Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > The Lounge

The Lounge A Catch-All Area for NON-GUN topics.
PUT GUN TOPICS in the GUN FORUMS.
Keep it Family Friendly. See The Rules for Banned Topics!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2010, 11:30 PM
jframe's Avatar
jframe jframe is offline
Member
sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 1,905
Liked 1,156 Times in 307 Posts
Default sp101 vs. 640-1

I have a chance to acquire an SP101 on a trade deal. I've owned a 640-1 before and even pocket carried it comfortably. I understand that the Ruger is really too big for that, but how does it really compare to the 640? I'd like to hear pros and cons on this if anyone has a comment. I kinda like these chunky blasters, and hate to pass on this one, if the other party will commit to the trade. All thoughts are appreciated.
__________________
MARK
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 08-02-2010, 06:58 AM
ColbyBruce ColbyBruce is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 3,846
Liked 11,823 Times in 3,686 Posts
Default

The Ruger SP101 is built like a tank, and weighs accordingly. I would rather own and carry a 3", HB, RB, K frame.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:11 AM
7shooter 7shooter is offline
Member
sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In the Cloud
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 2,252
Liked 1,872 Times in 582 Posts
Default

I have both revolvers. The SP101 is too heavy for pocket carry. The Ruger wrap around grip makes for better felt recoil than the 640. My Ruger also has a significantly better trigger than the 640. The 640 is thinner and easier to conceal. While the trigger is heavy I don't really see that as a problem for the close range use the gun is likely to be used for. They are both excellent well made reliable guns. I don't think you can go wrong with either.
__________________
I like Ike.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:14 AM
JcMack's Avatar
JcMack JcMack is offline
Member
sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Deepest, darkest, Indiana
Posts: 6,210
Likes: 3,420
Liked 6,239 Times in 1,908 Posts
Default

I've had couple SP101's. I had both the standard and bobbed hammer in the 2". Also a .327 3". If you wear baggy pants you could probably pocket carry it. For me the SP101 is a holster gun. I'd rather have a RB Security/ Speed six without adj. sights. Not much bigger than an sp101.
__________________
SOS USA
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:15 AM
snowman snowman is offline
Member
sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rural NW Ohio
Posts: 3,387
Likes: 5,180
Liked 2,444 Times in 1,097 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jframe View Post
I have a chance to acquire an SP101 on a trade deal. I've owned a 640-1 before and even pocket carried it comfortably. I understand that the Ruger is really too big for that, but how does it really compare to the 640? I'd like to hear pros and cons on this if anyone has a comment. I kinda like these chunky blasters, and hate to pass on this one, if the other party will commit to the trade. All thoughts are appreciated.

jframe: I can't give you a comparison, since I haven't owned a 640; but I can tell you that I pocket carry my SP101 regularly. It isn't too big, as long as your pants have reasonably deep pockets. The weight is a problem only if one likes a loosely-fitting belt(which, granted, can be more comfortable).

When I was looking for a carry piece six years or so ago I didn't feel I could spend the extra $150 or so the Smith Js were bringing, so I obtained the Ruger from a member here. I'm very satisfied with it, especially the stock grip. I don't like round butt grips, and the Ruger is square. Also it is rubber in the front and back for a positive grip and cushioned recoil, but plastic on the sides to help it slide in and out of the pocket a little more easily.

Andy

Last edited by snowman; 08-02-2010 at 07:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-2010, 10:27 AM
CAJUNLAWYER's Avatar
CAJUNLAWYER CAJUNLAWYER is offline
Member
sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On da Bayou Teche
Posts: 18,537
Likes: 18,777
Liked 59,413 Times in 9,742 Posts
Default

I think the SP101 is one of the finest revolvers made. Mine will be one of the last I let go. I keep it in the suburban. The penultimate truck gun.
__________________
Forum consigliere
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-02-2010, 10:30 AM
Rule3's Avatar
Rule3 Rule3 is offline
Member
sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,113
Likes: 10,843
Liked 15,567 Times in 6,824 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7shooter View Post
I have both revolvers. The SP101 is too heavy for pocket carry. The Ruger wrap around grip makes for better felt recoil than the 640. My Ruger also has a significantly better trigger than the 640. The 640 is thinner and easier to conceal. While the trigger is heavy I don't really see that as a problem for the close range use the gun is likely to be used for. They are both excellent well made reliable guns. I don't think you can go wrong with either.

Can't add anymore than this. Pretty much says it all.
Oh ya, +1
__________________
Still Running Against the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-02-2010, 10:31 AM
jimmyj's Avatar
jimmyj jimmyj is online now
Member
sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1 sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1,694
Liked 16,416 Times in 4,273 Posts
Default

When given a choice - GO SMITH and WESSON!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-03-2010, 11:36 AM
ChinaSeaSailor's Avatar
ChinaSeaSailor ChinaSeaSailor is offline
US Veteran
sp101 vs. 640-1  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

had both - fired both - either one you clould not wear out in your lifetime
__________________
Fair winds and following sea
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
327, 640, k frame, round butt, ruger, sig arms, smith and wesson


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New SP101 in .327 Fed bobf Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 10 04-03-2015 05:13 PM
SP101 in .22 CAJUNLAWYER Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 10 03-10-2015 11:01 AM
SP101 or S&W 60-9 lilop Concealed Carry & Self Defense 27 10-25-2012 10:57 AM
S&W M&P 45c (SPF) SP101 (SPF) imjin138 GUNS - For Sale or Trade 3 04-25-2011 04:24 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)