SnidelyWhiplash
Member
While the Johnson was a fine rifle...the fact is it had no real advantage over the Garand. The Garand was already in production even with some early kinks to work out...the Johnson had the advantage of being able to top off the magazine with single rounds but the magazine body was more subject to damage, the rifle was longer...the removable barrel was of little real advantage except possibly to airborne troops...and the required bayonet was all but useless.
To the shooter...the Johnson with its recoil operation transmitted more felt recoil while the Garand's gas system softened it some.
Again...the Johnson was and is a fine rifle...but the Garand has since been well proven as the better combat rifle. The Army did make a mistake in not adopting the Johnson LMG which was a superior weapon in the role it was designed for.
To the shooter...the Johnson with its recoil operation transmitted more felt recoil while the Garand's gas system softened it some.
Again...the Johnson was and is a fine rifle...but the Garand has since been well proven as the better combat rifle. The Army did make a mistake in not adopting the Johnson LMG which was a superior weapon in the role it was designed for.