I don't understand the objections of so many gun enthusiast of wanting to put decent sights on a handgun. A slingshot? yeah. A pipebomb? yeah. Maybe even a stick gun in a prison. But not a good quality handgun. Maybe Farmer17 is like me and really likes good sights on any firearm he has. There may just be a time when he wants to or really needs to actually hit something futher than 5 feet away with an LCP, and that's all he has! He probably will have left his 80 caliber magnum revolver with a 14.5 inch barrell with Nikon 500 dollar scope that everyone else keeps in their pants pocket at home.

It has a 2 3/4" barrell folks. There are people here and many other places that want good sights on their Smiths's with shorter barrels than this.
If 5 or 10 feet is all this and other 380's are good for, why not pass a law to forbid such a useless round? Lets get rid of the 32's also, and the 25's and 22's.
I apologize for being so antagonistic about this, but everytime I see someone post about putting decent sights on a small frame handgun, it's always "put it in their belly and pull the trigger!" type of response they get. I hope to God I never have to "put it in their belly and pull the trigger", with my LCP, but I have had to use it for feral cats and groundhogs when I had absolutely nothing other than a rock to throw, and I would have greatly appreciated a good sight on my Ruger.
Try "putting it in their belly and pulling the trigger" for one of those critters!
Yeah, I could carry a bigger/better gun. Been there and done that. Too freaking old to carry a hogleg around all day anymore.
Let's see if anyone can really come up with some ideals to help Farmer17. I know I would like to have a choice for my LCP, but until Ruger sees fit to put something actually usable on them, we're stuck with other ideals.
Thanks for letting me rant!
C.