LVSteve
Member
The problem with that non-endorsement of the Hi Power is that it’s a case study of one. I also wonder how old and well used that British Army Hi Power was when he came across it. The major reason they replaced their Hi Powers was that they were WWII vintage pistols that were worn out.
The choice of a Glock as a replacement was unfortunate but not all that surprising, especially from a per unit cost perspective.
In contrast to your experience I have fired and own a large number of reportedly superior pistols and often find myself thinking “I prefer the Hi Power”. Then, it’s usually a matter of size, but that’s a concealed carry issue that doesn’t apply to a duty pistol.
From what I gathered, it wasn't a single weapon test. It was an analysis of where and tear on both types of weapon, and the HP came in second. I believe this took place in the 80s. Exactly what unit my source served in he never said, but if eating snakes was part of their repertoire, I wouldn't be all that surprised.