|
 |

04-17-2020, 09:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 261
Likes: 273
Liked 120 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
Firearms trusts. Necessary? Not Necessary?
Hello Everyone. I just read an article on Firearms trusts in American Handgunner May/June 2020. He made some good points but I want to hear some other opinions. What do you think? Do you have one? What are the advantages/disadvantages? Are they necessary? Thank you for your input? Ray
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-17-2020, 09:13 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 1,928
Liked 4,444 Times in 1,365 Posts
|
|
Lots of factors involved. You need a lawyer.
Depends on what state you're in, marital status, income, your wants and other things.
Did I mention you need a lawyer?
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|

04-17-2020, 10:51 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MN (East California)
Posts: 5,629
Likes: 1,751
Liked 7,295 Times in 2,781 Posts
|
|
What problem is it supposed to solve?
__________________
Common sense isn't so common.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

04-17-2020, 10:57 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 15,735
Liked 5,254 Times in 1,622 Posts
|
|
I only lend guns to friends I trust.
Not just any guy's because they might not return it.
Why chance it?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-17-2020, 11:11 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 7,835
Liked 36,378 Times in 3,893 Posts
|
|
I have a gun trust that was mainly for my suppressors. This way the NFA stamps are in the name of the trust and therefore my suppressors are transferable to either or both of my sons who are listed in the trust. I’ve not listed any firearms in the trust yet, mainly because I see no legal advantage in doing so.
__________________
- Change it back -
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
Bro. Dave, Ivan the Butcher, jack the toad, ladder13, llowry61, old bear, Onomea, pawngal, Puller, rwsmith, sigp220.45, Steve912 |

04-18-2020, 12:28 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Near Gettysburg
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 67,657
Liked 24,675 Times in 7,916 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hittman77
Lots of factors involved. You need a lawyer.
Depends on what state you're in, marital status, income, your wants and other things.
Did I mention you need a lawyer?
|
Not only get a lawyer, but get a lawyer who has experience in firearms law. It is getting to be a specialty that not every lawyer deals in. My honorary nephew (I'm a friend of the family) has developed a practice in firearms law, which pretty much occupies his time, and gun trusts are part of his practice. Paying more up front for help from an attorney experienced in these matters is a lot cheaper than trying to deal with BATFE later.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|

04-18-2020, 04:46 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 32,067
Likes: 43,345
Liked 30,651 Times in 14,419 Posts
|
|
If it is not necessary NOW.....
...it may be necessary LATER! I think it would be a good idea to get under the wire before they make some crummy law and you'll be 'grandfathered in', unless they make even more crummy laws.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|

04-18-2020, 07:02 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SE Wisc.
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 810
Liked 6,861 Times in 2,149 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by johngalt
What problem is it supposed to solve?
|
In the world of machine guns, the signature of the chief a law enforcement official was needed on the BATF forms for the acquisition of a machine gun. In many locations, the chief a law enforcement official would NOT sign the forms and without the signature, the forms couldn't be submitted the BATF. The Trust was a way to circumvent the requirement of the signature of the chief a law enforcement official. Since the Trust and not an individual was obtaining the machine gun, the signature of the chief a law enforcement official was not required. Recently the rules concerning the BATF transfer of machine guns have changed and the signature of the chief a law enforcement official is no longer required. The process of obtaining machine gun via a trust is now a moot point.
__________________
Bill
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

04-18-2020, 08:28 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 4,172
Liked 2,330 Times in 1,194 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBoy99
In the world of machine guns, the signature of the chief a law enforcement official was needed on the BATF forms for the acquisition of a machine gun. In many locations, the chief a law enforcement official would NOT sign the forms and without the signature, the forms couldn't be submitted the BATF. The Trust was a way to circumvent the requirement of the signature of the chief a law enforcement official.
|
Sounds like a CNN/MSNBC explanation.
Having ownership in trust eases transfers within the trust.
See Faulkner's post.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-18-2020, 08:42 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 32,786
Likes: 67,136
Liked 58,820 Times in 18,305 Posts
|
|
I SBR’d an AR lower and did Individual. With it are instructions for my wife on how to change it back to a non registered AR lower when I go home.
__________________
I’m your Boogie Man, uh huh.
|

04-18-2020, 09:29 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern NY-AdirondackMts
Posts: 8,972
Likes: 14,902
Liked 15,313 Times in 5,820 Posts
|
|
Years back I looked into seeing about a Firearms trust.
Asked a general attorney( a shooter) I knew to recommend me a specialty lawyer that did that kind of work. As I live in the peoples republic of NY, at least I gave him a good laugh.
__________________
14 S&W Revs none with locks!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-18-2020, 10:53 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 7,246
Liked 15,060 Times in 3,468 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladder13
I SBR’d an AR lower and did Individual. With it are instructions for my wife on how to change it back to a non registered AR lower when I go home.
|
Tell your wife to file a tax exempt form 5, and she can keep any class 3 stuff you have. She doesn't have to change anything.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-18-2020, 11:30 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 3,376
Liked 5,080 Times in 1,990 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wood714
Tell your wife to file a tax exempt form 5, and she can keep any class 3 stuff you have. She doesn't have to change anything.
|
Yes, and my understanding is the NFA items will transfer tax exempt as long as they can assume ownership legally (no felonies, etc)???
ETA:
After re-reading your post, I see where you already mentioned "tax exempt". Oops...
Last edited by jack the toad; 04-18-2020 at 11:33 AM.
|

04-18-2020, 12:13 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 7,246
Liked 15,060 Times in 3,468 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack the toad
Yes, and my understanding is the NFA items will transfer tax exempt as long as they can assume ownership legally (no felonies, etc)???
ETA:
After re-reading your post, I see where you already mentioned "tax exempt". Oops...
|
This is true.
I was kicking myself for not setting up a trust.
Told my daughter to put long barrels on my 2 SBR AR's and to destroy my silencer before turning it in, but leave the serial number intact.
Then I found out about the form 5 on the Silencer Talk forum.
All my guns are willed to her, so all she needs is the form 5 and a death certificate.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-18-2020, 03:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 261
Likes: 273
Liked 120 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
I dont have any NFA items
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faulkner
I have a gun trust that was mainly for my suppressors. This way the NFA stamps are in the name of the trust and therefore my suppressors are transferable to either or both of my sons who are listed in the trust. I’ve not listed any firearms in the trust yet, mainly because I see no legal advantage in doing so.
|
I dont have any NFA items, so I never thought a gun trust would be necessary. I have a few guns but nothing in the way of an NFA item. Would a gun trust be necessary?
|

04-18-2020, 03:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 261
Likes: 273
Liked 120 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
what would BATFE get involved in
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golddollar
Not only get a lawyer, but get a lawyer who has experience in firearms law. It is getting to be a specialty that not every lawyer deals in. My honorary nephew (I'm a friend of the family) has developed a practice in firearms law, which pretty much occupies his time, and gun trusts are part of his practice. Paying more up front for help from an attorney experienced in these matters is a lot cheaper than trying to deal with BATFE later.
|
Since I dont have any suppressors or fully auto guns or any class III items, would BATFE become involved?
|

04-18-2020, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 7,835
Liked 36,378 Times in 3,893 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pasote
I dont have any NFA items, so I never thought a gun trust would be necessary. I have a few guns but nothing in the way of an NFA item. Would a gun trust be necessary?
|
No. Not until you have a gun collection of significant value would I consider a gun trust.
__________________
- Change it back -
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|