Bright Stainless Model 67 No Dash

Joined
May 16, 2005
Messages
15,956
Reaction score
38,920
Location
Oregon
I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.
 
Register to hide this ad
After the work Virgil617 had done that ought to be a great shooter! Nice revolver. 👍
 
Early model 67

I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.

Mine is also an early model. Trigger is a forged smooth CT. Trigger was installed at factory as part of an action job. Stocks are reshaped smooth target. Great gun for DA shooting. It was nice to get the original box and paperwork. A price sticker for $175 is still on the box.

The model 67 was a great gun. If I could only have one this would probably be it.
 

Attachments

  • 47898C33-8E0D-4F38-8C10-30222AC033D1.jpg
    47898C33-8E0D-4F38-8C10-30222AC033D1.jpg
    87 KB · Views: 128
It's a 50 year old gun. And has been to Europe (Germany?) and back. Nonetheless, it just sparkles, is so shiny, and flawless on its stainless surface. I think, gotta be, some previous owner put some serious elbow grease (Scotch-Brite?) into it, somewhere recently, along the way.

Lucky me! :)
 
O.P. probably the best looking 67 I have ever seen!
I have a 67 no dash from 1973. Same sights as yours. Mine is a shooter. Not as polished as yours. Bob
 

Attachments

  • P1050953.jpg
    P1050953.jpg
    213.9 KB · Views: 76
I'm not a fan of the 1960s Cadillac bumper look so I had the brushed finish restored on the no-dash Model 67 I bought that had been polished. I have the correct Magna stocks for it but prefer the look of checkered targets. The dull appearance on the left side of the muzzle is light reflection.

Ed
 

Attachments

  • 67-NDa.jpg
    67-NDa.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 136
  • 67-NDb.jpg
    67-NDb.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 104
It's a 50 year old gun. And has been to Europe (Germany?) and back. Nonetheless, it just sparkles, is so shiny, and flawless on its stainless surface. I think, gotta be, some previous owner put some serious elbow grease (Scotch-Brite?) into it, somewhere recently, along the way.

Lucky me! :)

seems to me that it has German proof marks (on left side of the frame above the yoke and on the barrel)

regards from Germany
Ulrich
 
Thank you, Ulrich. I think you are correct. I found similar markings on a Colt posted on the internet, and the seller thought he had been told Germany as well. Perhaps a police gun?
 
Love my old 67. This one was with me for my first 4 years on the LAPD. I bought it upon retirement, then sent it off to S&W for a bead blast and action tune. Grips are the original Pachmayrs I put on in the Academy. Holster is a Hoyt.
Bob

mAo9C6t.jpg
 
Last edited:
I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.

Never seen stainless polished so well. Had I seen that somewhere else, I'd have said it was a nickel M15, were it not for the hammer and trigger..
 
I recently bought this Model 67 no dash from vigil617 here in the forum classifieds. As he noted in his ad, he'd bought it a few years ago from The Attic, an importer and Gunbroker seller, but had decided to pass it on.

While the gun came with a nice set of K targets, I slipped on these Don Collins ivories to dress it up:





The ivories look pretty good with the bright stainless, right?

As he noted in his ad, before selling the gun, vigil67 asked forum member BMCM, a talented gunsmith, to look it over and evaluate it. BMCM found significant issues and repaired them, restoring the gun to perfect working order.*

The work required, and cost, were not insignificant. Vigil617 shared the documentation with me. Most of us here, certainly not I, would have been unable to see any problems just by looking at the gun. That he ensured that the gun was in good order before selling it shows that he is a stand up guy and a credit to our forum.

The gun, being an early model — DOB of 1972 per the SCSW — has stainless rear sights, a desirable feature for collectors (if not for shooters):



I was of two minds about this. I want to shoot the gun. As I have gotten older, even with prescription shooting glasses, the sights have become harder for me to see. I discussed this with BMCM, who was very generous with his advice on how to replace the stainless rear sights. But then I got to thinking: I've been painting my front sights yellow. (I'm red-green-brown colorblind, but yellow stands out well for me.) I like the paint approach, because the Teslor model paint I use comes off easily with acetone. Since the stainless sights are desirable, maybe just paint them black? If it worked well, would be a simple, effective, and easily reversible approach.

