Mako Group Stocks/Grips - Any Experience?

For anyone interested, here's what I ordered.

404 - Document Not Found
^^^
$99 Shipped. Not a bad price, non recoil reducing model, because I'm a real man and this is a .22lr. LOL

These rail covers, so I don't have to change the front out...
404 - Document Not Found

Also this grip.
Mako Group Rubberized Pistol Grips for M16/M4/AR15 AGR-43-T, AGR-43-B, AGR-43-OD. Mako Group AR15 Pistol Grips.

I don't know about the colors for the grip, as it says tan and everything else says FDE when ordered, but I also don't think they'd add another color when the others listed match the usual OD and Black.

I'll let you all know and post pictures obviously of how it looks installed and how the colors match up.
 
Nevermind, I think the colors will work out fine...

376799_428628117182803_1909850766_n.jpg
 
As ModMyM&P said, no ... the grips almost appear to be rubber coated, but they are all polymer plastic.

I thought that they were rubber coated as well (kind of like you'd see on grips on a high end fishing rod or scuba equipment ... or even on the end of a set of quality made walking / hiking poles), but alas, they apparently were molded from a prototype which was rubber coated.

Needless to say, they feel EXCELLENT in the user's hand(s).

Very ergonomic.
Very durable.
Easy to install / maintain.

The Mako Group shall have my business for a long time. An EXCELLENT company with tried and true Israeli made and tested products.

You'll pay more for them initially, but I think that when it comes down to durability, they will exceed your expectations.

Take care,

august242

:)
 
the cheek riser is handy if you are rolling old school with a high mounted scope on the handle but I've pulled it from both of those that I use.

I saw the price jump too. Glad to have some at yesterday's pricing.

:D No "old school" or handle (never cared for them on the old M-16's either). It's because of the large front bells (50's) on my scope's that I like the cheek risers. Being there was room on the rear,I also left on my flip up BUIS.
 
For anyone interested, here's what I ordered.


Let me know how that Mag Well Grip works out for you. My FAB Mag Grip wouldn't work on my RR w/CMMG lower or my 15-22. I "think" the 15-22 "could" be do-able with a little work. Just be VERY careful when sanding & filing (Dremel ?) it,so you don't get into the mounting screws. They "might" be real close. They will fit on the FS Modern Sporting Rifles just fine though.
 
The grip that I ordered is the AGR 43, it is the new rubberized version of the AG 43. It is coated in rubber.

Yes, I heard that the mag well grip requires a little bit of work to get installed. I'll be gentle with it and post pictures of the finished product, and how I got there. Just found some interesting things out with her magazines. I'll be posting about that soon

Blasted from my Samsung Galaxy SIII (CM10.1 Masta Mix).
 
I have the mako group grip and a mako group stock. I like them and the stock has an integrated rubber butt pad which gives a little more traction and the integrated cheek riser is pretty spot on. I like the over all look of it.

90cc0a3f-b1a7-47cc-bab9-75cac5dc54ff_zps01c8add8.jpg

Only thing I didn't care for in that grip was the open space in the top back of the handgrip. Could some heat be applied to get it to match the back of the lower ?
 
Fitting info for the MWG, with info for the S&W M&P 15-22:
Installing the Mako MWG M16/AR-15 Magwell Grip | 7.62 Precision Custom Firearm Finishes

When you get the stuff you will see that the colours will be pretty close, with a little variation on the rubber stuff. The rail covers will be slightly darker, but really noticeable only if you lay them over another part. You won't really see the difference on the rifle. This is because they are made by the same company that makes everyone's rail covers, and the DE colour they use is what we get.

The AGR-43 grip will be slightly lighter than the other parts. Dark Earth products change colour with use. They will get darker from dirt, etc. and the rubber parts stain more easily than the polymer parts, so they will get darker more quickly, and would end up darker than the polymer parts if they started out as dark.
 
Ordered and received the AGR 2 times now both times it was a light tan, no where near the same shade as the other mako or moe parts.

