Tanners Owner
US Veteran
I'd strongly consider it. I like the M&P platform and am intrigued by the 10mm.
Why do you think that? Both are uncommon calibers. 10mm has been around longer, but neither has really become popular like others. In fact, .40S&W is an off shoot of the 10mm and is 100x more popular than 10mm.I think 10mm is more popular than .357 Sig.
Why do you think that? Both are uncommon calibers. 10mm has been around longer, but neither has really become popular like others. In fact, .40S&W is an off shoot of the 10mm and is 100x more popular than 10mm.
I remain somewhat puzzled by the 10mm, a rimless cartridge (almost) equivalent to a .41 magnum. The cartridge is accurate and powerful enough for hunting, but many of the platforms chambering it suffer from "a 100yd cartridge in a 40 yard gun for accuracy." A revolver in .41 mag is more accurate for hunting.
So if not hunting, what then is the purpose, self defense? The ones I have shot zip right through anything simulating a human, and expend most of their energy on what lies beyond the target. If loaded down, it becomes a .40 S&W in power. So maybe defense from big angry predators is the best use for a 10mm semi auto?
Unfortunately, the most common use I have seen is destroying objects on the range and giggling like Beavis at the power, blast, and destruction, which certainly is a fun use for a range toy.
No, I would not want one in an M&P.
I don't understand this comment. Sonny Crocket carried a Bren 10 for a little bit, but mostly a S&W 645 and 4506 in .45ACP.Does this generation have any equivalent to my generations Sonny Crocket who carries a 357sig and goes after drug dealers? If not, then we (10mm folks) win that one![]()
The 10mm seems to be a niche caliber with a small cult following, dating back to Sunny Crockett in Miami Vice. Didn't see the need for 10mm then and don't see a need now.
I think the .357Sig was discontinued due to low sales not problems. At least I've never heard of problems unique to that caliber.
S&W had problems with the .357SIG M&P, and they eventually stopped offering that model.
I wonder whether they'd have similar problems with a 10mm M&P without major upgrades or a redesign?
Interesting. I don't remember that discussion, but I'm not a .357Sig fan so, I probably didn't follow it. I do find it unique that S&W said not to use a .357Sig barrel in a .40S&W gun because they are the exact same frame and slide and use the same mags.Do a search on this area of the forum using "NCHP SIG Problems" and you'll find a number of discussions and an extended series of messages about the NCHP situation. (My son is a NCHP Trooper, so I heard about it first hand.
The search results includes messages that recount conversations with S&W Customer Service who suggested NOT using .357 Conversion barrels in the 40 version of the M&P.
That said, I have NOT heard of others (civilians) complaining about problems.