The Model 686+/686 For A Concealed Carry?

I frequently carry an M60-15 as the Kernel suggests but when in the woods or river fishing I carry an M69 without difficulty (until you have to shoot a full house 44 mag out of it) with the first two rounds being snake shot. I have carried 686s, a 4"+, an SSR and a 6"+(in a shoulder rig). All with no issues. I'm 5'7" and 71 years old, so you can probably do it too.
 
I had a 3" 586 with Spegel Boot Grips.... found it used/like new at a great price at a small out of the way LGS.

In the year or so I had it I think I wore it maybe 3 or 4 times.......the next day if concealed carry was called for .... it was back to my 3" 66 with +P .38s or 158gr soft points at the cabin........ if I could carry outside waistband...... I'd go to my stand-by a custom 4" round butt 686........

In many ways the 3" 586 was a great gun but neither fish nor fowl. There truly was a very good reason Bill Jorden convinced S&W to build a .357 magnum on the k-frame...... "a gun carried a lot and shot a little (w/ .357s)"


My 3" 586???..........I figured out why it got traded ANIB ...........it eventually got traded again on a PC Shorty-9.
 
Last edited:
I have a 686+ 3" and, more recently, a 686PC+ 2-1/2" in my CC rotation. Both fit in a Sparks VM2 purchased for the 3". I don't mind the weigh, which is distributed well due to the excellent design of the VM2. I have boot grips on both, which conform to the round grip and extend only to the bottom of the frame. The butt is held tightly to my side and doesn't protrude or print.

The PC has a non-fluted cylinder and is cut for moon clips (can be used without). I prefer flutes for speed of reloading, but there is actually little difference in practice. Given a choice, 7 rounds are better than 6 for self defense.

I have a 4" 66, which is probably the ideal compromise for carry and actual shooting. A 686 is considerably stronger, only slightly larger and about 3 oz heavier, which helps manage full .357 Magnum loads, which are all I carry or shoot. They're also a lot easier to find than revolvers which have been out of print for nearly 20 years.

The 2-1/2" 686 has a short extractor rod, whereas the 3" is full length. This is not a big deal. Just pop the extractor with the palm of your hand to eject the cartridges quickly.

I think .357 is nearly ideal for SD. It has 50% more "thump" than a .45, and no slide to jam or stack in close quarters (like a car). I don't lose any brass at the shooting range either.
 
Last edited:
My first concealed carry revolver was the 2.25" 60-14. It turned out to be a great choice. It's a ton lighter than an L-frame and yet it's all steel -- a lot easier to shot well than the alloy snubbies.

In the winter I can carry a 66 or 19 snub, but I never carry my 3" 686+ -- just too much.
 
When you say actual experience does that mean that exact model ?

I ask because I just switch this month back to carrying a revolver from a semi-automatic. And while mine may not be quite as heavy as what your thinking about it is never the less a BIG revolver.

I thought I knew what I was getting into,,,Ha ! Little did I know.
I use to carry two guns, 642 up front in the pocket and either a G30 or G39 tucked underneath. My primary believe it or not was my 642 because I simply don't trust semi-automatics, but I carried those Glocks because I have real thing for a .45. And on the flip side do not trust my ability with a .38 because I'm a terrible shot and a leg or arm hit may not be enough to slow the threat down.

But there is simply no better draw in my opinion coming out of the front pocket, I could do in under 1.5 seconds. And safely.

Now lets get back to the subject, you are in for rude awaking if you try to CCW those guns and it doesn't matter if you get the 2.5 inch barrel. Can it be done, sure, all depends how much you want to spend to make it happen, how much you are willing to compromise.

I thought I had it all figured out, yeah right. I've had to completely change how I dress and I am still trying to find a comfortable spot to carry. And forget about any quick draw I'll be lucky if I even get it out.

Forget about what the gun cost me, I'm now into the hundreds of dollars in what it has cost me just to carry this beast.
I must be crazy,:confused: but I sure like this gun I got.

Good luck.

No, any revolver of similar weight and size will suffice. ;)
 
Perhaps your lifestyle would impact usability, as much as size and weight. I'm a senior citizen female with serious health problems, and I can carry a 3" 686+ all day. I even golf with it when bears are active nearby.
But I don't/can't run, or even walk fast or far, so actual "carrying" is limited and slow. It's not my EDC, but if local weather allowed regular use of a cover garment, I'd use it more. It even fits in my holster purse.
 
