Odd failure mode.

I wouldn't be surprised that if you cleaned the chamber as soon as you had the issue, the gun would work normally.

Just out of curiosity-Have you chrono'ed those 748 loads? And as far as the BDC in your scope; What bullet/velocity is it spec'd for?


I sometimes carry a nylon brush to the range for just that reason. Once I manage to clear the jam, brushing the chamber thoroughly makes the gun run normally again.
BDC is designed for military 55g ball ammo. My 55g W748 load has chronoed at 3009 fps, measured 15' from the muzzle. I have a 16" barrel.
 
That confirms it-carbon build up.Your Varget load burns cleaner as do most factory loads. Don't think not having a chrome chamber or barrel has anything to do with the problem. The chrome chamber was done to prevent corrosion caused by high humidity mixed with very hot gas. Chrome lining in barrel was done to extend barrel life caused by rapid repeated mag dumps. Personally, I would stay with the Varget loads.
Either that or try a different powder. As to your comment about 335, it's close but the real GI stuff uses a non-canister grade powder. Only time that I know of where the load data to match factory loads was readily available was when Hornady intro'd the 6.5Creedmoor 140gr ELD-M. They stated to duplicate their load was to use a specific charge of H4350.
 
Last edited:
OK, the powders we buy in canisters (canister grade) is a powder produced by blending different lots of that powder (all of which have slightly different burning rates) to produce the burning rate specified by the maker for that particular canister/consumer powder. This is very similar to the process of making blended alcoholic beverages. It's also why you should be somewhat cautious when trying a new lot of any powder as the burning rates can still vary somewhat.

Non-canister grade powders are what the arsenals/large ammo makers use. This arrives at the plants in barrels. Each barrel must be tested for burning rate and loading data computed from that burning rate. As a result, the WXYZ powder used by ammo companies isn't the same as the WXYZ powder consumers buy. How great the differences between the powders are is usually unknown and may not include special additives like flash suppressants.

A second point is that for large orders (and where someone else is assuming liability), powder companies are willing to cook up special powders that may or may not ever reach the consumers. (A brief note: I've got a lot of XM118LR ammo that's allegedly loaded with a powder I'd never heard of.) Recently, there have been a variety of new powders introduced that were probably produced in this way. However, what we get is still a canister grade version that may not include things like flash suppressing chemicals.

It's very helpful to know exactly what you're trying to accomplish. A different powder would seem to be the best way to try to accomplish this. Have you actually tested how well ball ammo matches the pre-calculated reticule and/or chrono'd the various ammos?

Over decades I've tried a few of those magic reticules and found that they are, at best, a ball park approximation of where a specific bullet is going to be. That's also going to vary by altitude, barometric pressure, humidity and temperature (combination referred to as density altitude). As a result the ball park can be of impressive size. You may find that matching a calculated trajectory is difficult/impossible. A mil-dot reticule would be more work to learn but is more flexible than any BDC. Neither is really necessary for the .223/5.56 mm.
 
Last edited:
One more thing in trying to match that BDC. What was the BC of the bullet used? The BC might not make much of a difference at shorter ranges, but when you get out there it does. Ran the ballistics of 3 different 55gr fmj's. Out at 600yds, the difference between the highest and lowest BC's is 15.5" of drop. Comparing your Hornady to the Sierra, the Sierra has 10.5" less of drop.
 
I had the AR out at the range a few days ago. I shot 12 rounds loaded with CFE 223 and 19 with Varget. No failures encountered. When I opened the action to look for fouling, the BCG and locking lugs were still clean. There was mild fouling in the chamber, which brushed out easily.
I think that I should just be using a more clean burning powder.
 
Back
Top