Tightgroup powder in Winchester .45 ACP cases

Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
2,099
Reaction score
6,553
Location
Taranaki, New Zealand
About 5 years ago I began to load with Tightgroup powder. It soon became my "go to" powder for almost all of my pistol reloading except for lighter loads in my .45 auto (for Service and Wild Bunch shooting), 38 S&W and .32 auto.

About 3 years ago I was in a competition with my Springfield Armoury 1911 A 1 .45. My ammunition was a 200 gn plated flat point bullet over 5.1 gn Tightgroup (max listed land on Hodgdon's website for the .45/200 gn is 5.2 gn's). This had previously chronographed at major power factor for me but at the chronograph that weekend I failed to make major and ended up shooting .45 minor for the weekend.:(

After this I spent a few weeks experimenting with my loading. I gradually worked up in .1 gn increments to a load that made major PF with enough reserve. This was around .5 gn above the max published load.

Over time I received some comments about the loudness of my pistol discharges and someone once said they saw a muzzle flash out of the barrel, but overall the recoil did not feel excessive, the primers showed no signs of excess pressure and my pistol shot accurately with these loads.

Some time ago I was experimenting with 200 gn cast lead SWC projectiles. I did not have a sizing die and some of the projectiles were dropping oversize, uptown .458". While loading up a test batch (using the same load of Tightgroup as for the PFP bullets) a couple of the cast projectiles got stuck in either the sizing or crimping die, and I ended up having to pull the dies down to push them out.

I believed I had been pretty careful to ensure no double charges occurred, but while test firing these one round detonated. I ended up with small fragments of brass in my cheek and my pistol was stuck with the slide closed. When I got it open I found a Winchester case (I generally use Starline so it might have been a range pick up) had blown at the web. The gun was not damaged and I put the incident down to a possible powder overcharge due to the sizing/crimping die issues or possibly brass weekend by previous firings. I pulled the rest of the test ammo apart and decided to stick with my plated bullets even for practice.

Back in June and July I was preparing for both the North Island IPSC Champs at the end of September and our IPSC Nationals in November. Between these two events I was traveling in the US. I loaded up the North Island ammunition using my many times fired Starline (and range pick up) brass. For the Nationals I decided to buy 500 new cases to load. Then only ones available to me were Winchester cases which I sourced from two gun shops, one local and one in Auckland. All of the ammunition for both competitions was barrel dropped as part of the loading process.

At the North Islands my gun and ammunition performed as usual. Not quite flawlessly but pretty close (two failures to extract and one failure to ignite the primer)

Day one of the Nationals and I was shooting the loads in Winchester cases mixed in with about 200 rounds left over from the North Island competition. On the third stage I made the first magazine change and fired the next shot. There was an obvious case failure. The slide locked open and I again got some primer/brass fragments in my cheek. (The R/O called "stop" so I got the reshoot after having the pistol checked over).

The case had failed at the web and the next one in the magazine had detonated. Fortunately the detonated case had just blown apart and the primer pushed out. The slide on my pistol was not stuck, but the footplate in my brand new Wilson Combat mag was blown and the spring twisted out of shape :mad:. Two gunsmiths on the range examined my pistol. The slide rail was buckled slightly and there was a small crack inside the slide, but the pistol was usable.

The blown cases were both Winchester. Consensus was that the primers were showing no signs of overpressure and that the web on the Winchester cases was thinner than on the Starline ones. One very experienced shooter went so far as to say that this is a known issue with Winchester cases which can regularly blow.

Over the rest of the day I had a few more cases where the web failed and two with cracked cases running from the mouth towards the base of the case. I changed to my spare pistol, a Chinese made Norinco Ranger built like a tank as I didn't want any more damage to my Springfield.

Early on day two I had another total case failure. This time the head of the case blew out leaving the rest of the case in the chamber the R/O did not call "stop so no reshoot :(). The case remains came out easily once I got the pistol disassembled using a pair of needle nose pliers to pull it out gently. Again the second round had detonated destroying a magazine floor plate :mad::mad:. One of the revolver shooters on the squad behind us and just been DQ'd for dropping his gun and he volunteered to make the 20 minute drive each way to pick me up some factory ammunition (Winchester 230 gn JHP at 202 PF). Luckily I had been first shooter on the stage, was last shooter on the next and we had a lunch break in between stages so I had the time to wait for the ammo to arrive. I shot the rest of the match with this ammunition and my Springfield pistol.

