SPOILER ALERT!
The movie opens with "based on a true story," which set off alarm bells for me. That means the director took a lot of license with the facts and the book, which I read. Marcus Luttrell, the lone SEAL survivor was a consultant on the film and apparently is happy with the way it turn out in representing his story.
I saw the movie last night and would give it high marks as an action film. The acting, cinematography and directing were first-rate. Character development fell somewhat short but how much can you cram into 2 hours and change?
What bothered me were two major differences between the book and movie:
1. When the SEAL team encountered the goats and three herdsmen, a discussion ensued as to what to do with them. Lt. Michael Murphy who led the group of 3 enlisted guys said there were three options: kill them, tie them up or let them go. He then asked his team for opinions and they were generally split on what to do. In the book, Murphy put it to a vote and at Luttrell's urging they decided to let the goatherders go. However, in the film, Murphy, rightly as officer and leader of the team, makes the call. This is an important plot discrepancy. Officers should always decide. The military is not a democracy. Perhaps the filmmaker and Marcus wanted to show that Murphy was truly in charge but if it happened the way Marcus said in the book then it's quite a different story.
2. In the book, Marcus, his legs badly wounded, has to virtually crawl six miles to safety with no pants, which were blown away in the firefights. In the movie, he's wearing pants and walks his way into the arms of friendly Afghans not far away.
Other differences between book and movie: Marcus never saw the helo get shot down; he was on the other side of the mountain. In the film, he sees it first-hand. And there were many others, mostly minor but still enough to make me wonder how much a man, who was so badly wounded, under duress and hallucinating much of the time until his rescue could accurately remember the sequence of events as they occurred, much less the dialog.
I believe Marcus and his fellow SEALS acted with the highest degree of honor and courage and deserve all the praise heaped upon them. I am a Navy veteran and thought the film was realistic in its portrayal of military life. But I believe a great deal of dramatic license was taken in order to present these men in the best possible light and downplay the numerous mistakes made in planning and executing Operation Redwings, which had failure stamped all over it from the get-go. The biggest of which was dropping 4 SEALS into unknown territory in the black of night with a vague mission without adequate backup. There is a great deal of discussion about ROE (rules of engagement), which caused confusion and hesitation among the team as to whether they should or should not kill the goatherders. Marcus said it was the biggest mistake he ever made in advocating for their release. But he was worried about the political fallout back home.
Finally, the film avoids any conclusions about whether the U.S. should have been and still have a military role in Afghanistan. SEALS did their duty as they were ordered to do and they did it admirably, but questions linger about the wisdom of fighting a war that was and is essentially a dispute among Afghans alone.
All in all, a great book and great film, these observations notwithstanding.