Smith & Wesson CSX?

Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
11,933
Reaction score
18,277
Location
Republic of Texas
Register to hide this ad
From the short bit offered, it looks like a direct competitor and lower cost alternative to the Wilson EDCx9.

I could see my best gun bro grabbing one of these, so this kinda excites me just for him. I bet he will be on the early QC staff (unpaid of course!) for this one!

I’ll report back if that happens.
 
Okay, while that is a point — I would ask how relevant a point that is to S&W. This is company that debuted the M&P 10mm… only about a dozen years later than the public begged and cried for it. This is the company that released the S&W Governor after all the goofballs that actually wanted a silly .410 revolver had ten years of throwing money at Taurus.

So yes, solid question, has S&W done the market research?

Lemme ask this… how often DOES Smith & Wesson do their research on what folks want?! While CZ, Beretta, FN and SAR keep making and selling DA/SA metal frame handguns, S&W long ago gave up on their legendary 3rd Gen pistol and all evidence suggests that S&W does not really genuinely care what we think.
 
Okay, while that is a point — I would ask how relevant a point that is to S&W. This is company that debuted the M&P 10mm… only about a dozen years later than the public begged and cried for it. This is the company that released the S&W Governor after all the goofballs that actually wanted a silly .410 revolver had ten years of throwing money at Taurus.

So yes, solid question, has S&W done the market research?

Lemme ask this… how often DOES Smith & Wesson do their research on what folks want?! While CZ, Beretta, FN and SAR keep making and selling DA/SA metal frame handguns, S&W long ago gave up on their legendary 3rd Gen pistol and all evidence suggests that S&W does not really genuinely care what we think.

Yet “We” keep buying their products and making them rich. :cool:
 
My last new S&W purchase was in the early to mid 90's I think. I do own one of their Shield 45s, which I really do like. However, all of my other S&Ws are pre-lock revolvers or 3rd gen pistols. I do like the fact that the hammer is exposed on this one. Hope to fondle one soon.
 
I would like it in DA/SA also. I don't trust "cocked and locked" (Condition 1) without a grip safety. The thumb safety is too easy to accidentally disengage IMHO. In DA/SA, with hammer down/safety off configuration, it would probably entice me to drop my Glock in favor of it for EDC.

BTW, it took me quite a while to get used to carrying a Glock for EDC. I'm EXTREMELY careful putting it in and taking it out of holsters. Once the trigger is covered, not so bad. With a hammer DA/SA gun, the trigger pull is longer and you can put your thumb on the hammer to detect movement while holstering.
 
Last edited:
Three. My last new S&W purchase is a 617-6 2 1/2 years ago. The only others were an M&P15 and a 60-15, both purchased more than a year before. Otherwise, used J's, a third-gen, and pre-K's before and since.
 
Back
Top