Performance Center 952-2 longslide vs Performance Center PPC9 6"

oldRoger said:
I have a Pardini GT with the 6" barrel. It has a superb trigger and the sights are typical of a high end match pistol.
I also have a CZ 75 from the CZ Custom Shop which is on a par with my P210.

I have reviewed some ransom rest tests done in Europe to test the precision of various commercial and hand loaded 9mm ammunition.
I am convinced that the limitation in all of the high end pistols discussed here is ammunition.

I cannot hold close enough to test ammunition for precision, but the tests I refer to above suggest that a 1.5" vertical string at 50 meters is typical of the very best commercial ammunition.
These tests also confirm that some ammunition is more precise in some pistols than others.

My point is that given the ammunition variables it would take a Ransom Rest and a lot of work to determine which is the most precise pistol which is not the same as the best match pistol.
Click to expand...
I would agree. Also, different pistols like different ammo, so its nearly impossible to do a completely fair comparison. Having said that, I do the best I can with what I have.

High end pistols are my thing. I'm fortunate enough to own pretty much all of them and enjoy pitting them against each other in my amateur sort of way.

I list many of them here...

https://www.1911addicts.com/threads/high-end-centerfire-pistol-buyers-guide.23120/
 
Nice report. When the 952 was still on the S&W website I decided not to buy a 5 inch and wait for a 6 inch. Regret that now. It is a pistol I keep my eyes open for. I guess I can contribute a picture of my 52-2.

 
dakota1911 said:
Nice report. When the 952 was still on the S&W website I decided not to buy a 5 inch and wait for a 6 inch. Regret that now. It is a pistol I keep my eyes open for.
Click to expand...
They aren't hard to find on Gunbroker. Finding them in your local shop is a rarity.
 
I have both barrel lengths of the 952-2 and the long slide version of the PPC9...I had a second PPC9 that I stupidly sold, and surprisingly, it was difficult to find a buyer for back then, when any cop could order one (and, wait). Also have a P210, but it is Danish military issue, so not a fair accuracy comparison...

Now, looking for an affordable 1911 6", without forward slide serrations.
 
I have a SIG P210, Pardini PC9 and a Smith & Wesson 952-2.
952-2 is for me the gun that I get the smallest groups with, and also the nicest one ;-)
 
This is a cool thread from some time ago. One thing that seems worth adding is a reply to one post made some time back with regards to whether or not the 952's trigger is "adjustable" or not.

It is, actually, it's adjustable for over-travel. The fantastic old 52 trigger is two-way adjustable (pre-travel and over-travel) but as far as I can tell, the 952 is only adjustable for over-travel.

It does NOT adjust in the same way the 52 does. The 52 uses a set screw behind the trigger, visible inside the trigger guard and adjusted from inside the magazine well, with one or both stocks removed.

The 952's over travel screw is quite different, it runs through the trigger bar and is adjusted from above the field-stripped frame. You must go at it from a slight angle with an allen wrench, it is hidden quite well and it just isn't all too "obvious" to find if you don't know that it's there.

I can admit that I'm probably a "trigger snob" by many definitions... this is to say that I appreciate VERY MUCH SO, a sweet, smooth, clean, light trigger. I don't whine & cry over lousy triggers (too much ;)) but I -love- a fine trigger.

Part of my appreciation for a fine target trigger is one with precious little over-travel. Bless you if you don't care a bit, but this is something I really notice a whole lot. A trigger with excessive over travel removed is pure joy for me. On the other hand, I have very little use or care for adjusting the pre-travel. I just don't care about pre-travel and it doesn't seem to to matter to me, but taking out over-travel is a phenomenal feature in a target gun, in my opinion.
 
micberg said:
I have a SIG P210, Pardini PC9 and a Smith & Wesson 952-2.
952-2 is for me the gun that I get the smallest groups with, and also the nicest one ;-)
Click to expand...


Pardinis are incredibly slick, but I don't find my GT9 to be as accurate as any of my P210's or PC Smiths.
 
This review is worthless. Who tests a target pistol for accuracy at 35 feet? The standard for pistols tested by the NRA and published in the Dope Bag or other articles was five five-shot groups at 25 yards (75 feet). Target pistols are often called on to hit the X-ring at 50 yards. Please at least give us 25 yard groups and 50 yard groups would be better.
A pox on your 35 foot groups - they mean nothing. As does your review.
 
flyer338 said:
This review is worthless. Who tests a target pistol for accuracy at 35 feet? The standard for pistols tested by the NRA and published in the Dope Bag or other articles was five five-shot groups at 25 yards (75 feet). Target pistols are often called on to hit the X-ring at 50 yards. Please at least give us 25 yard groups and 50 yard groups would be better.
A pox on your 35 foot groups - they mean nothing. As does your review.
Click to expand...
You brought back a decade old thread for this nonsense?

I own all the high end guns and will review them as I see fit. You don’t like it, post your own. Understood?
 
Don't know how I missed this thread back in the day but I did. There was certainly some interesting information and pictures passed around. Let's say it oozed of bling for gun guys, but if it's one thing I have learned in all my years of shooting it's that it is impossible to determine which is the best or most accurate pistol of all time. The testing of such is always argued including using a Ransom rest or not, type of ammo, what number of shots to fire and at what distance.

With a pistol I like to start any testing at 7 or 10 yards and go out from there. These days due to old age and eyes I only go out to 25 yards. 50 yards isn't in my bag of tricks anymore. I can learn what I need to know at 25 yards or less and I use IDPA targets only now. I no longer waste time and money shooting at traditional bullseye targets. I have yet to see a bad guy with a traditional bullseye target on his torso. All of the pistols spoken of in this thread should do quite well in my testing.

