Top Shot on the History Channel...ugh...

conn ak

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Messages
819
Reaction score
8
Saw this show for the first time yesterday. Am I the only one thinks this show blows? How can you screw up a great mixture of guns and competition? The cast is, of course, politically correct and carefully chosen to have someone to root for whether you're a cowboy, African-American, strong, silent military, a woman, an older guy, a young, overly confident whippersnapper, an ex-cop, ...etc.... The show's host is a powerful, macho guy who can't speak without putting his hands on his hips. God, please..... I shoot with guys at the range who can smoke some of these contestants with certain disciplines of shooting. This show is like the crab fisherman show. Like a comedian I heard on the radio, "After the second season of Deadliest Catch, I was rooting for the crabs." A great idea by the History Channel, it's too bad it's really just another "reality" show where you get thrown off the island. Let's hope there's no shootouts in the clubhouse before the end of the season.
 
Register to hide this ad
Hi:
I do not watch the show on a regular basis. The one I had a question about was the "Hot Shot" military guy who couldn't hit the target at 100 yards with a Springfield Model 1903. His partner did at 50 yards.
Mr. "Hot Shot"'s excuse was the Springfield's rear sight was loose.
In my lifetime I have used Model 1903s a "Bunch" and have never used one or ever heard of one with a "loose rear sight". These weapons are checked prior to using them on the show.
Probably Mr. "Hot Shot" forgot that the Springfields battle sights are set for 525 yards. At 100 yards using the battle sights and a "Six O'clock" sight picture, the bullets are going over the target.
 
I saw on one advertisement for the show that one of them told the other "You have to cock it every time" on a single action army clone, and another one said he felt "uncomfortable" with it.

Are you kidding me??!?!?! :mad::eek::confused:
Not only that, but if the show has any budget at all, why not let them use a real Colt 3rd generation too- not some knock off.

Imagine what would happen if you handed them a Schofield clone or a Webley! :p
 
DVR is the greatest invention since television. I record the show,
fast forward through commercials and the b..s... twenty five minutes on with my life.
 
Is that the show with the Red team vs the Blue team?.. Where the two teams face each other in a competition and the losing team picks two members to have a face off.... the loser of that face off goes home?
 
top b.s

last Sundays show had a contestant trying to set up a deal , if the team lost ,his coalition of 4 would pick the 2 best shooters , not his group , to compete against each other and get rid of 1 of them. To my joy one of the coalition went to the 2 best shots and explained what was happening.The major conspirator then kept proclaiming that the person that exposed his plan was a RAT and mouthed off as to how the RAT should be gotten rid of . In my way of thinking he is the one at fault for trying to get rid of good shooters on his team possibly so he has a better chance of winning.
This is just another reality show not a shooting show
 
Saying "Top Shot" is all BS, is like complaining WWE is fake. Of course it is! But it's kinda fun.

Ah c'mon, you didn't think the road runner & coyote were real did you?
 
I was too lazy to check, but I suspect this subject has been discussed here before. Regardless, I would register my vote in favor of the show, regardless of the many controversies it may provoke among us gun-loving viewers. Most important, in my opinion, is that the show tends to promote an acceptance of shooting sports among the general public. People would be bored to death if they had to watch contestants shooting holes in paper, or if the contestants were ordinary shooters who got along well with most other shooters. So the producers dreamed up some gimmicks that, while annoying to some of us, can appeal to the limited attention span of the general public and maybe even convince some viewers that shooting sports are not bad and may actually be worth trying.
 
I was too lazy to check, but I suspect this subject has been discussed here before. Regardless, I would register my vote in favor of the show, regardless of the many controversies it may provoke among us gun-loving viewers. Most important, in my opinion, is that the show tends to promote an acceptance of shooting sports among the general public. People would be bored to death if they had to watch contestants shooting holes in paper, or if the contestants were ordinary shooters who got along well with most other shooters. So the producers dreamed up some gimmicks that, while annoying to some of us, can appeal to the limited attention span of the general public and maybe even convince some viewers that shooting sports are not bad and may actually be worth trying.

I concur. I enjoy the show, and look forward to each week's episode.
 
