guns.
 
Back
Top