“Victory” shoulder holster question

Register to hide this ad
I'm not feeling the love. I wouldn't select these WW2 replica holster for CC. OK if you are a seated pilot or in the limited space of a tank, but I imagine they would become uncomfortable quickly when moving about elsewhere.
 
Those aren't shoulder holsters as the term is commonly used. Closer to what people often call a hunters holster. Do some digging here and on US Militaria forum and you can find photos of the originals in use. Repros of course vary widely in how close they come to replicating the originals. I don't have experience with Sarco's but I suspect if a reverse image search may reveal who makes them and if they have any quirks.
 
Here's one
587196-d8f26d0f98f5fcf3919c1823c5af2331.data

posted by larryofcc here

There were more conventional shoulder holsters made for specific needs. Charlie Flick (user Ordnance guy?) is one of the knowledgeable collectors and researchers of all things Victory that posts here and on the USMilitaria forum. So you can search for his posts.
 
I’ve been thinking of getting one of These Model 10 shoulder holsters or the similar Aviator shoulder holsters. I’m curious as to how well they work under a button-down shirt and how the quality is.

Idea is to carry a 4” K frame semi-concealed.
I’ve been thinking of getting one of These Model 10 shoulder holsters or the similar Aviator shoulder holsters. I’m curious as to how well they work under a button-down shirt and how the quality is.

Idea is to carry a 4” K frame semi-concealed.
You wouldn’t like it.
Even the best shoulder holsters are problematic. Pain in the butt.
Get a good IWB holster and drape a handkerchief over it, or cover with shirt tail.
4” K frame is not the easiest gun to conceal. Can be done, though.
 
I have tried several shoulder holsters over the years, but keep going back to a good IWB holster.
 
I’ve been thinking of getting one of These Model 10 shoulder holsters or the similar Aviator shoulder holsters. I’m curious as to how well they work under a button-down shirt and how the quality is.

Idea is to carry a 4” K frame semi-concealed.



They work well in their intended role. For pilots who are seated the majority of the time, they work fine. For guys on a tractor, or something similar, they also work well. I guess you can sum it up with them working for seated work. Once you get out of that role, their limitations are already noted.
 
I have a re-pop from sarco. When looped on to a belt it's fairly stable. I use mine over a shirt when brambling around the dessert, fishing, hunting or hiking the wood up north. The shell loops are great for various outdoor loads. Snakeshot, cowboy loads for smallgame, 158 gr defensive loads, and a few hard-cast 38-44 spec loads.
 
I have a re-pop from sarco. When looped on to a belt it's fairly stable. I use mine over a shirt when brambling around the dessert, fishing, hunting or hiking the wood up north. The shell loops are great for various outdoor loads. Snakeshot, cowboy loads for smallgame, 158 gr defensive loads, and a few hard-cast 38-44 spec loads.
I ordered one yesterday, will give it a shot. If nothing else it’ll help populate the vintage-looking holster collection
 
I've carried my 13 (4" barrel K frame) in a vertical shoulder holster with the "spring type" retention", usually in cooler weather where I can employ a zip up hoodie or leather jacket, zipped about 1/3rd up, from time to time. It IS more suitable for use if your driving/seated, and is one of the few ways to carry a K frame actually concealed. Otherwise, if you can't practically open/hip carry, I would use an iwb holster with a compact or sub-compact. Fortunately, a lot of my Glock 30s holsters are quite handy at carrying a 639, too, so I keep those as a viable option. Older shoulder holsters that were designed for the S&W 15 would work, too, as a 4" K frame holster, but again, the need for a jacket is a factor.

I have what is also called a "tanker holster" for my 1911, which is the type I believe the OP was asking about,, but, due to a strap coming around the front and the holster being more towards 10:30 on your torso, these also would require a partially zipped jacket to conceal.....These were designed more to keep a sidearm from catching on hatches, etc. for tank and air crewmen, and in the case of the 1911, SOP was to carry it hammer down on an empty chamber in these holsters, rather than "hammer back, safety on, bullet in chamber". The idea was that it was for TRANSPORTING a sidearm, rather than concealing...If a pilot or tanker got in a situation where they actually had to USE their sidearm, (instead of the machine gun, for a tanker at least) they would already be out of vehicle, with their pistol drawn and a round chambered, not in a "quick draw" situation....
 
Back
Top