Hot Shot

Hi:
I do not watch the show on a regular basis. The one I had a question about was the "Hot Shot" military guy who couldn't hit the target at 100 yards with a Springfield Model 1903. His partner did at 50 yards.
Mr. "Hot Shot"'s excuse was the Springfield's rear sight was loose.
In my lifetime I have used Model 1903s a "Bunch" and have never used one or ever heard of one with a "loose rear sight". These weapons are checked prior to using them on the show.
Probably Mr. "Hot Shot" forgot that the Springfields battle sights are set for 525 yards. At 100 yards using the battle sights and a "Six O'clock" sight picture, the bullets are going over the target.

What he said-supposedly these folks have some familiarity with firearms. Not being able to hit something that close with an '03? I thought I heard he tried some 30 shots?
Oprah could do better...
 
They are casting for the second season. So the guys who are better shots than the current crop can try signing up. :>)

I am too old, slow, and cranky, to try out. But my son, The Bullseye Shooter, may if it lasts till he's old enough.
 
So the producers dreamed up some gimmicks that, while annoying to some of us, can appeal to the limited attention span of the general public and maybe even convince some viewers that shooting sports are not bad and may actually be worth trying.

I was waiting for a well thought out reply like this...now I don't have to type it myself.
 
I love the show. There are enough boring shows on the history and development of Mosin Nagant, etc etc. This is a mass appeal show and is lots of fun. If it gets more people to see the sport in a positive light its a good thing.
 
The idea of the show is to test the shooters with weapons they AREN'T familar with and see who can adapt. A couple of weeks ago they were using Long Bows and Crossbows for Pete's sake.
That part I like. Seeing who can step completely outside their own disipline and adapt their skills to something totally different than what they're used to. That's a challenge.
The soap opera I can do without. For example, the previously mentioned guy who was plotting against his own team. Lordy that pissed me off. But then that was the point wasn't it?
Reality TV. Nothing much real about it. :rolleyes:
 
This show is a giant pant load of poooooooooo. Contrived doesn't begin to explain the content. By accident I watched this week's episode. Who are these people? How were they chosen? Supposedly they are well know competitive shooters. I don't recognize a single person.

The loser of the shoot off stated that he was known as the "Little Giant" in shooting circles. Ha! I bet he is best known at his local XXX theater.

Out
West
 
Its horrible, I can't stand to watch it becuase it reminds me of "Survivor" with guns. Why do you need drama in a gun show?

It's just not for me.
 
last Sundays show had a contestant trying to set up a deal , if the team lost ,his coalition of 4 would pick the 2 best shooters , not his group , to compete against each other and get rid of 1 of them. To my joy one of the coalition went to the 2 best shots and explained what was happening.The major conspirator then kept proclaiming that the person that exposed his plan was a RAT and mouthed off as to how the RAT should be gotten rid of . In my way of thinking he is the one at fault for trying to get rid of good shooters on his team possibly so he has a better chance of winning.
This is just another reality show not a shooting show

I agree. I think a traitor is much lower than a rat, and the plotter was a traitor, IMO.
 
Saw this show for the first time yesterday. Am I the only one thinks this show blows? How can you screw up a great mixture of guns and competition? Let's hope there's no shootouts in the clubhouse before the end of the season.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Great idea for a 30 minute show. Pro's go out, shoot up a BUNCH of ammo, someone loses adn goes home. Come back tomorrow and we'll shoot the next 30 minute segment.


Think about it, Blue team and red team pick one shooter each, they shoot at a 200, 400 and 600 yard target. Red team shoots 4 bullets and the game is over????????????????????????????????? Blue team looses

No match should be less than 100 rounds total for each team. Score the targets and then do a shoot off if necessary. This shooting 5 rounds every other day and sitting by the pool "strategizing" blows.



BUT, way to much BS, Drama and far too little shooting of any kind. It's more of a "Big Brother" show than shooting.

The shooting requirments are well thought out and you must be able to adapt, unlike the Grand Master Glock Shooter who isn't winning his "Voting" game very well.

Don't waste my time with it any more.
 
I agree with the 30 minute show sentiment. I love the different weapon aspect of the show, and obviously the shooting portion, but the who 45 minutes of clubhouse banter sh..stuff, is way too much. Glad someone else mentioned this, as well as the show host who puts his hands on his hips to talk. Wish I had DVR as everytime I watch the show now, I get extremely irritated at a contestant. Hopefully, the pro-Glock shooter who complained endlessly about the Beretta 92, and blasted through ammo in the test session, the Marine with the big scheme to eliminate shooters, who wouldn't stop saying the word "rat." At least the contestant that couldn't shoot the Springfield got sent packing the first night.
 
Back
Top