Idiot with drone damages water bomber

LVSteve

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
22,401
Reaction score
33,852
Location
Lost Wages, NV
Register to hide this ad
I'm sure restrictions are coming.....

....but writing the law is going to be a real bear. People were saying, "Why are drivers on the Golden Gate Bridge concerned about running into drones?" Would you want to hit a three pound drone with your windshield going 55 mph?

Anyway, drones need to be controlled like ham and CB radio transmitters USED to be. There was licensing and if somebody was out of compliance they would be contacted by the FCC. But nowadays people can do whatever they want, even if it endangers other people, and nobody monitors anything.

Just as an aside, there was a guy in a neighborhood that had this immense linear amplifier on his radio transmitter and whenever he would send, everybody's TVs would snow out. He avoided trouble by giving out filters that stopped the problem, but I'll bet there were people that didn't know what was causing the problem. But that was about the time they quit enforcing the rules.
 
Last edited:
The current laws in California foster a no penalty, rules don't apply to me mentality. The current catch and release actions of our courts for many, many crimes also don't help.

Hopefully, the pendulum is swinging back
These drone flyers need to be caught, charged and sent to federal prison for a few years.
Not just as punishment for their dangerous actions but as an example to other like minded fools.
 
....but writing the law is going to be a real bear. People were saying, "Why are drivers on the Golden Gate Bridge concerned about running into drones?" Would you want to hit a three pound drone with your windshield going 55 mph?

Anyway, drones need to be controlled like ham and CB radio transmitters USED to be. There was licensing and if somebody was out of compliance they would be contacted by the FCC. But nowadays people can do whatever they want, even if it endangers other people, and nobody monitors anything.

Just as an aside, there was a guy in a neighborhood that had this immense linear amplifier on his radio transmitter and whenever he would send, everybody's TVs would snow out. He avoided trouble by giving out filters that stopped the problem, but I'll bet there were people that didn't know what was causing the problem. But that was about the time they quit enforcing the rules.

the restrictions are already here and enacted.
the drone operator is to have a transponder on his craft, traceable to him any time he is operating outside a designated FRIA.
Inside or outside a designated FRIA, operators are limited to 400 feet AGL and clear of all aircraft.
All drones above .55 Lbs must have an FAA registration number.
The FCC side of the problem is also regulated.
I have some FPV gear that requires me to have a ham ticket to operate. these TX's are still under a single watt.
I'd say 15% or less operate FPV in compliance (live video feed system) Despite this, they cause more problems for each other at drone race events than they do anyone else. I've never heard of interference outside said events.
the control side is no longer the old single freq like ham or cb,. It's spread spectrum hopping all over the entire allocated band, avoiding interference
in the days of 72 mhz, frequency conflict was common and only a handful of pilots could operate at any given time.
today FliteTest hosts FliteFest where literally hundreds of pilots operate all manor of flying contraption at the same time with FCC compliant equipment.
 
Generally the Feds control and restrict Air Space.
According to the article, restrictions were in place.
‘The drone was flying despite a Temporary Flight Restriction TFR imposed by the FAA over the area from Jan. 9 to Jan. 23 to prevent any aircraft, manned or drone, from interfering with firefighting efforts. The drone was being flown by a photographer taking video of the flames, the LA Times reported.’
Here a Sister Ship a few years ago here in NM.
 

Attachments

  • A8FFC3FE-84D5-4461-A32C-1C2C8FBE8CE2.jpeg
    A8FFC3FE-84D5-4461-A32C-1C2C8FBE8CE2.jpeg
    67.4 KB · Views: 35
The fires are making for incredible stories fraught with irony and this drone interference is in keeping with the general theme. This is a cluster flop of virtually unprecedented proportions characterizing the perfect alignment of style over substance, appearances over reality, and just plain poor risk management.

One wonders, once the smoke clears, if the citizens of this area will feel differently about holding leadership accountable. Some are pretty vocal right now but we'll see in a year or two. What a tragedy made all the more profound because much of it was preventable.
 
The prices paid and the "fame" created probably pushed this person and others to justify their actions. We all watch with enthusiasm at the pictures and video when broadcast, yet have no idea how the news got them.

I agree that the punishment should be strong enough to be a deterrent, but wonder if that just increases the prices paid, resulting in more violations as they assess the risk vs reward.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top