Texas Star
US Veteran
I lked the post about Norwegian game wardens being issued Glock 10mm's. That suggests they think they'll work. That is a govt. endorsement, probably after some tests.
A Norwegian scientist had to kill a polar bear with a S&W .44 Magnum a few years ago, but I don't know which load he used. It upset some jerk readers of Natl. Geographic. I wish they could find themselves in his position of being attacked. I rather suspect that they would also shoot!
A doctor hunting in Alaska killed a big grizzly that was almost on him while he dressed a caribou carcass. The gun was a Ruger Super Blackhawk, but he didn't cite the ammo. The story ran in, Sporting Classics a few years ago.
An Aaskan bear guide said in Rifle or Handloader that he and his daughter use Ruger Security-Six .357's. He has seen a lot of bears killed, so that says something.
The late publisher Bob Petersen used a nickled M-29 S&W with 6.5-inch bbl. to take large bears, inc one polar bear. I think he used either the factory GC lead 240 grain basic load or the Norma 240 grain softpoint. Maybe both. He's dead , so you can't ask which. But if you find an old issue of, Guns and Ammo, you can read the articles where he did that. But it was in the 1960's, so the ammo has probably changed.
A Montana game warden had to kill a grizzly that attacked him and he used his service weapon, a S&W M-66. I read an account by a witness and he said the load was the issued 158 grain one. Contact the Montana game wardens office to ask what they issued then and where the bullet hit. I believe that only one of the six rounds fired in a panic killed, and I think it was a heart shot. But the .357 sufficed.
I'm sick and tired of the people who post in almost every bear thread that they'd use a .22 or .25 auto, shoot a companion in the knee, and run so the bear will take the injured friend.
This is a serious subject and that sort of "humor" is out of place.
In, Sixguns, Elmer Keith told of a friend who killed a big grizzly that stood up and started popping its teeth at the man. He killed it with a nickled Colt .45 SAA with 7.5-inch bbl. and the basic BP load with maybe 40 grains of the black powder and 250-255 grain bullet. I'd have to look it up to see where he aimed, but I think it was what butchers call the "sticking place." Or he may have aimed just under the head at the throat. The bullet probably cut the spinal cord in the latter case.
A well used handgun in skilled hands can indeed save you from a bear. And it doesn't take a 350 grain bullet to do that.
I have a stash of Remington's 165 grain .357 ammo in case I ever need to carry in bear country. But if I still owned a .44 Magnum, I'd go with whichever brand of 240 grain softpoint shot best in my gun. If I still handloaded, I'd use the basic Keith load with a hard cast 250 grain Keith bullet.
And I'd go to the zoo and the museums and study bears and think as I watched them move in the zoo which sight hold would I take on them if I had to shoot one. Do the same with other animals. It'll make you a better hunter and a quicker instinctive shot.
I hope that Bear Bio posts about this. He's one of the few here whose professional opinion is worth listening to. I doubt that he'll say to shoot a friend in the knee and run...
A Norwegian scientist had to kill a polar bear with a S&W .44 Magnum a few years ago, but I don't know which load he used. It upset some jerk readers of Natl. Geographic. I wish they could find themselves in his position of being attacked. I rather suspect that they would also shoot!

A doctor hunting in Alaska killed a big grizzly that was almost on him while he dressed a caribou carcass. The gun was a Ruger Super Blackhawk, but he didn't cite the ammo. The story ran in, Sporting Classics a few years ago.
An Aaskan bear guide said in Rifle or Handloader that he and his daughter use Ruger Security-Six .357's. He has seen a lot of bears killed, so that says something.
The late publisher Bob Petersen used a nickled M-29 S&W with 6.5-inch bbl. to take large bears, inc one polar bear. I think he used either the factory GC lead 240 grain basic load or the Norma 240 grain softpoint. Maybe both. He's dead , so you can't ask which. But if you find an old issue of, Guns and Ammo, you can read the articles where he did that. But it was in the 1960's, so the ammo has probably changed.
A Montana game warden had to kill a grizzly that attacked him and he used his service weapon, a S&W M-66. I read an account by a witness and he said the load was the issued 158 grain one. Contact the Montana game wardens office to ask what they issued then and where the bullet hit. I believe that only one of the six rounds fired in a panic killed, and I think it was a heart shot. But the .357 sufficed.
I'm sick and tired of the people who post in almost every bear thread that they'd use a .22 or .25 auto, shoot a companion in the knee, and run so the bear will take the injured friend.
This is a serious subject and that sort of "humor" is out of place.
In, Sixguns, Elmer Keith told of a friend who killed a big grizzly that stood up and started popping its teeth at the man. He killed it with a nickled Colt .45 SAA with 7.5-inch bbl. and the basic BP load with maybe 40 grains of the black powder and 250-255 grain bullet. I'd have to look it up to see where he aimed, but I think it was what butchers call the "sticking place." Or he may have aimed just under the head at the throat. The bullet probably cut the spinal cord in the latter case.
A well used handgun in skilled hands can indeed save you from a bear. And it doesn't take a 350 grain bullet to do that.
I have a stash of Remington's 165 grain .357 ammo in case I ever need to carry in bear country. But if I still owned a .44 Magnum, I'd go with whichever brand of 240 grain softpoint shot best in my gun. If I still handloaded, I'd use the basic Keith load with a hard cast 250 grain Keith bullet.
And I'd go to the zoo and the museums and study bears and think as I watched them move in the zoo which sight hold would I take on them if I had to shoot one. Do the same with other animals. It'll make you a better hunter and a quicker instinctive shot.
I hope that Bear Bio posts about this. He's one of the few here whose professional opinion is worth listening to. I doubt that he'll say to shoot a friend in the knee and run...