Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Reloading

Reloading All Reloading Topics Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2014, 01:02 PM
SLT223's Avatar
SLT223 SLT223 is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 2,734
Liked 5,060 Times in 1,446 Posts
Default W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load

I've been reloading for a couple months now, and finally learned something first hand about powder burn rate, and accuracy...or so I think. The three loads being compared are low velocity 44 Magnum. Sorry, I don't have a chrono yet so this isn't a very scientific test, but these are all subsonic and fall into the .44 Special range of ballistics.

Gun: S&W M629-4 Mountain Gun

1)
Xtreme 200gr plated RNFP, mic'ed @ .429"
W231 7.0gr
Remington 2 1/2 primer
Range: 10yds
Grouping: desert plate at best

2)
Xtreme 200 gr plated RNFP, mic'ed @ .429"
Titegroup 6.0gr
Remington 2 1/2 primer
Range: 10yds
Grouping: Golf ball

3)
Xtreme 200 gr plated RNFP, mic'ed @ .429"
Clays (NOT Universal Clays) 5.0gr
Remington 2 1/2 primer
Range: 10yds
Grouping: ping pong ball

Load #1 This combination made me think I was having an off day, or my shooting skills were diminishing. After 100 rounds I concluded the resulting pattern could more efficiently be made with any shotgun. Recoil was soft and slow. Unburned powder was present in the bore.

Load #2 First shot hit dead center. Subsequent rounds blew out the center of the target. Zero unburned powder. Recoil was noticeably snappier.

Load #3 Very similar results as Load #2, but even tighter grouping. First shot hit dead center. Subsequent rounds blew out the center of the target. Zero unburned powder present. This load is incredibly clean shooting. The recoil made me think "That's more spank than I'd expect from a bunny fart load".

I think what's happening here is the faster powders (Titegroup and Clays) are causing the bullet to "slug up" in the bore, forcing them to engage the rifling more firmly. I've read that Xtreme plated bullets use soft lead alloy, which I think would make their geometry more susceptible to changing under the force of acceleration. I don't think the W231 was hitting the base of the bullet hard enough to cause this effect. Perhaps with more crimp it would? Maybe the inertia of a 240gr .429" slug would cause more of a "slugging up" effect?

I would like to repeat this experiment with .430 and .431 slugs and see what happens. My guess is that accuracy would even out across the board.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2014, 02:53 PM
Troystat Troystat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 811
Liked 681 Times in 439 Posts
Default

Nicely done test, I am suprised at the difference between the 231 and the other powders as 231 is a pretty fast burning powder as well. Shows that testing really does tell you a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2014, 03:25 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,165
Likes: 3,647
Liked 5,215 Times in 2,176 Posts
Default

If you can find it, Trailboss powder was made for exactly what you are doing. No fuss, no bother.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2014, 03:45 PM
derek45auto's Avatar
derek45auto derek45auto is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 440
Likes: 100
Liked 806 Times in 210 Posts
Default

I've shot some really tight groups with W-231 240grSWC

All the powders you listed should be great for accurate light affordable target loads.

Titegroup burns very hot, will heat up you gun faster, and seems to smoke lead more because of it.
....it's still an excellent target powder
__________________
NRA Life
USPSA/IPSC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2014, 04:42 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

IMO, you'll get better accuracy with plated sized like lead, 0.001" over jacketed. They don't bump up at lower vel. Not a TG fan at all. Clays is ok for light loads. When I was shooting a ton of CAS ammo, I chose Reddot. Fills the bigger cases well, not as spikes as Clays, burns cooler than TG.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO

Last edited by fredj338; 11-09-2014 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2014, 07:55 PM
SLT223's Avatar
SLT223 SLT223 is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 2,734
Liked 5,060 Times in 1,446 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
IMO, you'll get better accuracy with plated sized like lead, 0.001" over jacketed. They don't bump up at lower vel.
The sizing part of your statement I understand. That's why I want try this again with .430/.431 slugs. But if these .429 slugs aren't bumping up in size with faster powder, then why is there such a difference in accuracy between the moderate powder and the fast powders?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:01 PM
fredj338's Avatar
fredj338 fredj338 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kalif. usa
Posts: 6,836
Likes: 2,665
Liked 3,927 Times in 2,366 Posts
Default

Burn rates & bbls, all bbs will react diff to diff loads. A soft to moderate hard lead slug will bump up to seal the bore, I just doubt plated do that unless pushed hard pressure wise.
__________________
NRA Cert. Inst. IDPA CSO
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:23 PM
Fishinfool's Avatar
Fishinfool Fishinfool is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,577
Likes: 8,251
Liked 11,479 Times in 3,035 Posts
Default

You might find if you experiment some with the 231, you will find a charge your gun likes with that powder / bullet combo. I have had good luck with 231 in my .44's using non plated bullets.

