Customer calmly takes out robber at liquor store.

coltle6920

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
4,476
Reaction score
8,900
Location
Denver,Colorado
Customer is in liquor store to buy some beer when a person comes in attempting to rob the place. Customer is carrying concealed and proceeds to take out alleged robber without putting down his sixpack of beer.

Took place at a liquor store in Michigan.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot-2023-08-19-at-8.jpg
    Screenshot-2023-08-19-at-8.jpg
    82.8 KB · Views: 565
Register to hide this ad
I don’t see anything that would suggest he’s in hot water. ????

This part has me thinking he might...notice I said might, and that I think he might...not that he will.

"The customer, who has a valid concealed carry permit, told police he couldn’t see what was in the robber’s hand, but he could see the look of fear on the clerk’s face."

A look of fear aint much to go on, as far as he knew at the time he pulled the trigger, the perp might have been holding a pack of M&M's. At least thats how its being reported, and what I based my comment on.
 
To remind you, the 9/11 plane hijackers only had box cutters. No, not a threat to life and limb at all.

Would have you thought differently if he'd had a 3-inch pocketknife? A 4-inch paring knife? A meat cleaver? What is the acceptable standard for defining a cutting tool as a deadly weapon?

Good grief...you could have asked what I based my opinion on before this.
 
Looking forward to seeing how the DA handles this case. In some jurisdictions, the customer would get prosecuted while the robber walks.
 
That's a public DA who doesn't want to commit to a position in a public forum. That is a boiler plate response and I'll bet there will be no charges in the end.
 
Good grief...you could have asked what I based my opinion on before this.

Good grief . . . you could have stated what you based your opinion on at the time. Now that that's all clear, the shooter once again demonstrates to the to not blab to LE.
 
One need not be factually correct, although it helps. They need to be reasonable. Given the observations the shooter could make and describe, one would have to be a blithering idiot to not conclude that there was a robbery in progress.

Most lawyers (including prosecutors) don't know a darned thing about use of force. I doubt my class spent more than 2 hours on it during Crim Law 1, and the nuances of use of force and tactics of encounter likely hundreds of hours of study to have a sufficient grasp.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top