44 Mag shooters. What power scope should I get?

Rule3

Rule3

Member
Silver Supporter
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
22,458
Reaction score
16,107
Location
Florida
I figured this was the best place to post this as more 44 Mag folks here than elsewhere on the forum and I got it so I could shoot heavier loads than out of my 629. So it is related to reloading.;)

I just picked up a Ruger SBH with 7.5" barrel. I want to scope it. I have only tried a scope on a handgun once, a 22 and it was "over scoped" with a 4x power.

I was thinking just a simple fixed 2x ?? I doubt I will be shooting much past 50 yards. I don't want a Red Dot.

What say ye all?:)
 
Register to hide this ad
Heavier loads? WHAT, are you going over to the "Skip Side"?

:D

Never had a hangun scope. I do have a set of safety glasses that have an upper "tri-focal" though. It puts my focus at front sight distances and really helps these older (not as old as yours) eyes focus on that ole front post better! ;)

Dale53 has shot a bunch of handguns with scopes, if he doesn't show up here soon, send him a pm. Great fellow.
 
This one came with rail on it, so it had a scope at some time. I would rather have the stock, standard Ruger rings but the rail gives a bit more adjustment.
 
I've done a bit of shooting with a Nikon Monarch 2x20 EER scope on my 620. BTW, this particular model features 1.75X magnification so it's not a true 2X scope like the newer Nikon Encore.

IMO a 2X scope is a nearly ideal scope for 50 yards if your intent is to achieve Hunting level accuracy. There is ample magnification to shoot groups around 3 inches at that distance and they are relatively compact and light in weight. The only downside is that if you are shooting for pure precision, it's a bit lacking in magnification. An NRA 25 yard slow fire target looks pretty darned small at 50 yards in the reticle and you REALLY have to concentrate on getting the sighting dead perfect.

To sum it up, 2X makes shooting a 3 inch group at 50 yards duck soup if your load and gun are up to it. However, if you want to try for groups of an inch or less you'll probably want a bit more magnification.

PS; I can give a hearty thumbs up for Nikon's handgun scopes, the clarity is nothing short of perfect and mine has held zero perfectly. However, I'll also warn you that you need to snug the mounts down good and tight, on my first outing I shot the rear mount loose after 46 or 47 rounds downrange.
 
It took a while but I found a 1x Tasco world class with a 30mm tube that I mounted on my 29-3 with 10 5/8" barrel. It has a great field of view and is easier to keep moving gamein the cross hairs .
 
For Pete's sake, what you need is a 6-24x50 with a 30 mm tube. After all when you see that trophy buck you want to make sure you can see which tick you're going to aim at don't you?

Seriously, a 2 power should do you well just get the best you can afford. Leupold or Nikon EER would serve you very well.

Pecos
 
If it is merely a hunting weapon I wouldn't exceed 2x, like you are already thinking, for shooting off handed. I've got a 2.5-8x on my 629 which works well for standing as well as on the bench with the magnification turned up.
 
I have found that a 2x is plenty. anymore than that I can see the crosshairs move everytime my heart beats, especially if there is a big buck in the other end of the scope.

vic3620
 
My old Bushnell Phantom was 1.3x, more than enough. 2x is about as high as you can go unless you're unhumanly steady. The real issue is eye relief, and the need for a pistol specific scope. My experience was with an old semi-auto and then with a 617. Its interesting, but without a good rest it sure seems to make your shakes look awful. Consider buying the scope used if you can find it. You've got less invested that way, and there's a very good chance you won't like the end product.
 
Look at the Bushnell Elite 3200 2 - 6x. It maintains a constant eye relief throughout the power range and holds up well. We sell a lot of them at the shop where I work.
 
scooter123 said:
I've done a bit of shooting with a Nikon Monarch 2x20 EER scope on my 620. BTW, this particular model features 1.75X magnification so it's not a true 2X scope like the newer Nikon Encore.

IMO a 2X scope is a nearly ideal scope for 50 yards if your intent is to achieve Hunting level accuracy. There is ample magnification to shoot groups around 3 inches at that distance and they are relatively compact and light in weight. The only downside is that if you are shooting for pure precision, it's a bit lacking in magnification. An NRA 25 yard slow fire target looks pretty darned small at 50 yards in the reticle and you REALLY have to concentrate on getting the sighting dead perfect.

To sum it up, 2X makes shooting a 3 inch group at 50 yards duck soup if your load and gun are up to it. However, if you want to try for groups of an inch or less you'll probably want a bit more magnification.