The first thing I did when I got home was to check the powder drop on my .45 ACP press. After making 10 drops I weighed the next five. Four were right on the powder weight I have been shooting for over 3 years, the fifth was .1 gn low.

I took two blown cases plus a dozen once fired ones into my LGS. They have a program that showed my load at slightly over 16,500 PSI, warm but not in the overcharge category (17,000 PSI and above). They examined the once fired cases using a scope and saw cracks in all but one case.

I returned to my loading bench and loaded up some test loads, a max published load of Tightgroup together with two more, each . 2 gn higher but under my usual loading. I also loaded up some cases using the same bullets and W231 powder at 5.5 and 5.7 gn (max load for 200 gn jacketed bullet listed at 5.9 gn). Yesterday I got to the range early and set up my chronograph.

Both three and five rounds of the maximum published load of Tightgroup under the 200 gn PFP bullet gave a PF of 158.6, well under the 170 PF to make major.

An additional .2 gn resulted in a PF of 164.8 for 5 rounds, 166.3 for the first 3 rounds.

Another .2 gn gave me 171.2 PF for the first three shots but this dropped to 169.7 for five rounds due to one veery low velocity.

My up to now usual load, left over from the North Island competition and sorted out from the remaining Winchester cases, resulted in a 173.9 PF for both the first 3 and all 5 rounds.

Both of the 231 loads gave me PF's in the high 140's/low 150's for 3 and 5 rounds respectively.

The powder pressure program my LGS uses gave pressures at under 14,000 PSI for both 231 loads and under 15,000 PSI for a load more than .5 grain over the maximum published under the 200 gn jacketed bullet.

It seems a change of powder is in the future for my .45 ACP loads, along with a new Tanfoglio Witness 1911 A1 pistol which I have ordered as the cost of a new pistol compared to a new slide for my Springfield and having it machined for my sights is definitely cost effective. I will have the rail straightened on the Springfield slide but the gun will be confined to shooting Service and Classic Pistol Matches from now on where the PF is a lot lower (120 minimum).

Anyone have a good recipe for 230 gn LRN at 650 FPS???
 
Register to hide this ad
Nothing wrong with your powder choice.

A dangerous load will sometimes have a greater report than something safe.

A computer program is only a computer program and may not necessarily be a reliable indicator of pressure, particularly if input is incorrect.

With regard to reading primers - often the appearance tells you nothing.

If loads are book maximum or over book maximum, even a very small decrease in case capacity can raise pressure dangerously. A different batch of brass, even if the same brand can also be a contributing factor here.

It would seem if cases are blowing out, an overload could certainly be the reason.

Explain "detonation". I think it may be used inaccurately here.

I'd back off the powder charge and try again.
 
Itiegroup is EXCELLENT powder for target loads, which account for 99% of my handgun loads. I've read numerous sources that it's more popular that Bullseye among target competitors, which isn't surprising. Titegroup is new technology. Bullseye is a better than a century old...and it's a very dirty powder.

BTW, from memory alone, I use 5 grains (or less) of Titegroup and 200 grain LSWC bullets when loading .45 ACP. It's accurate & mild, & a lotta fun to shoot.
 
I run 4.9gns Int'l Clay's (max for AP50, I interpolate for AS50) behind a xtp 230gn with WLP primers, Starline brass. Accurate target loads. It's touchy!
 
If you want to make Major then I would suggest that you get yourself some Accurate #5, it is the "Bees Knees" for the 45 ACP and was specifically designed for the 45 ACP. Another plus for #5 is that it meters superbly, so no concerns about load variation once you have your powder measure set.

As for Titegroup, I won't use it for ANY handgun load. Yeah it is "cheap" but add up the cost of repairing your Springfield and you will find Titegroup is NOT as cheap as you thought. The problem with Titegroup is that it is really a Shotgun powder where the powder is nearly compressed if you are using the correct wad for your load. Note, the hint here is you should consider taking up the Shotgun so you can use your stock for what it was designed for. Try pushing it into handgun loads and someday you will end up seriously injuring your self. Because it is a powder that make it VERY easy to load a Double or even Triple charge, so think about what can happen if you get first hand experience with what a Double Charge can actually do. Hello Right Hand, it was nice to know you and I'm really sorry I blew you apart. Do you get the Hint? First don't use Titegroup for Handgun loads. Second if you are in a competition and have an ammunition failure STOP USING IT and put into Quarantine. You were very lucky to have only had a few scratches and cracked slide due to you poor choice to continue using ammunition that you knew was defective.