My moe + grip just showed up, and close enough.

Pics tomorrow. Thanks for the link.

Blasted from my Samsung Galaxy SIII (CM10.1 Masta Mix).
 
Mako

I'm a Magpul guy, my Rock River M4 is Magpulled out with Foilage Green ACS stock, Carbine front, MOE + grip, and MBUS sights for when my green dot goes out (hah, as if).

529516_2864267373081_1702134449_n_zps420f54f6.jpg

^^^
Really old picture, has a nice green dot on it and a Viking Tactics wide padded sling now.

My Remington 870 Tactical also is Magpulled to hell, with the front, stock, sling mounts, and more.

IMG_20130202_132355_zps8a706f43.jpg

IMG_20130202_132415_zps9cf8c626.jpg

IMG_20130202_132424_zps97d6c0b0.jpg

^^^
Still haven't found a sling I like.

My 15-22 is a MOE version, and though I love Magpul, I'm seriously considering some Mako Group parts on it. The front grip for my Rock River is a Mako, and I decided to try it out on the 15-22 to see how it felt (I got the one that holds a flashlight and has an integrated switch to turn it on).

IMG_20130217_162056_zpsf0cb0e9b.jpg


I'm finding that I like the Mako stuff pretty well too, but wanted to see if anyone else has used their stocks and grips on the 15-22. I saw a few pictures here of some grips, but no stocks.

Particularly I'm looking at FDE here, but I'm just looking for some opinions of those that have/had them or have photos installed.

Thanks!

Do not waste your time and money with the Mag Well Grip, it do not fit the 15-22! :mad:
 
My two cents: I have a good friend who just completed a build of a .458 Socom AR with Wilson Combat parts, and he added one of the stocks that is pictured a few times above with the adjustable cheek riser. I got to shoot it this week, and naturally, I stuck my face right up in there where Mako seems to think I would, and this stock beat me up pretty bad with the higher recoil of that rifle. There were way too many rough edges, adjustment points, and just too much "stuff" to catch on my face, much less any gear that the user might have. I suspect that with the 15-22 the recoil would not be an issue, but I have to admit I was anxious to look in the mirror after trying this, as I would have bet money that I was bleeding.

From a purely visual point of view (only my opinion), it just all seems like way too much for a rifle format that is built on pure simplicity. Too many finger slots, everything seems over-sized to me, and it's just plain tacky.

I never would have considered myself to be "old school" by any means, but I don't think that the AR format has caught up with the futuristic look of most of the accessories that are pictured here, and frankly I hope it never does.
 
Ordered and received the AGR 2 times now both times it was a light tan, no where near the same shade as the other mako or moe parts.

My moe + grip just showed up, and close enough.

Pics tomorrow. Thanks for the link.

Blasted from my Samsung Galaxy SIII (CM10.1 Masta Mix).

As I said before, the AGR-43 will be slightly lighter than the polymer parts. I am looking at one now that I installed about 5 months ago, and it now matches the polymer parts - they darken with use as the rubber will hold more carbon and oils than the polymer parts as you use it.

As far as fit of the grips on the M&P 15-22, keep in mind that they were designed for use with MIL-SPEC rifles and the M&P 15-22 lower has a different shape, so fit will not be exact.
 
My two cents: I have a good friend who just completed a build of a .458 Socom AR with Wilson Combat parts, and he added one of the stocks that is pictured a few times above with the adjustable cheek riser. I got to shoot it this week, and naturally, I stuck my face right up in there where Mako seems to think I would, and this stock beat me up pretty bad with the higher recoil of that rifle. There were way too many rough edges, adjustment points, and just too much "stuff" to catch on my face, much less any gear that the user might have. I suspect that with the 15-22 the recoil would not be an issue, but I have to admit I was anxious to look in the mirror after trying this, as I would have bet money that I was bleeding.

From a purely visual point of view (only my opinion), it just all seems like way too much for a rifle format that is built on pure simplicity. Too many finger slots, everything seems over-sized to me, and it's just plain tacky.

