Personally, I don't understand the sentiment that the 110 is too large while the 112 is not either, because to me the difference in size/weight between the two is negligible, but sometimes those little things can make all the difference when it comes to individual differences.
For example, depending on what sort of pants/belt you wear, I can see how the 110 would be too big/heavy when the 112 is not. Obviously, if you wear larger pants with deeper pockets or a sturdier belt, then the 110 is no problem to carry, but if you wear smaller pants with shallow pockets or a flimsy belt, then the 110 just won't work, but a 112 just might.
So there you go.
I remember about 15 years ago I had to wear a rather light pair of trousers with a pretty thin belt as per the dress code of my job, so the knife that I carried at the time was some little Bucklite knife that was somewhere between the size of a Buck 55 and a 112. Under other circumstances, I woukd have preferred a larger knife, but it's what my work clothes could carry concealed and was good enough to slice open cardboard boxes, through tape, shipping envelopes, plastic packaging, bags of chips, and in a worse case scenario could have easily been used to defend myself, so it served its purpose while fitting within the confines of what my work attire would allow me to carry.