PS; I can give a hearty thumbs up for Nikon's handgun scopes, the clarity is nothing short of perfect and mine has held zero perfectly. However, I'll also warn you that you need to snug the mounts down good and tight, on my first outing I shot the rear mount loose after 46 or 47 rounds downrange.
Click to expand...

You raise a very important point. I would also like to be able to see groups on targets (the majority of shooting will be at paper) so would a variable be a better choice? I guess I am worried that the higher magnification will be difficult to sight and keep steady. As mentioned, the slightest movement and and the the crosshairs are all over the place.
 
When shooting rifle...........

Rule3 said:
You raise a very important point. I would also like to be able to see groups on targets (the majority of shooting will be at paper) so would a variable be a better choice? I guess I am worried that the higher magnification will be difficult to sight and keep steady. As mentioned, the slightest movement and and the the crosshairs are all over the place.
Click to expand...

The distance is much further but, when shooting rifle there are times when my 3X9 scopes won't let you see the group. Such as when shooting at a black centered target. I suppose you can use shoot and see or a sighting in target, one with mostly white on it, and do better.

Since the wife and I have started to shoot more long guns, we have been using a spotting scope. A cheap one, Barska, was like $60. Clear enough to see anything out to the maximum at our range.

This should be a fun endeavor. Personally, I have started to buy the best optics I can afford at the time. I now have two Leupolds and Nikons. If you are going to keep it, put the best optics on it you can afford.

Just suggestion.
 
If you are shooting supported on the bench with a rest then I don't see why you couldn't have any power you want. I had a 2X on my 6" 629-6 with a Weigand base and standing I could just keep the cross hairs from swimming in front of my eyes. I went to a red dot and found it to be SOOOOOO much easier to focus the dot on the target and squeeze. I know you said you don't want a red dot though. Just offering my experience from having done both.
 
I have a Red Dot on a AR. But to be honest, the dot is to small(cranked all the way up) and I have a bit of Red/Green Color Blindness. In full Sunlight it is hard for me to see. I can get on target but I also want to see what I hit or missed.:o

The problem you had is what I experienced also, but it was a 4x scope so I figured it was the power. I suppose I can get a variable power but will end up spending more than the gun.:rolleyes:
 
With the risk of sounding like I'm pushing a red dot, have you tried a prighter model? Or even a different style like an Aimpoint over an Eotech or a C-More? I gave up the scope since it just didn't work for me and I didn't want to only be able to shoot well from a rest. And the thin black lines in it were just plain hard to see in the bright sun. It was like trying to look down a dark tube with bright sun everywhere else. As an alternative thought, what would you think of trying a fiber optic set of sights? That might be easier for your eyes to see instead of the mild orange front sight insert in the thin white outline of the rear sight blade.
 
Rule3 said:
You raise a very important point. I would also like to be able to see groups on targets (the majority of shooting will be at paper) so would a variable be a better choice? I guess I am worried that the higher magnification will be difficult to sight and keep steady. As mentioned, the slightest movement and and the the crosshairs are all over the place.
Click to expand...

I've found the best way to see the hits on target is to spend a bit of money on the shoot-n-c stickers. Now, 50 yards is a long poke even with a 2X scope and to be honest it's a long poke with even a 10X scope if your shooting a small caliber. I'd suggest you look into a spotting scope and a cheap benchtop tripod for it.

As for shooting for groups, I've been considering the purchase of a Nikon Encore 2.5-8x28 EER. The problem for me is the cost, it's a 310 dollar scope and likely another 60-80 bucks for mounting rings. I can buy a lot of ammo for near 400 bucks. At 2.5X the magnification should be low enough to allow decent stability in the field with some type of improvised support and you can dial it up to 8X when shooting from a proper benchrest. Basically, I'm at the point where I want one but not enough to actually go out and purchase it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
44-40 cast bullets out 44 mag gun
Replies
6
Views
513
venomballistics
venomballistics
mod29
Bullet Sizing, .44 Magnum 29-2
Replies
16
Views
824
M29since14
M
R
Squib load in 44 mag and no explosion
2
Replies
23
Views
2K
David Sinko
D
G
223 wylde brass.
Replies
2
Views
98
AManWearingAHat
AManWearingAHat
S
300 Grain Swift A-Frame & .44 Rem Mag
Replies
5
Views
510
Ivan the Butcher
I

Latest posts

Back
Top