I never would have considered myself to be "old school" by any means, but I don't think that the AR format has caught up with the futuristic look of most of the accessories that are pictured here, and frankly I hope it never does.

I have used these stocks with cheek risers on harder recoiling weapons without any discomfort when used as intended. However, having said that, I do not recommend using the cheek riser on an AR. It is intended more for shotguns, AKs, vz.58s, and other weapons that don't have an AR-styel charging handle and that have stock designs that are too low for use with optics.

On the AR platform, with a flat-top receiver, it takes high rings or mounts just to get an optic high enough. Rarely is a cheek riser an advantage. The only time it is an advantage is if the optic is mounted higher than usual - on a carry handle mount, or with a riser for some reason.

Because of this, I recommend foregoing the cheek riser when using any of the stocks on a flat-top AR and saving the extra weight and expense that will probably not be a benefit.

I would always use the cheekpiece on an optic-equipt AK, vz.58, or shotgun, though.
 
However, having said that, I do not recommend using the cheek riser on an AR.
I would always use the cheekpiece on an optic-equipt AK, vz.58, or shotgun, though.

With all due respect, then why would you sell a stock that is all but specific to the AR platform that has this feature? Can you name one factory shotgun that could accept your stock, with or without the cheekriser, right out of the box? I have a cheek riser on my Benelli (Mesa Tactical) and it's got a completely smooth side (where it meets the shooter's face), just like the edge of my STR. Not to mention, I have to believe that shooting 12 gauge slugs out of my short barrel tactical style shotgun has more felt recoil (a.k.a. "kick) than any AR rifle out there.
 
Last edited:
Please look at our products - you will see why:

In Israel there are a lot of weapons with fixed carry handles (M16A1 and carbines based on it) These can benefit from a cheek riser.

We have a number of stock systems for AK rifles. As far as I know collapsible stocks are not used on IDF AKs, but our collapsible stock systems for AKs are used in great numbers by many militaries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America.

We have a couple collapsible stock systems for vz.58. They are approved for issue by the Czech government and you can see our vz.58 accessories being used in combat by Czech special forces in Afghanistan if you do a google search. These guys are running optics on the vz.58s.

We have collapsible stock systems for Remington and Mossberg shotguns. Many other companies offer collapsible stock adapters for these and other shotguns. So right out of the box, 12 gauge
870s, 500s, and 590s can take our stock systems, as can some clones. Other shotguns already set up with collapsible stocks can as well.

Many other weapons use or are adapted to use M4-type collapsible stocks, such as XCR, side-charging ARs, AK-style shotguns, even bolt-action rifles.

We cannot hold people's hands and basically have to leave it up the the end user to understand their particular weapon system and what will be an advantage or a disadvantage. For me, running the stocks at the first position out from fully collapsed as I do, I do not need or like a cheek riser on an AR. I do use cheek risers on my AKs, vz.58s, and my 870.

I am actually having a hard time picturing where people are holding their faces to get hit with anything on those stocks. I shoot with them all the time and have never seen anyone have a problem with getting hit with anything.
 
Please look at our products - you will see why:

In Israel there are a lot of weapons with fixed carry handles (M16A1 and carbines based on it) These can benefit from a cheek riser.

I use a large bell scopes and the Cheek Risers work just fine on all mine. My scopes are mounted as close to the barrel as I can get with them. I'm talking long range scopes with VERY large front bells like 50+.

AND for the record. MAKO Defense products for FS MSR's are second to none for durability. :D
 
My two cents: I have a good friend who just completed a build of a .458 Socom AR with Wilson Combat parts, and he added one of the stocks that is pictured a few times above with the adjustable cheek riser. I got to shoot it this week, and naturally, I stuck my face right up in there where Mako seems to think I would, and this stock beat me up pretty bad with the higher recoil of that rifle. There were way too many rough edges, adjustment points, and just too much "stuff" to catch on my face, much less any gear that the user might have. I suspect that with the 15-22 the recoil would not be an issue, but I have to admit I was anxious to look in the mirror after trying this, as I would have bet money that I was bleeding.

