Holster for Governor, for running

686-380

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
832
Reaction score
703
I know it may seem cray-cray but I got to thinking during my jog today. I run a trail in the Utah Cache Forest. You just never know what you'll come across (or the other way around) while you're out there. I would love to find a way to comfortably carry my Governor, perhaps slung across my back.

Has any of you seen heard, created of something like that?
 
Register to hide this ad
I run with a Taurus model 85 (sorry, the Smith was too expensive and the 85 was only $175) in an OWB holster on my belt . I usually have my t-shirt over the top of the gun while I fast-walk a warmup lap, then tuck it behind the gun while I run to keep the sweat off the gun. OC is no big deal here, and I 've never heard anyone complain.

As for the hill people bag- NO thanks. First, I don't want to look like I'm out playing commando or airsoft, and second, every person I know that is a serious hiker (steep terrain for a LOT of miles) has tried a chest pack and used it only once or twice before tossing it. I need that space open to let cooling air in.
 
Thanks all. I'm taking everything into consideration, including the duct tape. I'm concerned about sweat, bouncing and keeping the weapon secure. If I do decide on any of these options, I'll post the result.
 
Mainsail - If I've learned one thing working dead cow it is this : there is no one size fits all approach to holstering a handgun. This is evidently a market phenomenon given the amount of styles, materials, and applications available to customers today when shopping for different carry methods. I prefer a traditional approach anywhere it is appropriate but that shoe doesn't fit all.

The highest elevation point in the state of Mississippi 807' so it is not a large concern in my neck of the woods but I can understand how it is in yours. Where a belt holster becomes less than desirable is when wearing something like a pack where the waist strap covers up your gun. If it goes into the pack it's not easy to gain access too so some form of chest mount is necessary, or a thigh rig which would probably qualify under your commando sentiment. Something like this chest rig from Clark Fork might be a compromise.

Chest Holster | Clark Fork Leather

Everything with carry is a compromise be that look, accessibility, or comfort. I'd rather the OP have it on him in a time of need than worry about how it looks. I have some local friends that 'trail run' with a small backpack that includes a bladder and a hill people pack for their firearm. It works for them even in our summer heat/humidity so it is plausible.

I can't think of any other form of carry that leaves the gun at hand, without having enough movement to have it move a lot when jogging. The thought of holster chafe is a painful one!

Just thoughts from a cow bender - as always your mileage may vary.
 
Last edited:
I jog with the minimum equipment, not even glasses. We're at the 6500 - 7500 ft elevation. I'm an old fat white guy (OFWG) that isn't concerned in the slightest how I look. Staying cool is another huge factor.

I'm thinking that I probably won't need "instant" access but wold like to be able to have the gun in hand within 15 seconds. This OFWG sweats prodigiously, so I don't know if leather would hold up. That's one reason why duct tape may come in handy.
 
Where a belt holster becomes less than desirable is when wearing something like a pack where the waist strap covers up your gun.
Agree. You don't want anything under the pack belt or it'll create hot-spots that you'll not soon forget. A leather gun belt can also seriously pinch when some skin gets between it and the backpack belt (a properly fitted pack rides higher than a pants belt) and that hurts like heck. Most hiking pants don't even have belt loops for that very reason. For hiking and backpacking I use a Bianchi M12 military holster on my pack belt. The QD buckles on packs won't allow you to thread a traditional holster onto the belt, but the M12 can be attached over the belt- Bianchi calls it quick-lock or something.
If it goes into the pack it's not easy to gain access
Agree. I have an anecdote about that subject but it's too long for this post. In the pack = bad.
...so some form of chest mount is necessary...
Disagree; there are other options, like the M12 (for hiking, not running).
or a thigh rig which would probably qualify under your commando sentiment.
Agree, but not only for the commando reason. A thigh rig requires a belt under the pack belt- creates hot-spots as mentioned above, and the rig will create drag on your leg especially when you're going up steep terrain.

EDIT to add: My other objection to the hill people chest rig is that during the draw, at the most critical moment (when your hand is acquiring the gun) the gun is lined up with your off-side arm (the one that's unzipping the bag). They used to have a warning about that on their website, and suggesting your keep that arm in a pronounced elbow-high contortion to keep it clear. I don't feel confident I would remember to do that during a physical attack (man or beast).
Something like this chest rig from Clark Fork might be a compromise.
Agree in part. It might be a compromise, but I had a chest rig for my Ruger Alaskan and the thing would thump my chest with every step- not painful but more like the Chinese water torture. I don't want to think about running in that rig.

BTW, I can't get to the link as the DoD seems to think that's adult material. :rolleyes:
Everything with carry is a compromise be that look, accessibility, or comfort.
Agree. I'm just offering other outside the box ideas. The little .38 on my belt in a regular leather holster is completely accessible and comfortable, so I recommend that.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top