Shield 2.0 9mm 8 round mag question

GKC

US Veteran
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
5,138
Reaction score
5,259
Location
Texas
The last Shield I had was the 45, and I'm sure most here are aware of the disassembly/reassembly difficulty with the 7 round magazine for that model. Is that the case with the 8 round magazine for the Shield 2.0 9mm? Just curious, really...I don't have a Shield 2.0 9mm...yet...and I tried searching for the answer but didn't find anything. Also, is anyone using the Pearce grip extensions on their 9mm mags? I liked them on my 6 round Shield 45 mags, when I had it.
 
Register to hide this ad
No, the disassembly of any of the 9mm/40mm magazines is simple and easily done with a small tool to depress the button on the bottom. Not a chore at all. And yes, I use the pearce grip extension on my 7 round magazines and prefer to carry with them. Makes the gun perfect hand size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKC
I've only taken apart the mags for my Shield (Pc 9) once to clean and it was a basic process. I also put a Pierce extension on my 7 rounder
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKC
The .45 has the 2 legs that need to snap into the baseplate. The 9/.40 does not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKC
The .45 has the 2 legs that need to snap into the baseplate. The 9/.40 does not.

Which makes me wonder why S&W couldn't have designed the .45 7 round magazine differently.
 
Never had an issue with the 9mm mag disassembly on mine. Basic design and function. It is odd that S&W would make the 45 mags different. Maybe to make sure they didn't accidently come apart because of the recoil?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKC
Never had an issue with the 9mm mag disassembly on mine. Basic design and function. It is odd that S&W would make the 45 mags different. Maybe to make sure they didn't accidently come apart because of the recoil?

The 6 round mag for the Shield 45 is just like the other magazines (9/40.) The 7 round magazine is the one with the different design. I don't know why...the tubes are the same, it's just the floor and base plate that's different. So, I don't think it has to do with recoil. Maybe it was just designed on a Friday 13th by an engineer with either a wicked sense of humor or retirement papers filed.
 
Back
Top