Galco Combat Master

Joined
May 16, 2005
Messages
15,427
Reaction score
37,517
I recently bought a 4" Ruger GP100. Didn't want to spend the bucks and time on a custom holster, and having read some "good bang-for-the-buck" comments here, decided to try Galco.

I liked the look of their pancake-style Combat Master. On their website they go for $130 or so, but are heavily discounted by online distributers. I paid $78 and postage.

When it arrived I was intrigued to see on the packaging that the holster is designed to fit a number of models:



That had not occurred to me. Made me a bit worried about the fit.

I first tried it on my GP100. As suggested, stuck it in a plastic bag and pushed it into the holster. Not that difficult. I pulled it out after 15 minutes or so, removed the bag, checked the Ruger's fit. Nice and tight, but not overly. Stayed in when I experimentally turned it upside down and shook it,

I then stuck in my Colt Three Fifty-Seven and found that it is quite a good fit, too. The gun stays in the holster while upside down, though not if I shake it. (Unsurprising, as I have stretched it a tad for the GP100.) I'd be okay with carrying the Colt in it.





I've only worn it inside a bit so far, but it seems comfortable and holds the gun in high and tight under the ribs.

The leather is about as stiff and thin as my Mitch Rosen holsters. Stitching seems cleanly executed and robust to my untrained eye.

I think for the price it is an excellent buy. Better than I expected.
 
Register to hide this ad
I've been a fan of the Combat Master for a while now.

Years ago I found this nice-looking leather pancake holster at a gun shop in Seattle. The tag said it was for a J-frame, and it was 30 bucks, so I bought it. It was the Galco Combat Master. I noticed that my gun didn't fit it perfectly, so I looked up the number, and it turned out it was for a Colt DS.

A couple of years later I traded into a really nice 3rd issue Colt DS, and this combo was my EDC for a long time. It really made me a fan of the Combat Master, of which I now have several.
 

Attachments

  • _DSC0090.jpg
    _DSC0090.jpg
    44.9 KB · Views: 58
Galco holster leather is of a very high quality and a good fit considering most of their holsters are for multiple models. I owned two for my 686 and they were both more than serviceable. While they are no longer my go to, I think you will enjoy this one, I know I really liked my Galco Fletch.
 
I recently bought a 4" Ruger GP100. Didn't want to spend the bucks and time on a custom holster, and having read some "good bang-for-the-buck" comments here, decided to try Galco.

I liked the look of their pancake-style Combat Master. On their website they go for $130 or so, but are heavily discounted by online distributers. I paid $78 and postage.

When it arrived I was intrigued to see on the packaging that the holster is designed to fit a number of models:



That had not occurred to me. Made me a bit worried about the fit.

I first tried it on my GP100. As suggested, stuck it in a plastic bag and pushed it into the holster. Not that difficult. I pulled it out after 15 minutes or so, removed the bag, checked the Ruger's fit. Nice and tight, but not overly. Stayed in when I experimentally turned it upside down and shook it,

I then stuck in my Colt Three Fifty-Seven and found that it is quite a good fit, too. The gun stays in the holster while upside down, though not if I shake it. (Unsurprising, as I have stretched it a tad for the GP100.) I'd be okay with carrying the Colt in it.





I've only worn it inside a bit so far, but it seems comfortable and holds the gun in high and tight under the ribs.

The leather is about as stiff and thin as my Mitch Rosen holsters. Stitching seems cleanly executed and robust to my untrained eye.

I think for the price it is an excellent buy. Better than I expected.

Galco is one of only four gunleather makers I endorse (free) today. Nevertheless the OP's example rides higher than optimal and Galco should've known better. The cylinder, when coplanar with the belt, will carry any revolver from short to long barrel, from small to large frame, at the ideal balance. Does away with the 'get a good gunbelt' which notion is DERIVED from the top-heavy holsters of the Seventies. We know better now.
 
Well, better than we knew in 2015, anyway!;)

...This particular holster [Combat Master] by Galco, anyway, is an example of good design, which I believe is the OPs [guy carryng an N-frame concealed] excellent point...

Post 52 herein: Finally...A Way To Carry a 4" N Frame Concealed!

An advantage of the high ride, for me, is that I'm using it with a 4" revolver so it conceals better than it would if the cylinder rested on the belt. (Plus, I like a good stiff belt! Set 'em up!)
 
I'm old and my shoulders do not care for a high ride, but ... not a big deal.

As far as the multiple models, the Dan Wesson and L frame Smiths are really really close in size to a Python, so the same holster being made for all of them should not cause you any concern. I am not familiar enough with the Rugers to comment on that fit issue.
 
I bought one new in package here on the forum for 2.5 inch 66. I didn’t know it was more of a high ride but it’s comfy and growing on me. The thumb snap was hard to refasten - I had to put a couple of those little felt self stick dots on the back of the snap to give it some resistance to be able to resnap one handed. Would obviously work better with a target hammer but not my thing.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0635.jpg
    IMG_0635.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_0636.jpg
    IMG_0636.jpg
    80.5 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_0473.jpg
    IMG_0473.jpg
    82.9 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_0472.jpg
    IMG_0472.jpg
    78.6 KB · Views: 23
Galco is one of only four gunleather makers I endorse (free) today. Nevertheless the OP's example rides higher than optimal and Galco should've known better. The cylinder, when coplanar with the belt, will carry any revolver from short to long barrel, from small to large frame, at the ideal balance. Does away with the 'get a good gunbelt' which notion is DERIVED from the top-heavy holsters of the Seventies. We know better now.

RED, Speaking with some experience, I contend that the "ideal balance" may be different for different people because our bodies are all different. I like the location of the cylinder on the Galco CM because it works well for me.
 
Back
Top