Bright Stainless Model 67 No Dash

Joined
May 16, 2005
Messages
15,835
Reaction score
38,522
Location
Oregon
I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.
 
Register to hide this ad
After the work Virgil617 had done that ought to be a great shooter! Nice revolver. 👍
 
Early model 67

I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.

Mine is also an early model. Trigger is a forged smooth CT. Trigger was installed at factory as part of an action job. Stocks are reshaped smooth target. Great gun for DA shooting. It was nice to get the original box and paperwork. A price sticker for $175 is still on the box.

The model 67 was a great gun. If I could only have one this would probably be it.
 

Attachments

  • 47898C33-8E0D-4F38-8C10-30222AC033D1.jpg
    47898C33-8E0D-4F38-8C10-30222AC033D1.jpg
    87 KB · Views: 128
It's a 50 year old gun. And has been to Europe (Germany?) and back. Nonetheless, it just sparkles, is so shiny, and flawless on its stainless surface. I think, gotta be, some previous owner put some serious elbow grease (Scotch-Brite?) into it, somewhere recently, along the way.

Lucky me! :)
 
O.P. probably the best looking 67 I have ever seen!
I have a 67 no dash from 1973. Same sights as yours. Mine is a shooter. Not as polished as yours. Bob
 

Attachments

  • P1050953.jpg
    P1050953.jpg
    213.9 KB · Views: 76
I'm not a fan of the 1960s Cadillac bumper look so I had the brushed finish restored on the no-dash Model 67 I bought that had been polished. I have the correct Magna stocks for it but prefer the look of checkered targets. The dull appearance on the left side of the muzzle is light reflection.

Ed
 

Attachments

  • 67-NDa.jpg
    67-NDa.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 136
  • 67-NDb.jpg
    67-NDb.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 104
It's a 50 year old gun. And has been to Europe (Germany?) and back. Nonetheless, it just sparkles, is so shiny, and flawless on its stainless surface. I think, gotta be, some previous owner put some serious elbow grease (Scotch-Brite?) into it, somewhere recently, along the way.

Lucky me! :)

seems to me that it has German proof marks (on left side of the frame above the yoke and on the barrel)

regards from Germany
Ulrich
 
Thank you, Ulrich. I think you are correct. I found similar markings on a Colt posted on the internet, and the seller thought he had been told Germany as well. Perhaps a police gun?
 
Love my old 67. This one was with me for my first 4 years on the LAPD. I bought it upon retirement, then sent it off to S&W for a bead blast and action tune. Grips are the original Pachmayrs I put on in the Academy. Holster is a Hoyt.
Bob

mAo9C6t.jpg
 
Last edited:
I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.

Never seen stainless polished so well. Had I seen that somewhere else, I'd have said it was a nickel M15, were it not for the hammer and trigger..
 
I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.
Never seen stainless polished so well. Had I seen that somewhere else, I'd have said it was a nickel M15, were it not for the hammer and trigger..
I was in a shop once and the guy handed me what he said was a model 60. I told him it could not be because they did not make model 60s with a nickel finish. Opened the cylinder and sure enough, it was highly polished and looked beautiful

Robert
 
Back
Top