Spotting Scope

Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
11,743
Reaction score
18,074
Location
DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
My old 30-90x90 spotting scope inside double prism broke.
This model is no longer made.

What power scope should I be looking for a replacement ?

I need to see .30 caliber holes at 100 yards
 
Register to hide this ad
I've had a Leupold 30x60 that's worked well for the last couple decades....Check out jarheadtop.com , Jim Owens site...He has Kowa scopes and lots of good info on the site.
 
You need probably at least 20X or more. (f your retired eye's are like mine). I have an old 15-45X Redfield that I have had for over 30+ years, and it is beginning to get a little "foggy", but I don't have too much need for one any longer so I get by.
 
Until I get some laser work on my right eye, a spotting scope at 25 yards don't work. :-(

Have a appointment tomorrow to have it done.

Have a blessed day,

Leon
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rpg
My old 30-90x90 spotting scope inside double prism broke.
This model is no longer made.

What power scope should I be looking for a replacement ?

I need to see .30 caliber holes at 100 yards

I've been debating whether to get a spotting scope myself, and if so which one.

Are you shooting with iron sights? Using the splatterburst style targets I can see .223 holes at 200 yds using 16x on my Nitro riflescope. I want to try some 300 yd shots and I can't see those, which is why I'm wondering if a spotting scope would work.

I was using a cheaper 3-9x scope and even with it I could see .22 holes at 100 yds, but not beyond. I thought I needed more magnification so I bought the Nitro which is 6-24x but it's not clear enough at levels above 16x. It did extend my range to 200 yds though.

In discussions about this on various boards the consensus seems to me that magnification isn't so much the issue, it's more about clarity. I've been told that for the 300 yd range a suitable scope will start at 4 figures so that's not happening in my world.

I've seen several spotting scopes in the $100-$200 range with magnifications of 60x and I really wonder if they would be clear enough to serve my purpose. I hate to spend the money and then find out they can't do the job.

Have you ever tried the splatterburst style targets? At 100 yds they might be all you need with even modest magnification. I just bought 100 of them for $40 so compared to the cost of ammo these days they are very inexpensive.
 
I have a Celestron Ultima 80. It's a good scope for the price but you need a good base because it is heavy. I would suggest a 60 mm scope for short range use. I understand Konus is a good scope
 
Closest I have is a Docter Optik 15X60 binocular mainly used for astronomy. It spots distant animals and the sharpness and brightness work better than some may think at the range.

You need top quality and ample objective lens diameter for high power scopes. No way would I buy a cheap, powerful scope.

If your binocular is high quality, even 8-10 power will work better than most think if you have good eyes and a rest. If you have cataracts, get 'em off! Makes a vast difference.

My cheapest glass is a Bushnell 10X30 monocular owned since 1980. I got an optical engineer at a defense plant to test it. He said it will very nearly show an intimate area of female anatomy clearly at 100 yards. That means it will probably define spots of less than one inch diameter.

Bausch & Lomb used to brag that their basic 7X35 Porro binocular will define an apple on a tree at one mile. I proved that, and Zeiss, Leica, Swarovski and other brands will, too. In a couple of cases, I cheated, using Bois d' Arc apples, but they're green, harder to see. The Euro glasses are 8 or 10 power. The Docter 15X60 makes the task even easier, of course.
 
Last edited:
Mine is a GYAH 77mm with a angled 20x60 eyepiece. I can see 338 holes at 1000 on a bright day. @ 200 we could call which wing of the fly we hit!

Good clear brand, not at all expensive, but the set up for 1/4" camera tripod is too flimsy for the weight and broke, I put it in a real spotting scope saddle mount (Free Lands) and have much better stability and the mount adjustments are super precise at long range! I have two stands, one is the traditional 2 legged version and the other is for clamping to the shooting bench.

After 15 years, I would buy the same setup if the price was comparable to Celestron or lower like back then.

Ivan
 
I have a 25X Montgomery Wards spotting scope, over 50 years old, but it was made by Unertl. No problem seeing even .22 bullet holes at 100 yards.
 
Believe it or not Vortex builds a great spotting scope for the money. If you keep your eye on Midway a couple of times a year they come up with a special ($200), they are 20x60 and will give you enough detail at 100 yards to spot .22 ragged holes touching the line. I needed to move up to a scope with better resolution at 200yds, gave the Vortex to my son and shelled out the money for a Kowa 20 x 60...night and day resolution. Bear Mountain...
 
Vortex dominates the line during sight in days here in Billings, with good reason. The cost vs. performance is outstanding.

Another manufacturer that is a great performer for the money is the Konus 20x6-x80 angled eye piece scope.

Either of these will do all that you are asking it to do and then some.

Randy

PS. When I shot NRA Service Rifle matches the Kowa TSN-1 with a 25x Long Eye Relief eyepiece dominated that game.
 
Last edited:
A few ago I was standing on the Lookout Deck down at the Bosque del Apache Wildlife Refuge.
And it was getting dark!
A group of Bird Watching Ladies had a Swarovski Spotting Scope.
And they were reading the tag numbers on Cranes and the Ranger was writing them on a clipboard.
I guess they could see the skepticism on my face even in the dark, and offered me a look.
***! I could read a pretty small Tag Number about 50 yards away and it was getting dark!
That's a great Scope!
 
I got this Redfield Rampage 20-60X several months ago and have been very please with it and my 6.5 holes can be seen at 200 yards. I like this scope much better than the Leupold Sequoia I use to have and I really like the "leave on" cover that comes with it. If you don't at least spend a couple of hundred bucks on a spotting scope I'm not sure you'll be happy with it.


[ame="https://www.amazon.com/Redfield-20-60x60mm-Straight-Eyepiece-Spotting/dp/B0033C5EJE"]Amazon.com : Redfield Rampage 20-60x60mm Straight Eyepiece Spotting Scope : Sports & Outdoors[/ame]
 
Last edited:
Until I get some laser work on my right eye, a spotting scope at 25 yards don't work. :-(

Have a appointment tomorrow to have it done.

Have a blessed day,

Leon

Be sure to let us know how it goes for you.

I had both eyes done 10 years ago: best thing available in modern medicine! You'll love it.
 
Not to steal the thread but I thought you might like to see my "Universally Adjustable" scope mount. Instantly holds into any position without clamps or locks. I made it with less than $5 of materials. Ball was free as the local bowling alley was going to throw the ball away because it has a crack. I drilled the thumb hole larger and epoxied in place an aluminium adaptor I made on which to mount the scope. The base is a short section of 6" diameter aluminium tubing. I could have just as easily used a short section of PVC pipe.
 

Attachments

  • PICT10072.jpg
    PICT10072.jpg
    105.4 KB · Views: 13
  • PICT10073.jpg
    PICT10073.jpg
    116.1 KB · Views: 12
  • PICT10074.jpg
    PICT10074.jpg
    120.1 KB · Views: 9
  • PICT10075.jpg
    PICT10075.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 10
jimmyj,
What brand of scope was it? Some of the manufacturers offer excellent warranties and others offer reasonable repair service. It's worth looking into before you buy another scope.
 
Back
Top