Perhaps your lifestyle would impact usability, as much as size and weight. I'm a senior citizen female with serious health problems, and I can carry a 3" 686+ all day. I even golf with it when bears are active nearby.
But I don't/can't run, or even walk fast or far, so actual "carrying" is limited and slow. It's not my EDC, but if local weather allowed regular use of a cover garment, I'd use it more. It even fits in my holster purse.

Well, once you mention "bears"......
 
I've carried a 4" 686 and a 3" 686+, both in a belt holster and the 3" also in a Galco horizontal shoulder holster. Either one is not that bad to carry, and I prefer the 3" because of the shorter barrel and extra round. The 3" 686+ weight is similar to a 4" K Frame (L=36.8 Oz, K=36.6 Oz). Everyone's tolerance for how much weight they can carry is different. I've been carrying a full size pistol with duty gear daily for 23+ years. So carrying just a revolver with one or two speed loaders/strips is light compared to a full duty rig. That, and I'm 6' and weigh 200 so an extra 10 Oz or so isn't that big of a difference. No cheapo flimsy holsters or belts in the mix helps also.



I've seen people with cell phones that print more than this rig.... :D
 
Last edited:
I don't know how any of you guys conceal-carry a gun this big/heavy - I couldn't even imagine concealing my 686+ (although it's a 4", but 1" shorter doesn't seem like it would make that much of a difference.)

That being said, I also can't understand how anyone carries ANYTHING AIWB so maybe I am just built oddly/dress funny.
 
I don't know how any of you guys conceal-carry a gun this big/heavy - I couldn't even imagine concealing my 686+ (although it's a 4", but 1" shorter doesn't seem like it would make that much of a difference.)
I have to chuckle at this. With four children and ten grandchildren, I've spent countless hours with a child on my hip as I cooked, cleaned, shopped, and everything else you can imagine.
Compared to a squirming, crying infant, a 686 is a breeze to carry. But like thomasinaz says "No cheapo flimsy holsters or belts in the mix helps also." ;)

PS: the smaller round grip of the 3" is easier to conceal than the 4" square grip. My Hogue bantam makes it a bit smaller than stock, as well.
 
Last edited:
A 686 seems a bit heavy for CC to me, but I guess it could be managed if you put your mind to it. For me, the pants would sag a bit.

I like the 442/642 because they go in the pocket and I don't notice them there. I suppose a K frame with a 3" barrel (none currently being made, and generally garnering high prices when sold used) would be a good compromise between the J and the L frames.

But in winter, with me wearing a jacket, my 868 Plus with 3" could be carried relatively easily, and would be a great gun to have for a walk in the woods.
 
I don't know how any of you guys conceal-carry a gun this big/heavy - I couldn't even imagine concealing my 686+ (although it's a 4", but 1" shorter doesn't seem like it would make that much of a difference.)

That being said, I also can't understand how anyone carries ANYTHING AIWB so maybe I am just built oddly/dress funny.

3" 686+ in Triple K IWB holster:

Full_Size_Render_4.jpg


Full_Size_Render_1.jpg


Full_Size_Render.jpg
 
Topsarge

I just bought the 686 6 shot with the 2.5" barrel. I was hoping to put it in my concealed carry rotation but because of the weight, I wasn't to sure it would work. I was talked in to getting a Remora holster. It didn't work. I bought a shoulder holster in the past from Craft Holsters and I liked it. I checked their sight and found an IWB #92. Works perfectly with this heavy piece. The only thing it doesn't have is a sweat shield, but I have it getting done now. It carries as easy as my lighter guns that I carry in Alien Gear Cloke tuck 2 holsters. Alien doesn't make one for the 686. Im now able to CC this gun plus I have 2 N frames snubbies that I can carry with the same holster.
 
To Dispatch

I just bought the 2.5" 6 shot. I got a holster from Craft Holsters #92 IWB. This carries very well and now us in my CCW rotation. I'm having a leather sweat shield put on now. For a heavy gun this carries great in this holster. Plus I can carry my other two N frame snubbies in the same holster.
 
I carry a 696 Plus, 2.5" in the cooler months in Michigan, when I can carry OWB, when I use a Tagua pancake holster, with thumb break retention. I keep it covered with a wind breaker, or hoodie. I find it reasonably comfortable, but I'm 6'3", and 275lbs.

s-l500.jpg


Smith Wesson 686 s w Revolver 2 5" Barrel Black Leather Holster Right Tagua | eBay


During hot weather, I still resort back to my 640 J-frame, pocket carry.
 
Back
Top