I fluctuate in my likes and dislikes of pistols. I love my Model 52's, but I also love my Sig P-210's and CZ's. I may opt to shoot any of these pistols on any given day and know I would do well with them. I have never owned the fancy S&W 952's or PPC guns spoken of in this thread as I didn't have the money for them when they were available from the factory and I instead concentrated on P-210's and as of late CZ's including a few Shadows and a TSO. I have a new Shadow Target on order and can't wait to get it, but alas, I will have to keep my horses in the barn and control myself. I did have the opportunity to shoot a friends 952 and I didn't do very well with it at the time, but I certainly don't fault the pistol. I always take a grain of salt when shooting an unfamiliar firearm.

I also own several Glocks that are relegated to EDC use for what should be obvious reasons and they shoot well for me too. Simply put I will never own the most accurate pistol of all time because there is no such thing. It's a miss-spoken dream of many people to say they have the most accurate of any firearm. They may think they have the most accurate, but the most accurate firearm is still under construction and in the future. And that's what makes this sport of shooting so much fun.

Rick H.
 
I did not have an opportunity to buy a S&W 952 eight years ago. Nevertheless, the error by the reviewer is timeless. Bullseye slow-fire is shot at 50 yards, timed and rapid are shot at 25 yards. This pistol was made and marketed for this kind of competition. Accuracy testing a match pistol at 35 feet is, was, and always will be worthless.
If I wind up buying a 952, I will post meaningful accuracy test results here for all to see. Understood?
 
flyer338 said:
I did not have an opportunity to buy a S&W 952 eight years ago. Nevertheless, the error by the reviewer is timeless. Bullseye slow-fire is shot at 50 yards, timed and rapid are shot at 25 yards. This pistol was made and marketed for this kind of competition. Accuracy testing a match pistol at 35 feet is, was, and always will be worthless.
If I wind up buying a 952, I will post meaningful accuracy test results here for all to see. Understood?
Click to expand...
Wait a minute. You don’t even own one and you’re calling my decade old test worthless lol?

You’ll need a PPC also. In fact, get three of each, so we can get a good sample size in your comparison…


 
Last edited:
Rick H. said:
Don't know how I missed this thread back in the day but I did. There was certainly some interesting information and pictures passed around. Let's say it oozed of bling for gun guys, but if it's one thing I have learned in all my years of shooting it's that it is impossible to determine which is the best or most accurate pistol of all time. The testing of such is always argued including using a Ransom rest or not, type of ammo, what number of shots to fire and at what distance.

With a pistol I like to start any testing at 7 or 10 yards and go out from there. These days due to old age and eyes I only go out to 25 yards. 50 yards isn't in my bag of tricks anymore. I can learn what I need to know at 25 yards or less and I use IDPA targets only now. I no longer waste time and money shooting at traditional bullseye targets. I have yet to see a bad guy with a traditional bullseye target on his torso. All of the pistols spoken of in this thread should do quite well in my testing.

I fluctuate in my likes and dislikes of pistols. I love my Model 52's, but I also love my Sig P-210's and CZ's. I may opt to shoot any of these pistols on any given day and know I would do well with them. I have never owned the fancy S&W 952's or PPC guns spoken of in this thread as I didn't have the money for them when they were available from the factory and I instead concentrated on P-210's and as of late CZ's including a few Shadows and a TSO. I have a new Shadow Target on order and can't wait to get it, but alas, I will have to keep my horses in the barn and control myself. I did have the opportunity to shoot a friends 952 and I didn't do very well with it at the time, but I certainly don't fault the pistol. I always take a grain of salt when shooting an unfamiliar firearm.

I also own several Glocks that are relegated to EDC use for what should be obvious reasons and they shoot well for me too. Simply put I will never own the most accurate pistol of all time because there is no such thing. It's a miss-spoken dream of many people to say they have the most accurate of any firearm. They may think they have the most accurate, but the most accurate firearm is still under construction and in the future. And that's what makes this sport of shooting so much fun.

Rick H.
Click to expand...
Rick, good stuff

I do love the P210. While I own them from three countries, the German models are my favorites.





I’m not a big Wadcutter fan, but I have a couple 52’s that I shoot on occasion.

 
I am not contesting the accuracy of your test results, only the value. No matter how many pistols you have or test, if the test criteria are of no value so are the tests.
Test your guns again at 25 and 50 yards - if you can; if you dare.
Every gun shoots groups that look good at 35’ (12 yards), but what do they do at distances that matter? Match guns are judged at 25 and 50 yards.
 
Last edited:
flyer338 said:
I am not contesting the accuracy of your test results, only the value. No matter how many pistols you have or test, if the test criteria are of no value so are the tests.
Test your guns again at 25 and 50 yards - if you can; if you dare.
Every gun shoots groups that look good at 35’ (12 yards), but what do they do at distances that matter? Match guns are judged at 25 and 50 yards.
Click to expand...
I understand match shooting, but the 952 and PPC were used for a number of things over the years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

sjmjax
Accuracy issues with the 39-2?
2
Replies
22
Views
1K
stansdds
S
Jeep 1
Model 29-2 nickel Unique history
Replies
7
Views
1K
boykinlp
boykinlp
PatriotX
Range Time M52, 952, 686PC Competitor
Replies
5
Views
277
Demetrix3775
D
I
  • Locked
Sold 2-356TSWs 3566 a 3 1/2in. and a 5" barrel new Performance Center price reduced
Replies
2
Views
872
s&wchad
s&wchad
B
New to me 952-1
Replies
8
Views
674
jag22
J

Latest posts

Back
Top