Another powder that I really like in the .44 spec. / mag is Red Dot. 6 grains in a spl. case, and 6.5 in a mag case with a 240 grain cast (that fits your throats) gives great consistant accuracy in most of my 44's. About 850 - 900 fps depending on the gun.

Larry
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:29 PM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is online now
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,075
Likes: 41,789
Liked 29,344 Times in 13,867 Posts
Default Plated bullets....

Everybody doesn't have good luck with plated bullets where accuracy is concerned.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:30 PM
venomballistics's Avatar
venomballistics venomballistics is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,983
Likes: 4,808
Liked 7,043 Times in 3,356 Posts
Default

I think its a function of driving the car in the correct gear.
Unburnt powder with 231 is the first clue, Not enough pressure to be efficient or consistent.
Step that one up and it'll do a better job, though it may exceed your intended goal of a cowboy action load.
__________________
it just needs more voltage
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:45 PM
roundgunner's Avatar
roundgunner roundgunner is offline
US Veteran
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
Default

I use 4.5 or 5 TG as my go to 44SPL load with my 3" 629. Easy on the hand and wallet.
__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-09-2014, 10:28 PM
SLT223's Avatar
SLT223 SLT223 is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 2,734
Liked 5,060 Times in 1,446 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roundgunner View Post
I use 4.5 or 5 TG as my go to 44SPL load with my 3" 629. Easy on the hand and wallet.
That's exactly how my 5.0gr load of Clays came to be. I needed a mellow load for my 3" 629-1
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-10-2014, 02:33 AM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 3,765
Liked 7,297 Times in 3,038 Posts
Default

I think your load with 231 is just too light. 231 is a fast powder but
burns much better when pressures are not at the low end of normal.
My Lyman Pistol and Revolver manual lists 9.1 grs as the starting
load with 231 and a 200 gr cast bullet in the 44 magnum case.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-10-2014, 09:16 AM
Forrest r Forrest r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 185
Liked 1,691 Times in 701 Posts
Default clay's rocks

Actually what you've found is that clays is an excellent powder for lite 44mag/plinking/target loads.

6.0g to 6.5g of clays will have more than enough thump for most range play & still give the shooter excellent accuracy.

Awhile back I did a little testing with an old 629 classic that I bought used over a decade ago & have been beating & banging on it ever since. Put a 4x scope on it & sighted it in @ 25yds.

This is the 1st test target I shot, loaded up a bunch of my favorite bullets (keith clone/Mihec 503) with 6.0g of clays and got the scope on paper. From there I walked the shots over sighting the pistol in until the bullets were next to my aiming point (never hit what you're shooting @ when doing test loads). The target on the right was the sighter target that I walked the bullets over to the right, closer to the point of aim/target. The target on the left/bughole was the actual test target shot @ 25yds.



6.5g of clays and a 220g sp/200g hp thompson designed (h&g #142
) swc @25yds.



Another obsolete mold, the lyman 200g sp (429303) & 6.5g of clays @ 25yds.



An old cramer 200g wc cast from a 1950's mold & 6.0g of clays @ 25yds.



Clays isn't the only game in town for lite target loads but when a powder will do 1" groups @ 25yds with 4 out of the 5 bullets being tested. That's extremely impressive!!! After the testing was done I found that after uses 5 different test bullets coupled with 6 differet powders produced 15 targets with 1" or less groups @ 25yds and clays did 4 of those 15 targets.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 11-10-2014, 10:25 AM
dla dla is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 326
Liked 469 Times in 278 Posts
Default

One good reason to use Clays instead of Titegroup - you can see Clays in a once-fired case.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-10-2014, 11:14 AM
SLT223's Avatar
SLT223 SLT223 is offline
Member
W231 vs Titegroup vs Clays in subsonic 44 Mag "cowboy" load  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 2,734
Liked 5,060 Times in 1,446 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alwslate View Post
I think your load with 231 is just too light. 231 is a fast powder but
burns much better when pressures are not at the low end of normal.
My Lyman Pistol and Revolver manual lists 9.1 grs as the starting
load with 231 and a 200 gr cast bullet in the 44 magnum case.
I completely agree with you. That was my first round with 231, and the Hodgdon site actually has 7.4grs as max for 200 cast RN, which is why I started @ 6.0gr.

Last edited by SLT223; 11-10-2014 at 11:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titegroup .223 load... Maximumbob54 Reloading 5 08-29-2013 11:29 AM
need good intro to "Universal Clays" m657 Reloading 19 05-27-2013 11:15 PM
W231 for .38 spl. "FBI" load? PeterCartwright Reloading 19 04-06-2012 11:15 PM
Bulk "subsonic" ammo thats "reliable in the 15-22 ??? nathantc Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 15 03-19-2012 02:00 AM
S&W Model 52 (W231) Load? Glenn Bruce Reloading 7 12-13-2010 07:40 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)