The Harrington & Richardson Sportsman

A Model No. 196 "Eureka" Sportsman with its original box. The only thing wrong with it is it's not mine.
 

Attachments

  • Eureka1.jpg
    Eureka1.jpg
    162 KB · Views: 9
  • Eureka2.jpg
    Eureka2.jpg
    166.8 KB · Views: 8
Not a Sportsman, but a friend just acquired this prewar solid frame 922 that's in just outstanding condition.
 

Attachments

  • 922 #1532XX.jpg
    922 #1532XX.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 10
9j6gRPO.jpg


Love mine, a 1978 model. I originally had a 4" version and sold it to a buddy, then I guy I worked with had one he wanted to sell in the box (6") that was probably 20 years ago. I started shooting this again and is the main reason I decided to spent the cash on a 4" model 617.
 
Using the word "pristine" on that gun is quite the stretch. makes mine look NIB.
 
This is an interesting Model 199 Single Action dating to 1949, which was the first year postwar that they again became available, although Bill Goforth noted that this was via special order only. This example falls outside of the range of "J" prefixed serial numbers that he cited, but in any case is certainly not commonly seen: https://live.amoskeagauction.com/lo...on-Model-199-Sportsman-Single-Action-Revolver
 
That one ninety nine is a beautiful pistol.

On a more pragmatic note, my 999 fails to fire about thirty percent of the time. It exhibits light primer strikes. Is there a particular cause of this associated with this model of pistol? The hammer firing pin looks just fine. I suppose I need to investigate stronger springs for the hammer.
 
I'm adding this photo (just because) its another interesting make of top break - A WEBLEY MK IV, Originally a birds head frame & chambered in .455 caliber. I bought it from a small dealer in Maine, who specialized in British Surplus arms - years ago.
It was very cheap owing to the fact it arrived in a drum full of police confiscations. I took it on as a project, because it had some issues, & was the only late MK IV I could afford. The Frames Grip Strap had been CUT & bent forward to make it easier to conceal - Then Wrapped with lots of cloth electricians tape. The section where the lanyard had been - was gone.
I was able to re-weld it - into a more Bisley looking shape, & made walnut grips for it. I saw that its cylinder was shaved down for .45 acp & moon clips - but when loaded it wouldn't close, So I had to turn it down a bit more. I was pleased that it was otherwise in fine working mechanical condition. As Webleys became more valuable - I finally sold it, + my two Mk VI's to up-grade my arsenal. Imagine my surprise, when I found, & recognized this picture of it - FOR SALE again.
A rather chunky, heavy pocket pistol - with a history.
 

Attachments

  • MY Webley-Mark-IV-45-ACP_101544881_85483_FA8CC42C4D2FEC5A.jpg
    MY Webley-Mark-IV-45-ACP_101544881_85483_FA8CC42C4D2FEC5A.jpg
    883.3 KB · Views: 0
That one ninety nine is a beautiful pistol.

On a more pragmatic note, my 999 fails to fire about thirty percent of the time. It exhibits light primer strikes. Is there a particular cause of this associated with this model of pistol? The hammer firing pin looks just fine. I suppose I need to investigate stronger springs for the hammer.
I had this problem. The sight blade had slipped down and was interfering with the hammer.
 
Introduced in 1926, this is the predecessor to the Sportsman, a "22 Special Heavy Frame" model, touted in the company's sales literature at that time as "the heaviest 22 caliber revolver that we make." This example is of the original 7-shot type, which was superseded by a 9-shot version within a couple years. Note the "saw handle" walnut grips and rudimentary fixed sights.
 

Attachments

  • 22 Special.webp
    22 Special.webp
    43.1 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top