Last night I painted the front and rear sights:



Looks pretty good to me!

I also don't want to use the ivories at the range — I've been practicing with a speed loader recently — so put on these Pachmayrs I got off eBay.



Ready for the range:



I'm thinking to do some shooting with it at my club later this week. Can't wait!

*Not that I understand this all that well, but for those who do, vigil617 shared the documentation with me, and BMCM kindly volunteered to discuss it with me: He found that it had an excessive barrel to cylinder gap of 0.013", that the ejector rod runout measured at 0.025", that the yoke tube was bent/misaligned by approximately 0.020", that the yoke had been stretched by use of a tubing cutter style tool, and that the cylinder end shake was at 0.001".

He removed the barrel and set back torque shoulder one thread revolution or 0.028", shortened the ejector rod and center pin, corrected ejector run out, installed barrel and faced to set gap at 0.006", cut the forcing cone to 18°, and reamed yoke tube and corrected misalignment.
Never seen stainless polished so well. Had I seen that somewhere else, I'd have said it was a nickel M15, were it not for the hammer and trigger..
I was in a shop once and the guy handed me what he said was a model 60. I told him it could not be because they did not make model 60s with a nickel finish. Opened the cylinder and sure enough, it was highly polished and looked beautiful

Robert
 
I have the same, but mind sure doesn't shine like yours, and love the grips care to post link to buy set for my revolver.
 
Onomea, that is a beauty. The ivories go perfectly with that bright finish. I suspect a lot of us polished those early 67s and 66s back in the day. I know I did. I sent my '72 model 66 back to S&W many years ago to be overhauled. While they had it, they redid the factory brushed finish. The only original parts of my old gun are the frame, side plate and rear sight. Not near as pretty as yours.
 
I really like all these posts and reply's on the 67's. I would like to know if the 67 would handle .38+Ps? I just always bought 66's instead. It looks just as good as 66's though. Never sell your guns and keep in your families.
 
Summer 1974, I had $350 burning a hole in my pocket from Air Force ROTC summer training. I walked into a Lodi, NJ gun shop, and there was a 67 No Dash, stainless sights and all. One pistol permit (NJ sucks) later I had parted with the majority of that $$ and was the proud owner.

So, on a spring 1975 flight home from VMI, a connection took me through DC and was too late to check baggage. I told the agent I had a gun in the bag and she said, "you're not supposed to joke about that"...and then big as life on the x-ray screen. My compadre - who later became quite an Air Force lawyer - started talking, the checker said "I thought he was joking" and they let us off - the pilot put the piece in cockpit, I got it back after we landed.

Later sold it but always regretted it...so last year, a very nice unfired mint condition no-dash popped up on GB. They'll bury that one with me....
 
Oldcorps76: Love the story. Thanks!

Also, thanks to everyone else who has kindly commented.

(I sincerely appreciate your appreciation of my 67.:):cool:)
 
Last edited:
Love ivory on stainless.

Here's my 1858 Uberti with .45 Colt conversion cylinder.
 

Attachments

  • 040188E1-2E2C-466C-A9AF-2C2E183373E3.jpg
    040188E1-2E2C-466C-A9AF-2C2E183373E3.jpg
    82 KB · Views: 23
I don't think it was a police gun. Revolvers are some kind of oddities in German police equipment, they usually go with semi-autos since the 1920s (Walther PP and PPK were the standard back then). But each gun sold in Germany has to have proof marks, otherwise it's illegal to sell. Quite sure it was a privatly owned gun.


Thank you, Ulrich. I think you are correct. I found similar markings on a Colt posted on the internet, and the seller thought he had been told Germany as well. Perhaps a police gun?
 
This one was obtained from a friend whose father had been a gunsmith and gun shop owner in Nashville, back in the day. I paid, at the time, market plus value but, it now has a value in excess of what I paid.

The fact that it shoots to the point of aim is expected from this model and its twin, the Model 15.

This is my Model 67, no dash.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0228.jpeg
    IMG_0228.jpeg
    93.2 KB · Views: 16
Back
Top