From a purely visual point of view (only my opinion), it just all seems like way too much for a rifle format that is built on pure simplicity. Too many finger slots, everything seems over-sized to me, and it's just plain tacky.

I never would have considered myself to be "old school" by any means, but I don't think that the AR format has caught up with the futuristic look of most of the accessories that are pictured here, and frankly I hope it never does.

Cool story, but this is on a 15-22. In my other thread, I did write that I sat down and cleaned up all of the sharp edges and untrimmed flashing, so the riser and other parts are smooth all around. I didn't order it for the riser, I could care less about it, I ordered the combo because it was cheaper than ordering the 2 parts one by one (stock and mag well grip), and it came with the riser. I'm not using it, but I found it is perfect for my wife to line up her head with my green dot.

While I did clean it up, none of the sharp edges or flashing were anywhere they would touch my face. Not too sure how you are shooting with one of these, maybe with your face in front of the riser when it is up?

Beyond that, the only parts "sticking out" are the two knobs that adjust the riser, which are also not sharp or rough.

The riser assembly comes off easily enough if I decide to take it off, but since it is my rifle, I figure I'll leave it on if I want to.

There are only 2 points that adjust, the standard adjustment for a collapsable AR stock, and the riser height adjustment. 2 adjustment points is too much?

And finger slots? Too large? What?!? I'm pretty sure there are no slots for your fingers on here and the thing is actually a bit smaller than the Magpul ACS in most respects, but perhaps a tiny bit wider at the battery compartment.

As I said before, the AGR-43 will be slightly lighter than the polymer parts. I am looking at one now that I installed about 5 months ago, and it now matches the polymer parts - they darken with use as the rubber will hold more carbon and oils than the polymer parts as you use it.

As far as fit of the grips on the M&P 15-22, keep in mind that they were designed for use with MIL-SPEC rifles and the M&P 15-22 lower has a different shape, so fit will not be exact.

That has nothing to do with it Mr Mako, lighter shade it is not, it's a completely different color. I live in the desert, out in New Mexico, I know desert colors. Everything else matches pretty well, even between the Magpul and Mako stuff, not perfect, but close enough. These are "different shades". The AGR is a very light beach sand color, looks like the color of the sand from when I was in Saint Croix last year. The FDE is just that, Flat Dark Earth, a brownish color.

Yes, if I go change the oil on my car, pick up the grip, and use it for an hour or so that way, it'll be darker, but that's not what I bought here, nor am I going to do that. Funny that my Magpul Foliage stuff, bought from different sources, all matches. The grip even looks the same as the rest of it after almost 2 years...

Hell, even 2 different model PMAGs in the same color, ordered a year apart, still match perfectly.

Now, if I could just get Mako to get me return authorization for the broken and mismatched grip. Took 12 days to get a reply from them this time.

Also, so anyone that sees this knows, yes, the Mako stocks are ONE size fits all. They do this by having 2 tabs on the buffer tube channel that push against the tube to cause friction.

YES, it still wobbles, not bad, but similar to the stock that came on the MOE versions. I do love the stock, but the way they went about doing this instead of just making 2 different versions is annoying. After years of use, you'll have some wear on your buffer tube (metal ones may even lose their finish I'd think), and the wobble will probably get worse because of wear on the little compression tabs. Interesting idea, but I'm not sure about the long term.

I'm sure we'll hear about it in the next few hours from Mako Man.

Oh, and the last comment on the Mako stuff I've bought. Every single piece I've gotten from them needs touching up. The rail covers need a sanding block or the corners are sharp enough to cut you, not to mention the flashing there and on the edges. I mentioned the stock, but even the AGR TAN grip I got would need some clean up with a razor if I were to put it on.

ALL of my Magpul stuff, the only thing I've ever cleaned up are the sprue points on the magazines, and that's only because I'm OCD about plastic parts.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top