PS; I was not kidding about the Shotgun thing. Once you start hitting 4 inch targets moving at 50-70 KPH you start to consider shooting at a paper target that just sits there as a biit too easy.
 
Do you have pictures of the primers on the blown cases? Slight over charges in 45 ACP will not show up in primers. The same primers can be used in 44 Magnum and 45 ACP. If the case was doubled charged he primer will show it.

45 ACP brass should be able to handle pretty hot loads if the chamber has reasonable support. If the gun fires out of battery it's anyone's guess.

I'd guess a double charge that was missed because you were flustered due to the bullets getting stuck in the crimp die. When stuff like that happens it's easy to get PO'd and distracted.
 
Nothing wrong with your powder choice.

Explain "detonation". I think it may be used inaccurately here.

I'd back off the powder charge and try again.

Detonation = top round in the mag: case blown open, bullet jacket blown off, lead core flattened, primer blown out.

I have wine backed off the charge and worked my way back up again to reach PF, and with identical results both times.

What is puzzling to me is that with the exception of the lead SWC incident these case failures have all been brand new Winchester cases. Starline and Remington-Peters cases have not been effected, even after many reloadings.
 
Do you have pictures of the primers on the blown cases? Slight over charges in 45 ACP will not show up in primers. The same primers can be used in 44 Magnum and 45 ACP. If the case was doubled charged he primer will show it.

45 ACP brass should be able to handle pretty hot loads if the chamber has reasonable support. If the gun fires out of battery it's anyone's guess.

I'd guess a double charge that was missed because you were flustered due to the bullets getting stuck in the crimp die. When stuff like that happens it's easy to get PO'd and distracted.

The primers on the blown cases (where still present) looked exactly the same as on the Starline cases.

One issue is that the barrel in my Springfield is unsupported.
 
If you want to make Major then I would suggest that you get yourself some Accurate #5, it is the "Bees Knees" for the 45 ACP and was specifically designed for the 45 ACP. Another plus for #5 is that it meters superbly, so no concerns about load variation once you have your powder measure set.

As for Titegroup, I won't use it for ANY handgun load. Yeah it is "cheap" but add up the cost of repairing your Springfield and you will find Titegroup is NOT as cheap as you thought. The problem with Titegroup is that it is really a Shotgun powder where the powder is nearly compressed if you are using the correct wad for your load. Note, the hint here is you should consider taking up the Shotgun so you can use your stock for what it was designed for. Try pushing it into handgun loads and someday you will end up seriously injuring your self. Because it is a powder that make it VERY easy to load a Double or even Triple charge, so think about what can happen if you get first hand experience with what a Double Charge can actually do. Hello Right Hand, it was nice to know you and I'm really sorry I blew you apart. Do you get the Hint? First don't use Titegroup for Handgun loads. Second if you are in a competition and have an ammunition failure STOP USING IT and put into Quarantine. You were very lucky to have only had a few scratches and cracked slide due to you poor choice to continue using ammunition that you knew was defective.

PS; I was not kidding about the Shotgun thing. Once you start hitting 4 inch targets moving at 50-70 KPH you start to consider shooting at a paper target that just sits there as a biit too easy.

24,492 PSI for A#5 max load with a 200 gn jacketed bullet versus under 17,000 PSI for TG? And as for metering I have many times dropped and weighed 10 charges of Tightgroup in several calibers with only 1 or 2 variations of .1 grain + or -, so metering is not an issue.

Since the issue with he lead SWC load I have been meticulous in checking charged cases for powder levels. Triple charge and the case is full to the rim. Double charge and I can easily see it on my reloading setup.

Still I am open to a lower pressure powder, hence my trying out 231 again.
 
I run 4.9gns Int'l Clay's (max for AP50, I interpolate for AS50) behind a xtp 230gn with WLP primers, Starline brass. Accurate target loads. It's touchy!

I haven't tried Clays but I generally use AP50N for my light (120-130 PF) and medium (155 PF) .45 loads, .38 S&W and .32 auto rounds. It meters okay but is not as consistent in powder drops out of my measure as Tightgroup and some other powders.
 
Itiegroup is EXCELLENT powder for target loads, which account for 99% of my handgun loads. I've read numerous sources that it's more popular that Bullseye among target competitors, which isn't surprising. Titegroup is new technology. Bullseye is a better than a century old...and it's a very dirty powder.

BTW, from memory alone, I use 5 grains (or less) of Titegroup and 200 grain LSWC bullets when loading .45 ACP. It's accurate & mild, & a lotta fun to shoot.

