A 22lr behind the ear would be cheap and effective. I am sure a brain surgeon could come up with the optimum spot and angle
I agree. 6 or 10 rounds of CF and all the associated furnishings surely aren't really necessary (?) Mobile vets here use a .22 to put down animals, and the BC Conservation Service often uses a Ruger .22 mag rifle, even apparently for (trapped) bears. Had a deer with a broken leg next door a few years ago and they dispatched it quickly with one shot from about 20 yds.
Although sometimes outrage leads me to indulge in "vengeance, preferably as messy/cruel as possible" as some here have endorsed, ultimately I cannot go there. If, as many believe, these people will spend eternity in hell, we should just get them there as quickly and efficiently as possible!
The only problem with capital punishment is if the accused is wrongly convicted, and this has been known to happen. With better forensic analysis nowadays, such as advances in DNA testing, this
should reduce the chances but... No perfect answer here. It is apparently questionable as to how effective it is in discouraging others, as was pointed out I think on a thread on drug cartels recently. ("We've been executing people for murder for centuries but they still do it" or something like that. But there's no question that it cures recidivism.
steelslaver said:
When the blade severs the head, theory is the brain still functions for a second or 2.
Many years ago I read of a doctor who attended a guillotine execution c.1900 and he shouted at the executed man right after the blade fell. Apparently there was a sllght reaction
As to Albert Pierrepoint, I didn't see the movie but have read about him. An extraordinary career and a consummate professional. I believe, though, that he ultimately came out against capital punishment.
OK- sermon over,. Time for a late dinner.