And I guess that is what has caused my issues. Major PF loads are definitely not target loads, hence my decision to change powders even though in past testing W231 has not been as accurate in my gun
 
I haven't shot any competition with power factors for years. When I did, a 200 gr. H&G lead swc bullet with 5.7 gr. of WW231 was the load that I and very many other shooters used in the 45 a.c.p. This load always made major with no problems. I did notice that you said you tried 5.7 231 and a 200gr bullet but it was jacketed. Lead bullets will give higher velocities with less pressure.

Dan
 
Did I understand you to say your loads are a full half grain above published max - which in this case amounts to being roughly 10% over the max charge?
And you're blowing out cases in used brass?
Sounds like it is definitely time to switch powders if you have to overload it that way to make the desired PF.
Either that or toss all the used Winchester brass.
 
Last edited:
Titegroup meters extremely well. Ok, it is dense and attention must be paid not to double charge. I use a flashlight on my Dillon and make it a hard rule to look into every case before seating.

I just read the USPSA and IDPA monthly journals and I recall that a vast majority of shooters use TG exclusively, I mean some 80 % or so depending on division (I cite from memory). To suggest not to use it in handguns goes against the grain of 10s of thousands of competition shooters who shoot and average of a million rounds downrange with that powder every week.
 
Did I understand you to say your loads are a full half grain above published max - which in this case amounts to being roughly 10% over the max charge?
And you're blowing out cases in used brass?
Sounds like it is definitely time to switch powders if you have to overload it that way to make the desired PF.
Either that or toss all the used Winchester brass.

Actually, with one exception, it was the new Winchester brass that failed. All my old brass, including some head stamped W-W, has stood up to this load for 3 years.

But yeah, I think it is past time to switch powders, or invest in a new supported barrel and hope it doesn't happen again :(:eek::(

Switching powders sounds much safer.

As for overcharging, some time ago I noticed that maximum loads in several rifle calibers with one particular powder were now much lower than they had been several years ago. And I know of several pistol shooters who are loading 5-10% above published maximum loads to make PF in their pistols with other powders, including W231. But the lower pressure curve of 231 should make it a safer proposition if that is what I have to do.

When the new 1911 arrives I will retest my underpowered (in my Springfield) Tightgroup loads to see if there is a difference between guns.
 
Last edited:
I haven't shot any competition with power factors for years. When I did, a 200 gr. H&G lead swc bullet with 5.7 gr. of WW231 was the load that I and very many other shooters used in the 45 a.c.p. This load always made major with no problems. I did notice that you said you tried 5.7 231 and a 200gr bullet but it was jacketed. Lead bullets will give higher velocities with less pressure.

Dan

Funnily enough a charge of 5.7 gn W231 gave me a slightly higher 3 round average velocity but a lower 5 round average than the 5.5 gn load with he 200 gn plated flat point bullet.
 
Titegroup meters extremely well. Ok, it is dense and attention must be paid not to double charge. I use a flashlight on my Dillon and make it a hard rule to look into every case before seating.

I just read the USPSA and IDPA monthly journals and I recall that a vast majority of shooters use TG exclusively, I mean some 80 % or so depending on division (I cite from memory). To suggest not to use it in handguns goes against the grain of 10s of thousands of competition shooters who shoot and average of a million rounds downrange with that powder every week.

I have found Tightgroup to be well named in a number of pistol calibers (.45 ACP, 38 Special, 9mm, 44/40 and .45 Colt). In .38 Special a load .2 gn under max for +P delivers very good 50 yard groups for me.

In one 9mm .2 gn under max is my favoured load. In another, where I was using .38 Super magazines and seating the bullet out slightly, there was no difference in velocity between the max load and .2 gn over, but the hotter load shot smaller groups.

My cowboy loads are really plinking or target velocity loads and again shoot very well in my guns.
 
.45ACP is why I keep Tightgroup around; I don't use it for anything else. My usual load is 4.6 grains, which gets 830fps with a 230 grain coated RN from a 5" barrel. If you want to get less than 700fps with 230 grain lead, I think that will be less than 4 grains. I haven't tried to go that low, so I don't know. I tried 4.2 grains once and still got 790fps with the same parameters as above.
 
I've been using 4.4 grains of TiteGroup with a 230 grain plated bullet for the last 3 to 4 years. I've never had a problem with this load.
 
More than likely you got a double or over charge. Primary reason I hate TG, the tiny charge is hard to see & with a moment of negligence can easily double. Like the mystery Bullseye/38sp detonations, most were reloader error & double charges. Easy to do on most presses including ss presses loading from a block.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top